Histopathologic interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions with equivocal dermoscopic features: A pilot study

G. Ferrara, G. Argenziano, H. P. Soyer, P. D'Argenio, P. Carli, L. Cerroni, S. Chimenti, V. De Giorgi, M. Delfino, G. De Rosa, L. El Shabrawi-Caelen, A. Ferrari, D. Massi, G. Mazzocchetti, K. Peris, D. Piccolo, M. Santucci, M. Scalvenzi, S. Staibano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims and background: Dermoscopy (dermatoscopy, skin surface microscopy, epiluminescence microscopy) has been increasingly employed in recent years for the preoperative detection of cutaneous melanoma, and dermatoscopic features of pigmented skin lesions have been previously defined using histopathology (HP) as the "key to the code". The aim of the present study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement on the HP diagnosis in a series of epiluminescence microscopy equivocal melanocytic skin lesions. Study design: Ten melanocytic skin lesions were selected on the basis of diagnostic disagreement of at least 2 out of 9 epiluminescence microscopy observers. The histologic specimens from the 10 lesions were examined by 9 HP observers. The agreement of the HP diagnoses was calculated by means of Fleiss' k statistics. Results: The overall HP agreement was less than excellent (k= 0.5). When considering the prevailing epiluminescence microscopic and HP diagnoses, 2 cases were shown to be epiluminescence microscopy false-negative melanomas. Virtually no agreement was found among epiluminescence microscopy observers in 4 cases (40%) or among HP observers in 3 cases (30%). However, only one pigmented skin lesion remained unclassifiable on epiluminescence microscopy as well as HP. Conclusions: When at least 2 epiluminescence microscopy experts disagree in the evaluation of a given melanocytic skin lesion, even HP consultations may give equivocal results. The need to establish more reliable epiluminescence microscopic and HP criteria by performing an improved and meticulous clinicopathologic correlation, e.g. by using telecommunication via Internet, is emphasized.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-449
Number of pages5
JournalTumori
Volume86
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Dermoscopy
Skin
Melanoma
Telecommunications
Internet
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • Epiluminescence microscopy
  • Histopathology
  • Interobserver agreement
  • Melanoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Ferrara, G., Argenziano, G., Soyer, H. P., D'Argenio, P., Carli, P., Cerroni, L., ... Staibano, S. (2000). Histopathologic interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions with equivocal dermoscopic features: A pilot study. Tumori, 86(6), 445-449.

Histopathologic interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions with equivocal dermoscopic features : A pilot study. / Ferrara, G.; Argenziano, G.; Soyer, H. P.; D'Argenio, P.; Carli, P.; Cerroni, L.; Chimenti, S.; De Giorgi, V.; Delfino, M.; De Rosa, G.; El Shabrawi-Caelen, L.; Ferrari, A.; Massi, D.; Mazzocchetti, G.; Peris, K.; Piccolo, D.; Santucci, M.; Scalvenzi, M.; Staibano, S.

In: Tumori, Vol. 86, No. 6, 2000, p. 445-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferrara, G, Argenziano, G, Soyer, HP, D'Argenio, P, Carli, P, Cerroni, L, Chimenti, S, De Giorgi, V, Delfino, M, De Rosa, G, El Shabrawi-Caelen, L, Ferrari, A, Massi, D, Mazzocchetti, G, Peris, K, Piccolo, D, Santucci, M, Scalvenzi, M & Staibano, S 2000, 'Histopathologic interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions with equivocal dermoscopic features: A pilot study', Tumori, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 445-449.
Ferrara G, Argenziano G, Soyer HP, D'Argenio P, Carli P, Cerroni L et al. Histopathologic interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions with equivocal dermoscopic features: A pilot study. Tumori. 2000;86(6):445-449.
Ferrara, G. ; Argenziano, G. ; Soyer, H. P. ; D'Argenio, P. ; Carli, P. ; Cerroni, L. ; Chimenti, S. ; De Giorgi, V. ; Delfino, M. ; De Rosa, G. ; El Shabrawi-Caelen, L. ; Ferrari, A. ; Massi, D. ; Mazzocchetti, G. ; Peris, K. ; Piccolo, D. ; Santucci, M. ; Scalvenzi, M. ; Staibano, S. / Histopathologic interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions with equivocal dermoscopic features : A pilot study. In: Tumori. 2000 ; Vol. 86, No. 6. pp. 445-449.
@article{b5455a61c4e344b495391207d503a554,
title = "Histopathologic interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions with equivocal dermoscopic features: A pilot study",
abstract = "Aims and background: Dermoscopy (dermatoscopy, skin surface microscopy, epiluminescence microscopy) has been increasingly employed in recent years for the preoperative detection of cutaneous melanoma, and dermatoscopic features of pigmented skin lesions have been previously defined using histopathology (HP) as the {"}key to the code{"}. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement on the HP diagnosis in a series of epiluminescence microscopy equivocal melanocytic skin lesions. Study design: Ten melanocytic skin lesions were selected on the basis of diagnostic disagreement of at least 2 out of 9 epiluminescence microscopy observers. The histologic specimens from the 10 lesions were examined by 9 HP observers. The agreement of the HP diagnoses was calculated by means of Fleiss' k statistics. Results: The overall HP agreement was less than excellent (k= 0.5). When considering the prevailing epiluminescence microscopic and HP diagnoses, 2 cases were shown to be epiluminescence microscopy false-negative melanomas. Virtually no agreement was found among epiluminescence microscopy observers in 4 cases (40{\%}) or among HP observers in 3 cases (30{\%}). However, only one pigmented skin lesion remained unclassifiable on epiluminescence microscopy as well as HP. Conclusions: When at least 2 epiluminescence microscopy experts disagree in the evaluation of a given melanocytic skin lesion, even HP consultations may give equivocal results. The need to establish more reliable epiluminescence microscopic and HP criteria by performing an improved and meticulous clinicopathologic correlation, e.g. by using telecommunication via Internet, is emphasized.",
keywords = "Epiluminescence microscopy, Histopathology, Interobserver agreement, Melanoma",
author = "G. Ferrara and G. Argenziano and Soyer, {H. P.} and P. D'Argenio and P. Carli and L. Cerroni and S. Chimenti and {De Giorgi}, V. and M. Delfino and {De Rosa}, G. and {El Shabrawi-Caelen}, L. and A. Ferrari and D. Massi and G. Mazzocchetti and K. Peris and D. Piccolo and M. Santucci and M. Scalvenzi and S. Staibano",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "445--449",
journal = "Tumori",
issn = "0300-8916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histopathologic interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions with equivocal dermoscopic features

