Beneficio emodinamico della stimolazione sequenziale atrio-ventricolare.

Translated title of the contribution: Hemodynamic benefits of sequential atrioventricular pacing

S. Ghio, G. Marinoni, P. Broglia, E. Eleuteri, F. Barba, G. Bargiggia, C. Bosatra, V. Pantusa, R. Perotti, C. Montemartini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic benefits of atrioventricular (A-V) sequential pacing. 30 pts implanted with DDD pacemakers underwent M-mode, B-mode and Doppler echocardiography. In each patient, left ventricular (LV) stroke volume was assessed by measuring the time-velocity integral of mitral inflow in the following modes and rates: VOO at 70 ppm or at the minimum stimulation rate and at 120 ppm; DOO at the same rates with different A-V delay (100, 150, 200, 250 and, whenever possible, 300 msec). The increase in stroke volume obtained with dual chamber pacing at the optimal A-V delay was 45 +/- 25% at 75 ppm and 29 +/- 14% at 120 ppm (p less than 0.05 75 vs 120 ppm). This increase was significantly higher in pts with than in pts without LV hypertrophy (respectively: 51.9 +/- 20.4 vs 36.9 +/- 20.8% at 75 ppm, p less than 0.05 and 33 +/- 13.4 vs 25.4 +/- 14.5% at 120 ppm, p = 0.08). Concerning the A-V delay, we noted that at 75 ppm stroke volume was significantly higher in DOO than in VOO with any A-V delay ranging +/- 100 msec from the optimal one; at 120 ppm the hemodynamic benefit of DOO pacing was observed only when the programmed A-V delay was the optimal one or very near to it. In conclusion, atrio-ventricular sequential pacing allows a significant increase in LV stroke volume over single chamber ventricular pacing both at 75 and 120 ppm. Programming the optimal A-V delay is absolutely necessary to obtain this hemodynamic benefit at the higher stimulation rate.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)957-964
Number of pages8
JournalGiornale Italiano di Cardiologia
Volume21
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1991

Fingerprint

Stroke Volume
Hemodynamics
Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane
Doppler Echocardiography
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Ghio, S., Marinoni, G., Broglia, P., Eleuteri, E., Barba, F., Bargiggia, G., ... Montemartini, C. (1991). Beneficio emodinamico della stimolazione sequenziale atrio-ventricolare. Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia, 21(9), 957-964.

Beneficio emodinamico della stimolazione sequenziale atrio-ventricolare. / Ghio, S.; Marinoni, G.; Broglia, P.; Eleuteri, E.; Barba, F.; Bargiggia, G.; Bosatra, C.; Pantusa, V.; Perotti, R.; Montemartini, C.

In: Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia, Vol. 21, No. 9, 09.1991, p. 957-964.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ghio, S, Marinoni, G, Broglia, P, Eleuteri, E, Barba, F, Bargiggia, G, Bosatra, C, Pantusa, V, Perotti, R & Montemartini, C 1991, 'Beneficio emodinamico della stimolazione sequenziale atrio-ventricolare.', Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 957-964.
Ghio, S. ; Marinoni, G. ; Broglia, P. ; Eleuteri, E. ; Barba, F. ; Bargiggia, G. ; Bosatra, C. ; Pantusa, V. ; Perotti, R. ; Montemartini, C. / Beneficio emodinamico della stimolazione sequenziale atrio-ventricolare. In: Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia. 1991 ; Vol. 21, No. 9. pp. 957-964.
@article{54e336dd551e46beb2c6c6d920212b67,
title = "Beneficio emodinamico della stimolazione sequenziale atrio-ventricolare.",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic benefits of atrioventricular (A-V) sequential pacing. 30 pts implanted with DDD pacemakers underwent M-mode, B-mode and Doppler echocardiography. In each patient, left ventricular (LV) stroke volume was assessed by measuring the time-velocity integral of mitral inflow in the following modes and rates: VOO at 70 ppm or at the minimum stimulation rate and at 120 ppm; DOO at the same rates with different A-V delay (100, 150, 200, 250 and, whenever possible, 300 msec). The increase in stroke volume obtained with dual chamber pacing at the optimal A-V delay was 45 +/- 25{\%} at 75 ppm and 29 +/- 14{\%} at 120 ppm (p less than 0.05 75 vs 120 ppm). This increase was significantly higher in pts with than in pts without LV hypertrophy (respectively: 51.9 +/- 20.4 vs 36.9 +/- 20.8{\%} at 75 ppm, p less than 0.05 and 33 +/- 13.4 vs 25.4 +/- 14.5{\%} at 120 ppm, p = 0.08). Concerning the A-V delay, we noted that at 75 ppm stroke volume was significantly higher in DOO than in VOO with any A-V delay ranging +/- 100 msec from the optimal one; at 120 ppm the hemodynamic benefit of DOO pacing was observed only when the programmed A-V delay was the optimal one or very near to it. In conclusion, atrio-ventricular sequential pacing allows a significant increase in LV stroke volume over single chamber ventricular pacing both at 75 and 120 ppm. Programming the optimal A-V delay is absolutely necessary to obtain this hemodynamic benefit at the higher stimulation rate.",
author = "S. Ghio and G. Marinoni and P. Broglia and E. Eleuteri and F. Barba and G. Bargiggia and C. Bosatra and V. Pantusa and R. Perotti and C. Montemartini",
year = "1991",
month = "9",
language = "Italian",
volume = "21",
pages = "957--964",
journal = "Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia",
issn = "0046-5968",
publisher = "Societa Italiana di Cardiologia",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beneficio emodinamico della stimolazione sequenziale atrio-ventricolare.

