Heterogeneity and symptom structure of schizophrenia

Angelo Picardi, Cinzia Viroli, Lorenzo Tarsitani, Rossella Miglio, Giovanni de Girolamo, Giuseppe Dell'Acqua, Massimo Biondi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies failed to identify a consistent factor structure of the BPRS-24 in schizophrenia. Our aims were to examine the fit of all previously published factor models and then to explore unobserved population heterogeneity and identify salient latent classes. Two hundred thirty-nine patients with ICD-10 schizophrenia admitted to a random sample of all Italian public and private acute inpatient units during an index period were administered the BPRS-24. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test all factor models derived in previous studies. Then, factor mixture analysis (FMA) with heteroscedastic components was carried out to explore unobserved population heterogeneity. No previously reported factor solution showed adequate fit in CFA. FMA indicated the presence of three heterogeneous groups and yielded a 5-factor solution (Depression, Positive Symptoms, Disorganization, Negative Symptoms, Activation). Group 1 was characterized by higher Disorganization, lower Activation, lower psychosocial functioning, greater lifetime number of admissions, more frequent history of compulsory admission. Group 2 displayed lower Disorganization. Group 3 showed higher Activation and more frequent history of recent self-harming behavior. Our finding that a reliable factor structure for the BPRS-24 could be obtained only after assuming population heterogeneity suggests that the difficulty in identifying a consistent factor structure may be ascribed to the clinical heterogeneity of schizophrenia. As compared with clinical subtypes, the psychopathological dimensions displayed much greater discriminatory power between groups identified by FMA. Though preliminary, our findings corroborate that a dimensional approach to psychopathology can facilitate the assessment of the clinical heterogeneity of schizophrenia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)386-394
Number of pages9
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume198
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 15 2012

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Schizophrenia
Population Characteristics
International Classification of Diseases
Psychopathology
Inpatients
Depression

Keywords

  • Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
  • Confirmatory factor analysis
  • Factor mixture analysis
  • Psychosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Picardi, A., Viroli, C., Tarsitani, L., Miglio, R., de Girolamo, G., Dell'Acqua, G., & Biondi, M. (2012). Heterogeneity and symptom structure of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 198(3), 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.051

Heterogeneity and symptom structure of schizophrenia. / Picardi, Angelo; Viroli, Cinzia; Tarsitani, Lorenzo; Miglio, Rossella; de Girolamo, Giovanni; Dell'Acqua, Giuseppe; Biondi, Massimo.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 198, No. 3, 15.08.2012, p. 386-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Picardi, A, Viroli, C, Tarsitani, L, Miglio, R, de Girolamo, G, Dell'Acqua, G & Biondi, M 2012, 'Heterogeneity and symptom structure of schizophrenia', Psychiatry Research, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.051
Picardi A, Viroli C, Tarsitani L, Miglio R, de Girolamo G, Dell'Acqua G et al. Heterogeneity and symptom structure of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research. 2012 Aug 15;198(3):386-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.051
Picardi, Angelo ; Viroli, Cinzia ; Tarsitani, Lorenzo ; Miglio, Rossella ; de Girolamo, Giovanni ; Dell'Acqua, Giuseppe ; Biondi, Massimo. / Heterogeneity and symptom structure of schizophrenia. In: Psychiatry Research. 2012 ; Vol. 198, No. 3. pp. 386-394.
@article{829e28c04c84490ba4ab5fbc9f5938e5,
title = "Heterogeneity and symptom structure of schizophrenia",
abstract = "Previous studies failed to identify a consistent factor structure of the BPRS-24 in schizophrenia. Our aims were to examine the fit of all previously published factor models and then to explore unobserved population heterogeneity and identify salient latent classes. Two hundred thirty-nine patients with ICD-10 schizophrenia admitted to a random sample of all Italian public and private acute inpatient units during an index period were administered the BPRS-24. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test all factor models derived in previous studies. Then, factor mixture analysis (FMA) with heteroscedastic components was carried out to explore unobserved population heterogeneity. No previously reported factor solution showed adequate fit in CFA. FMA indicated the presence of three heterogeneous groups and yielded a 5-factor solution (Depression, Positive Symptoms, Disorganization, Negative Symptoms, Activation). Group 1 was characterized by higher Disorganization, lower Activation, lower psychosocial functioning, greater lifetime number of admissions, more frequent history of compulsory admission. Group 2 displayed lower Disorganization. Group 3 showed higher Activation and more frequent history of recent self-harming behavior. Our finding that a reliable factor structure for the BPRS-24 could be obtained only after assuming population heterogeneity suggests that the difficulty in identifying a consistent factor structure may be ascribed to the clinical heterogeneity of schizophrenia. As compared with clinical subtypes, the psychopathological dimensions displayed much greater discriminatory power between groups identified by FMA. Though preliminary, our findings corroborate that a dimensional approach to psychopathology can facilitate the assessment of the clinical heterogeneity of schizophrenia.",
keywords = "Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Confirmatory factor analysis, Factor mixture analysis, Psychosis",
author = "Angelo Picardi and Cinzia Viroli and Lorenzo Tarsitani and Rossella Miglio and {de Girolamo}, Giovanni and Giuseppe Dell'Acqua and Massimo Biondi",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.051",
language = "English",
volume = "198",
pages = "386--394",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heterogeneity and symptom structure of schizophrenia

