Hopelessness and its correlates with clinical outcomes in an outpatient setting

Gianluca Serafini, Dorian A. Lamis, Andrea Aguglia, Andrea Amerio, Jacopo Nebbia, Pierre Alexis Geoffroy, Maurizio Pompili, Mario Amore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined whether patients with hopelessness and those without may significantly differ regarding their main presentations and clinical course in a large Italian population. Methods: The recruited sample included 583 currently euthymic outpatients with major affective disorders. The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) assessed hopelessness using a cutoff score of 9 or higher. Participants were categorized based on the presence/absence of hopelessness. A binary logistic regression analysis -accounting for age and gender and considering history of psychotherapy, emotional/physical abuse, depressive symptoms, Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) total score, difficulties identifying and communicating feelings as potential predictors- was carried out in order to detect the variables associated with hopelessness. Results: Individuals with hopelessness, compared to those without, were more likely to be older (p=0.005), females (p=0.01), to have a unipolar depressive disorder (p≤0.05), be prescribed antidepressants and psychotherapy in the past (p=0.001 and p≤0.05). Moreover, individuals with hopelessness scored higher on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (p≤0.05) and on the emotional (p=<0.001), physical abuse (p≤0.01) and physical neglect (p≤0.05) subscales of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire - Short form, and reported more difficulties identifying (p≤0.001) and communicating feelings (p≤0.001) than those without hopelessness. The multivariate analysis showed that having difficulties identifying feelings is independently associated with hopelessness. Discussion: These findings indicate that individuals with difficulties identifying feelings are at higher risk of hopelessness and of negative outcomes. Further studies need to explore the impact of alexithymia on hopelessness and clinical outcomes in the lifetime illness course.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-479
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume263
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 15 2020

Keywords

  • Alexithymia
  • Beck hopelessness scale
  • Difficulties identifying and communicating feelings
  • Hopelessness
  • Major affective disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Hopelessness and its correlates with clinical outcomes in an outpatient setting. / Serafini, Gianluca; Lamis, Dorian A.; Aguglia, Andrea; Amerio, Andrea; Nebbia, Jacopo; Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis; Pompili, Maurizio; Amore, Mario.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 263, 15.02.2020, p. 472-479.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Serafini, Gianluca ; Lamis, Dorian A. ; Aguglia, Andrea ; Amerio, Andrea ; Nebbia, Jacopo ; Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis ; Pompili, Maurizio ; Amore, Mario. / Hopelessness and its correlates with clinical outcomes in an outpatient setting. In: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2020 ; Vol. 263. pp. 472-479.
@article{09ac6bb7fd094394b973752e670dfc36,
title = "Hopelessness and its correlates with clinical outcomes in an outpatient setting",
abstract = "Introduction: This study examined whether patients with hopelessness and those without may significantly differ regarding their main presentations and clinical course in a large Italian population. Methods: The recruited sample included 583 currently euthymic outpatients with major affective disorders. The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) assessed hopelessness using a cutoff score of 9 or higher. Participants were categorized based on the presence/absence of hopelessness. A binary logistic regression analysis -accounting for age and gender and considering history of psychotherapy, emotional/physical abuse, depressive symptoms, Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) total score, difficulties identifying and communicating feelings as potential predictors- was carried out in order to detect the variables associated with hopelessness. Results: Individuals with hopelessness, compared to those without, were more likely to be older (p=0.005), females (p=0.01), to have a unipolar depressive disorder (p≤0.05), be prescribed antidepressants and psychotherapy in the past (p=0.001 and p≤0.05). Moreover, individuals with hopelessness scored higher on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (p≤0.05) and on the emotional (p=<0.001), physical abuse (p≤0.01) and physical neglect (p≤0.05) subscales of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire - Short form, and reported more difficulties identifying (p≤0.001) and communicating feelings (p≤0.001) than those without hopelessness. The multivariate analysis showed that having difficulties identifying feelings is independently associated with hopelessness. Discussion: These findings indicate that individuals with difficulties identifying feelings are at higher risk of hopelessness and of negative outcomes. Further studies need to explore the impact of alexithymia on hopelessness and clinical outcomes in the lifetime illness course.",
keywords = "Alexithymia, Beck hopelessness scale, Difficulties identifying and communicating feelings, Hopelessness, Major affective disorders",
author = "Gianluca Serafini and Lamis, {Dorian A.} and Andrea Aguglia and Andrea Amerio and Jacopo Nebbia and Geoffroy, {Pierre Alexis} and Maurizio Pompili and Mario Amore",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.144",
language = "English",
volume = "263",
pages = "472--479",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hopelessness and its correlates with clinical outcomes in an outpatient setting