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Ferrara, G.

AU - Argenziano, G.

AU - Soyer, H. P.

AU - D'Argenio, P.

AU - Carli, P.

AU - Cerroni, L.

AU - Chimenti, S.

AU - De Giorgi, V.

AU - Delfino, M.

AU - De Rosa, G.

AU - El Shabrawi-Caelen, L.

AU - Ferrari, A.

AU - Massi, D.

AU - Mazzocchetti, G.

AU - Peris, K.

AU - Piccolo, D.

AU - Santucci, M.

AU - Scalvenzi, M.

AU - Staibano, S.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Aims and background: Dermoscopy (dermatoscopy, skin surface microscopy, epiluminescence microscopy) has been increasingly employed in recent years for the preoperative detection of cutaneous melanoma, and dermatoscopic features of pigmented skin lesions have been previously defined using histopathology (HP) as the "key to the code". The aim of the present study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement on the HP diagnosis in a series of epiluminescence microscopy equivocal melanocytic skin lesions. Study design: Ten melanocytic skin lesions were selected on the basis of diagnostic disagreement of at least 2 out of 9 epiluminescence microscopy observers. The histologic specimens from the 10 lesions were examined by 9 HP observers. The agreement of the HP diagnoses was calculated by means of Fleiss' k statistics. Results: The overall HP agreement was less than excellent (k= 0.5). When considering the prevailing epiluminescence microscopic and HP diagnoses, 2 cases were shown to be epiluminescence microscopy false-negative melanomas. Virtually no agreement was found among epiluminescence microscopy observers in 4 cases (40%) or among HP observers in 3 cases (30%). However, only one pigmented skin lesion remained unclassifiable on epiluminescence microscopy as well as HP. Conclusions: When at least 2 epiluminescence microscopy experts disagree in the evaluation of a given melanocytic skin lesion, even HP consultations may give equivocal results. The need to establish more reliable epiluminescence microscopic and HP criteria by performing an improved and meticulous clinicopathologic correlation, e.g. by using telecommunication via Internet, is emphasized.

AB - Aims and background: Dermoscopy (dermatoscopy, skin surface microscopy, epiluminescence microscopy) has been increasingly employed in recent years for the preoperative detection of cutaneous melanoma, and dermatoscopic features of pigmented skin lesions have been previously defined using histopathology (HP) as the "key to the code". The aim of the present study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement on the HP diagnosis in a series of epiluminescence microscopy equivocal melanocytic skin lesions. Study design: Ten melanocytic skin lesions were selected on the basis of diagnostic disagreement of at least 2 out of 9 epiluminescence microscopy observers. The histologic specimens from the 10 lesions were examined by 9 HP observers. The agreement of the HP diagnoses was calculated by means of Fleiss' k statistics. Results: The overall HP agreement was less than excellent (k= 0.5). When considering the prevailing epiluminescence microscopic and HP diagnoses, 2 cases were shown to be epiluminescence microscopy false-negative melanomas. Virtually no agreement was found among epiluminescence microscopy observers in 4 cases (40%) or among HP observers in 3 cases (30%). However, only one pigmented skin lesion remained unclassifiable on epiluminescence microscopy as well as HP. Conclusions: When at least 2 epiluminescence microscopy experts disagree in the evaluation of a given melanocytic skin lesion, even HP consultations may give equivocal results. The need to establish more reliable epiluminescence microscopic and HP criteria by performing an improved and meticulous clinicopathologic correlation, e.g. by using telecommunication via Internet, is emphasized.

KW - Epiluminescence microscopy

KW - Histopathology

KW - Interobserver agreement

KW - Melanoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034491945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034491945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11218183

AN - SCOPUS:0034491945

VL - 86

SP - 445

EP - 449

JO - Tumori

JF - Tumori

SN - 0300-8916

IS - 6

ER -