AU - Picardi, Angelo

AU - Viroli, Cinzia

AU - Tarsitani, Lorenzo

AU - Miglio, Rossella

AU - de Girolamo, Giovanni

AU - Dell'Acqua, Giuseppe

AU - Biondi, Massimo

PY - 2012/8/15

Y1 - 2012/8/15

N2 - Previous studies failed to identify a consistent factor structure of the BPRS-24 in schizophrenia. Our aims were to examine the fit of all previously published factor models and then to explore unobserved population heterogeneity and identify salient latent classes. Two hundred thirty-nine patients with ICD-10 schizophrenia admitted to a random sample of all Italian public and private acute inpatient units during an index period were administered the BPRS-24. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test all factor models derived in previous studies. Then, factor mixture analysis (FMA) with heteroscedastic components was carried out to explore unobserved population heterogeneity. No previously reported factor solution showed adequate fit in CFA. FMA indicated the presence of three heterogeneous groups and yielded a 5-factor solution (Depression, Positive Symptoms, Disorganization, Negative Symptoms, Activation). Group 1 was characterized by higher Disorganization, lower Activation, lower psychosocial functioning, greater lifetime number of admissions, more frequent history of compulsory admission. Group 2 displayed lower Disorganization. Group 3 showed higher Activation and more frequent history of recent self-harming behavior. Our finding that a reliable factor structure for the BPRS-24 could be obtained only after assuming population heterogeneity suggests that the difficulty in identifying a consistent factor structure may be ascribed to the clinical heterogeneity of schizophrenia. As compared with clinical subtypes, the psychopathological dimensions displayed much greater discriminatory power between groups identified by FMA. Though preliminary, our findings corroborate that a dimensional approach to psychopathology can facilitate the assessment of the clinical heterogeneity of schizophrenia.

AB - Previous studies failed to identify a consistent factor structure of the BPRS-24 in schizophrenia. Our aims were to examine the fit of all previously published factor models and then to explore unobserved population heterogeneity and identify salient latent classes. Two hundred thirty-nine patients with ICD-10 schizophrenia admitted to a random sample of all Italian public and private acute inpatient units during an index period were administered the BPRS-24. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test all factor models derived in previous studies. Then, factor mixture analysis (FMA) with heteroscedastic components was carried out to explore unobserved population heterogeneity. No previously reported factor solution showed adequate fit in CFA. FMA indicated the presence of three heterogeneous groups and yielded a 5-factor solution (Depression, Positive Symptoms, Disorganization, Negative Symptoms, Activation). Group 1 was characterized by higher Disorganization, lower Activation, lower psychosocial functioning, greater lifetime number of admissions, more frequent history of compulsory admission. Group 2 displayed lower Disorganization. Group 3 showed higher Activation and more frequent history of recent self-harming behavior. Our finding that a reliable factor structure for the BPRS-24 could be obtained only after assuming population heterogeneity suggests that the difficulty in identifying a consistent factor structure may be ascribed to the clinical heterogeneity of schizophrenia. As compared with clinical subtypes, the psychopathological dimensions displayed much greater discriminatory power between groups identified by FMA. Though preliminary, our findings corroborate that a dimensional approach to psychopathology can facilitate the assessment of the clinical heterogeneity of schizophrenia.

KW - Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale

KW - Confirmatory factor analysis

KW - Factor mixture analysis

KW - Psychosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868660468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868660468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.051

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.051

M3 - Article

C2 - 22424892

AN - SCOPUS:84868660468

VL - 198

SP - 386

EP - 394

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

IS - 3

ER -