AU - Serafini, Gianluca

AU - Lamis, Dorian A.

AU - Aguglia, Andrea

AU - Amerio, Andrea

AU - Nebbia, Jacopo

AU - Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis

AU - Pompili, Maurizio

AU - Amore, Mario

PY - 2020/2/15

Y1 - 2020/2/15

N2 - Introduction: This study examined whether patients with hopelessness and those without may significantly differ regarding their main presentations and clinical course in a large Italian population. Methods: The recruited sample included 583 currently euthymic outpatients with major affective disorders. The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) assessed hopelessness using a cutoff score of 9 or higher. Participants were categorized based on the presence/absence of hopelessness. A binary logistic regression analysis -accounting for age and gender and considering history of psychotherapy, emotional/physical abuse, depressive symptoms, Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) total score, difficulties identifying and communicating feelings as potential predictors- was carried out in order to detect the variables associated with hopelessness. Results: Individuals with hopelessness, compared to those without, were more likely to be older (p=0.005), females (p=0.01), to have a unipolar depressive disorder (p≤0.05), be prescribed antidepressants and psychotherapy in the past (p=0.001 and p≤0.05). Moreover, individuals with hopelessness scored higher on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (p≤0.05) and on the emotional (p=<0.001), physical abuse (p≤0.01) and physical neglect (p≤0.05) subscales of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire - Short form, and reported more difficulties identifying (p≤0.001) and communicating feelings (p≤0.001) than those without hopelessness. The multivariate analysis showed that having difficulties identifying feelings is independently associated with hopelessness. Discussion: These findings indicate that individuals with difficulties identifying feelings are at higher risk of hopelessness and of negative outcomes. Further studies need to explore the impact of alexithymia on hopelessness and clinical outcomes in the lifetime illness course.

AB - Introduction: This study examined whether patients with hopelessness and those without may significantly differ regarding their main presentations and clinical course in a large Italian population. Methods: The recruited sample included 583 currently euthymic outpatients with major affective disorders. The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) assessed hopelessness using a cutoff score of 9 or higher. Participants were categorized based on the presence/absence of hopelessness. A binary logistic regression analysis -accounting for age and gender and considering history of psychotherapy, emotional/physical abuse, depressive symptoms, Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) total score, difficulties identifying and communicating feelings as potential predictors- was carried out in order to detect the variables associated with hopelessness. Results: Individuals with hopelessness, compared to those without, were more likely to be older (p=0.005), females (p=0.01), to have a unipolar depressive disorder (p≤0.05), be prescribed antidepressants and psychotherapy in the past (p=0.001 and p≤0.05). Moreover, individuals with hopelessness scored higher on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (p≤0.05) and on the emotional (p=<0.001), physical abuse (p≤0.01) and physical neglect (p≤0.05) subscales of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire - Short form, and reported more difficulties identifying (p≤0.001) and communicating feelings (p≤0.001) than those without hopelessness. The multivariate analysis showed that having difficulties identifying feelings is independently associated with hopelessness. Discussion: These findings indicate that individuals with difficulties identifying feelings are at higher risk of hopelessness and of negative outcomes. Further studies need to explore the impact of alexithymia on hopelessness and clinical outcomes in the lifetime illness course.

KW - Alexithymia

KW - Beck hopelessness scale

KW - Difficulties identifying and communicating feelings

KW - Hopelessness

KW - Major affective disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077301683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077301683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.144

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.144

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85077301683

VL - 263

SP - 472

EP - 479

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -