Hope in severe disease: a review of the literature on the construct and the tools for assessing hope in the psycho-oncologic setting

Claudia Piccinelli, Carlo A lfredo Clerici, Laura Veneroni, Andrea Ferrari, Tullio Proserpio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Research on the topic of hope began a long time ago but, more recently, interest in this construct has focused mainly on the development of psychometric tools for its assessment. The 2 steps of the present article are defining the construct of hope by completing a preliminary review of the literature and analyzing the tools used to assess hope in the setting of oncologic medicine, conducting a systematic review of the existing scientific literature.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Our study was conducted in 2 stages. The first stage involved a nonsystematic preliminary review of the literature, the second a systematic search in all the medical journals contained in the Medline database as of 2012. The literature identified at the first stage was divided according to several topical categories, i.e., theoretical, empirical, and clinical works on the construct of hope. In the second systematic search, we identified the main psychometric tools used to measure hope in the field of clinical oncology and assessed their validity.

RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were identified. What emerged when we pooled the findings of our 2 lines of research was that, despite its broad theoretical definitions, the construct of hope can be broken down to a few constituent elements when hope is studied using currently available psychometric tools. In particular, these identified constituent elements were coping, spiritual well-being, quality of life, distress, and depression.

CONCLUSIONS: The factors contained in the construct of hope include temporality, future, expectancy, motivation, and interconnectedness. The review of the scientific literature does not reveal a clear definition of hope. Multidisciplinary studies are needed to communicate different perspectives (medical, psychological, spiritual, theological) among each other for better definition of the constituent elements of hope in order to support the hope with specific interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-500
Number of pages10
JournalTumori
Volume101
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Hope
Psychometrics
Literature
Medical Oncology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Hope in severe disease : a review of the literature on the construct and the tools for assessing hope in the psycho-oncologic setting. / Piccinelli, Claudia; Clerici, Carlo A lfredo; Veneroni, Laura; Ferrari, Andrea; Proserpio, Tullio.

In: Tumori, Vol. 101, No. 5, 01.09.2015, p. 491-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{996f6b306bd04eb7843fe7374d14157c,
title = "Hope in severe disease: a review of the literature on the construct and the tools for assessing hope in the psycho-oncologic setting",
abstract = "AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Research on the topic of hope began a long time ago but, more recently, interest in this construct has focused mainly on the development of psychometric tools for its assessment. The 2 steps of the present article are defining the construct of hope by completing a preliminary review of the literature and analyzing the tools used to assess hope in the setting of oncologic medicine, conducting a systematic review of the existing scientific literature.METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Our study was conducted in 2 stages. The first stage involved a nonsystematic preliminary review of the literature, the second a systematic search in all the medical journals contained in the Medline database as of 2012. The literature identified at the first stage was divided according to several topical categories, i.e., theoretical, empirical, and clinical works on the construct of hope. In the second systematic search, we identified the main psychometric tools used to measure hope in the field of clinical oncology and assessed their validity.RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were identified. What emerged when we pooled the findings of our 2 lines of research was that, despite its broad theoretical definitions, the construct of hope can be broken down to a few constituent elements when hope is studied using currently available psychometric tools. In particular, these identified constituent elements were coping, spiritual well-being, quality of life, distress, and depression.CONCLUSIONS: The factors contained in the construct of hope include temporality, future, expectancy, motivation, and interconnectedness. The review of the scientific literature does not reveal a clear definition of hope. Multidisciplinary studies are needed to communicate different perspectives (medical, psychological, spiritual, theological) among each other for better definition of the constituent elements of hope in order to support the hope with specific interventions.",
author = "Claudia Piccinelli and Clerici, {Carlo A lfredo} and Laura Veneroni and Andrea Ferrari and Tullio Proserpio",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5301/tj.5000349",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "491--500",
journal = "Tumori",
issn = "0300-8916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hope in severe disease

T2 - a review of the literature on the construct and the tools for assessing hope in the psycho-oncologic setting

AU - Piccinelli, Claudia

AU - Clerici, Carlo A lfredo

AU - Veneroni, Laura

AU - Ferrari, Andrea

AU - Proserpio, Tullio

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Research on the topic of hope began a long time ago but, more recently, interest in this construct has focused mainly on the development of psychometric tools for its assessment. The 2 steps of the present article are defining the construct of hope by completing a preliminary review of the literature and analyzing the tools used to assess hope in the setting of oncologic medicine, conducting a systematic review of the existing scientific literature.METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Our study was conducted in 2 stages. The first stage involved a nonsystematic preliminary review of the literature, the second a systematic search in all the medical journals contained in the Medline database as of 2012. The literature identified at the first stage was divided according to several topical categories, i.e., theoretical, empirical, and clinical works on the construct of hope. In the second systematic search, we identified the main psychometric tools used to measure hope in the field of clinical oncology and assessed their validity.RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were identified. What emerged when we pooled the findings of our 2 lines of research was that, despite its broad theoretical definitions, the construct of hope can be broken down to a few constituent elements when hope is studied using currently available psychometric tools. In particular, these identified constituent elements were coping, spiritual well-being, quality of life, distress, and depression.CONCLUSIONS: The factors contained in the construct of hope include temporality, future, expectancy, motivation, and interconnectedness. The review of the scientific literature does not reveal a clear definition of hope. Multidisciplinary studies are needed to communicate different perspectives (medical, psychological, spiritual, theological) among each other for better definition of the constituent elements of hope in order to support the hope with specific interventions.

AB - AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Research on the topic of hope began a long time ago but, more recently, interest in this construct has focused mainly on the development of psychometric tools for its assessment. The 2 steps of the present article are defining the construct of hope by completing a preliminary review of the literature and analyzing the tools used to assess hope in the setting of oncologic medicine, conducting a systematic review of the existing scientific literature.METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Our study was conducted in 2 stages. The first stage involved a nonsystematic preliminary review of the literature, the second a systematic search in all the medical journals contained in the Medline database as of 2012. The literature identified at the first stage was divided according to several topical categories, i.e., theoretical, empirical, and clinical works on the construct of hope. In the second systematic search, we identified the main psychometric tools used to measure hope in the field of clinical oncology and assessed their validity.RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were identified. What emerged when we pooled the findings of our 2 lines of research was that, despite its broad theoretical definitions, the construct of hope can be broken down to a few constituent elements when hope is studied using currently available psychometric tools. In particular, these identified constituent elements were coping, spiritual well-being, quality of life, distress, and depression.CONCLUSIONS: The factors contained in the construct of hope include temporality, future, expectancy, motivation, and interconnectedness. The review of the scientific literature does not reveal a clear definition of hope. Multidisciplinary studies are needed to communicate different perspectives (medical, psychological, spiritual, theological) among each other for better definition of the constituent elements of hope in order to support the hope with specific interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955663016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955663016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5301/tj.5000349

DO - 10.5301/tj.5000349

M3 - Article

C2 - 25953443

AN - SCOPUS:84955663016

VL - 101

SP - 491

EP - 500

JO - Tumori

JF - Tumori

SN - 0300-8916

IS - 5

ER -