Higher frequency of early local side effects with aqueous versus depot immunotherapy for Hymenoptera venom allergy

G. Cadario, F. Marengo, E. Ranghino, R. Rossi, B. Gatti, R. Cantone, F. Bona, R. Pellegrino, G. Feyles, P. Puccinelli, Samuele E. Burastero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Venom immunotherapy has proven a very effective method for the treatment of allergy to Hymenoptera venom. Aqueous instead of depot extracts are prevalently used for this immunotherapy. The advantage of using aqueous extracts has not been fully investigated. We made an open, non-controlled study on 45 subjects sensitized to either Apis mellifera or Vespula spp. Patients were assigned to either a depot (N=27) or an aqueous (N=18) immunotherapy regimen, and side effects were monitored during the induction and the 3-year maintenance phase. The effect of naturally occurring stings during the treatment and after its interruption was recorded as well. Side effects were less frequent with the depot extract both on a "per patient" (22.2% versus 50.0%) and on a "per dose" (2.9% versus 10,2%) basis (p=0.026 and p

Fingerprint

Hymenoptera
Venoms
Immunotherapy
Hypersensitivity
Bees
Bites and Stings
Maintenance
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Aqueous extract
  • Depot extracts
  • Hymenoptera venom allergy
  • Immunotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy

Cite this

Higher frequency of early local side effects with aqueous versus depot immunotherapy for Hymenoptera venom allergy. / Cadario, G.; Marengo, F.; Ranghino, E.; Rossi, R.; Gatti, B.; Cantone, R.; Bona, F.; Pellegrino, R.; Feyles, G.; Puccinelli, P.; Burastero, Samuele E.

In: Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology : official organ of the International Association of Asthmology (INTERASMA) and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Alergia e Inmunología, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2004, p. 127-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fd140df279aa48e3bbd2fd9e665d75b7,
title = "Higher frequency of early local side effects with aqueous versus depot immunotherapy for Hymenoptera venom allergy",
abstract = "Venom immunotherapy has proven a very effective method for the treatment of allergy to Hymenoptera venom. Aqueous instead of depot extracts are prevalently used for this immunotherapy. The advantage of using aqueous extracts has not been fully investigated. We made an open, non-controlled study on 45 subjects sensitized to either Apis mellifera or Vespula spp. Patients were assigned to either a depot (N=27) or an aqueous (N=18) immunotherapy regimen, and side effects were monitored during the induction and the 3-year maintenance phase. The effect of naturally occurring stings during the treatment and after its interruption was recorded as well. Side effects were less frequent with the depot extract both on a {"}per patient{"} (22.2{\%} versus 50.0{\%}) and on a {"}per dose{"} (2.9{\%} versus 10,2{\%}) basis (p=0.026 and p",
keywords = "Aqueous extract, Depot extracts, Hymenoptera venom allergy, Immunotherapy",
author = "G. Cadario and F. Marengo and E. Ranghino and R. Rossi and B. Gatti and R. Cantone and F. Bona and R. Pellegrino and G. Feyles and P. Puccinelli and Burastero, {Samuele E.}",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "127--133",
journal = "Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology",
issn = "1018-9068",
publisher = "Esmon",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Higher frequency of early local side effects with aqueous versus depot immunotherapy for Hymenoptera venom allergy

AU - Cadario, G.

AU - Marengo, F.

AU - Ranghino, E.

AU - Rossi, R.

AU - Gatti, B.

AU - Cantone, R.

AU - Bona, F.

AU - Pellegrino, R.

AU - Feyles, G.

AU - Puccinelli, P.

AU - Burastero, Samuele E.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Venom immunotherapy has proven a very effective method for the treatment of allergy to Hymenoptera venom. Aqueous instead of depot extracts are prevalently used for this immunotherapy. The advantage of using aqueous extracts has not been fully investigated. We made an open, non-controlled study on 45 subjects sensitized to either Apis mellifera or Vespula spp. Patients were assigned to either a depot (N=27) or an aqueous (N=18) immunotherapy regimen, and side effects were monitored during the induction and the 3-year maintenance phase. The effect of naturally occurring stings during the treatment and after its interruption was recorded as well. Side effects were less frequent with the depot extract both on a "per patient" (22.2% versus 50.0%) and on a "per dose" (2.9% versus 10,2%) basis (p=0.026 and p

AB - Venom immunotherapy has proven a very effective method for the treatment of allergy to Hymenoptera venom. Aqueous instead of depot extracts are prevalently used for this immunotherapy. The advantage of using aqueous extracts has not been fully investigated. We made an open, non-controlled study on 45 subjects sensitized to either Apis mellifera or Vespula spp. Patients were assigned to either a depot (N=27) or an aqueous (N=18) immunotherapy regimen, and side effects were monitored during the induction and the 3-year maintenance phase. The effect of naturally occurring stings during the treatment and after its interruption was recorded as well. Side effects were less frequent with the depot extract both on a "per patient" (22.2% versus 50.0%) and on a "per dose" (2.9% versus 10,2%) basis (p=0.026 and p

KW - Aqueous extract

KW - Depot extracts

KW - Hymenoptera venom allergy

KW - Immunotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3343015938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3343015938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15301302

AN - SCOPUS:3343015938

VL - 14

SP - 127

EP - 133

JO - Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology

JF - Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology

SN - 1018-9068

IS - 2

ER -