AU - Ghio, S.

AU - Marinoni, G.

AU - Broglia, P.

AU - Eleuteri, E.

AU - Barba, F.

AU - Bargiggia, G.

AU - Bosatra, C.

AU - Pantusa, V.

AU - Perotti, R.

AU - Montemartini, C.

PY - 1991/9

Y1 - 1991/9

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic benefits of atrioventricular (A-V) sequential pacing. 30 pts implanted with DDD pacemakers underwent M-mode, B-mode and Doppler echocardiography. In each patient, left ventricular (LV) stroke volume was assessed by measuring the time-velocity integral of mitral inflow in the following modes and rates: VOO at 70 ppm or at the minimum stimulation rate and at 120 ppm; DOO at the same rates with different A-V delay (100, 150, 200, 250 and, whenever possible, 300 msec). The increase in stroke volume obtained with dual chamber pacing at the optimal A-V delay was 45 +/- 25% at 75 ppm and 29 +/- 14% at 120 ppm (p less than 0.05 75 vs 120 ppm). This increase was significantly higher in pts with than in pts without LV hypertrophy (respectively: 51.9 +/- 20.4 vs 36.9 +/- 20.8% at 75 ppm, p less than 0.05 and 33 +/- 13.4 vs 25.4 +/- 14.5% at 120 ppm, p = 0.08). Concerning the A-V delay, we noted that at 75 ppm stroke volume was significantly higher in DOO than in VOO with any A-V delay ranging +/- 100 msec from the optimal one; at 120 ppm the hemodynamic benefit of DOO pacing was observed only when the programmed A-V delay was the optimal one or very near to it. In conclusion, atrio-ventricular sequential pacing allows a significant increase in LV stroke volume over single chamber ventricular pacing both at 75 and 120 ppm. Programming the optimal A-V delay is absolutely necessary to obtain this hemodynamic benefit at the higher stimulation rate.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic benefits of atrioventricular (A-V) sequential pacing. 30 pts implanted with DDD pacemakers underwent M-mode, B-mode and Doppler echocardiography. In each patient, left ventricular (LV) stroke volume was assessed by measuring the time-velocity integral of mitral inflow in the following modes and rates: VOO at 70 ppm or at the minimum stimulation rate and at 120 ppm; DOO at the same rates with different A-V delay (100, 150, 200, 250 and, whenever possible, 300 msec). The increase in stroke volume obtained with dual chamber pacing at the optimal A-V delay was 45 +/- 25% at 75 ppm and 29 +/- 14% at 120 ppm (p less than 0.05 75 vs 120 ppm). This increase was significantly higher in pts with than in pts without LV hypertrophy (respectively: 51.9 +/- 20.4 vs 36.9 +/- 20.8% at 75 ppm, p less than 0.05 and 33 +/- 13.4 vs 25.4 +/- 14.5% at 120 ppm, p = 0.08). Concerning the A-V delay, we noted that at 75 ppm stroke volume was significantly higher in DOO than in VOO with any A-V delay ranging +/- 100 msec from the optimal one; at 120 ppm the hemodynamic benefit of DOO pacing was observed only when the programmed A-V delay was the optimal one or very near to it. In conclusion, atrio-ventricular sequential pacing allows a significant increase in LV stroke volume over single chamber ventricular pacing both at 75 and 120 ppm. Programming the optimal A-V delay is absolutely necessary to obtain this hemodynamic benefit at the higher stimulation rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026218440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026218440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

C2 - 1790833

AN - SCOPUS:0026218440

VL - 21

SP - 957

EP - 964

JO - Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia

JF - Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia

SN - 0046-5968

IS - 9

ER -