Hemodynamic effects of exercise training in heart failure

Gaia Cattadori, Jean Paul Schmid, Nicolas Brugger, Erica Gondoni, Pietro Palermo, Piergiuseppe Agostoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Background: Exercise performance improvement after training in heart failure (HF) can be due to central or peripheral changes. Methods and Results: In 70 HF stable patients we measured peak VO 2 and cardiac output (CO, inert gas rebreathing technique) and calculated arteriovenous O 2 differences (a-v O 2diff) before and after an 8-week training program. Peak VO 2 changed from 1111 ± 403 mL/minute to 1191 ± 441 (P 2diff from 17.5 ± 5.1 mL/100 mL to 16.6 ± 4.1 (P =.081). Changes in peak CO and a-v O 2diff allowed to identify 4 behaviors: group 1: (n = 15) reduction in peak CO and increase in a-v O 2diff (peak VO 2 unchanged, peak workload +9.5%); group 2: (n = 16) both peak CO and a-v O 2diff increased as well as peak VO 2 (23%) and workload (18%); group 3: (n = 4) peak CO and a-v O 2diff reduced as well as peak VO 2 (-18%) and workload (-5%); group 4: (n = 35) peak CO increased with a-v O 2diff reduced (increase in peak VO 2 by 5.5 and workload by 8.4%). Conclusions: Exercise training improves peakVO 2 by increasing CO with unchanged a-v O 2diff. A reduction after training of a-v O 2diff with an increase in CO is frequent (50% of cases), is suggestive of blood flow redistribution and, per se, not a sign of reduced muscle performance been associated with improved exercise capacity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)916-922
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cardiac Failure
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011


  • cardiac output
  • heart failure
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Hemodynamic effects of exercise training in heart failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this