How can we evaluate interference in attentional tests? A study based on Bi-variate non-parametric tolerance limits

Erminio Capitani, Marcella Laiacona, Riccardo Barbarotto, Federico M. Cossa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In attentional tasks a basic performance is often contrasted with the same task administered with some additional load, defined here as 'interference'. However, it is questionable how interference should be quantified. The raw difference between the interference-loaded ('complex') task and the basic task is marred by measurement artefacts. There are alternative ways, but the choice of which solution to employ appears arbitrary. Bivariate non-parametric tolerance limits were introduced as they retain the information linked to the bivariate nature of the observation, and in this study we compared the different approaches for evaluating interference using real data from 209 normal participants who performed Visual Reaction Times (basic and go/no-go) and the Stroop Test. Our analysis indicated that, among the univariate indices, the use of the complex score covaried for the basic score yields the most satisfactory evaluation of interference; however, its use can be decided only after data inspection. Bivariate non-parametric tolerance limits offer advantages in terms of generality of use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-228
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Stroop Test
Artifacts
Reaction Time
Observation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

How can we evaluate interference in attentional tests? A study based on Bi-variate non-parametric tolerance limits. / Capitani, Erminio; Laiacona, Marcella; Barbarotto, Riccardo; Cossa, Federico M.

In: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1999, p. 216-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Capitani, Erminio ; Laiacona, Marcella ; Barbarotto, Riccardo ; Cossa, Federico M. / How can we evaluate interference in attentional tests? A study based on Bi-variate non-parametric tolerance limits. In: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 1999 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 216-228.
@article{3565259c24884da593f58ce028127aca,
title = "How can we evaluate interference in attentional tests? A study based on Bi-variate non-parametric tolerance limits",
abstract = "In attentional tasks a basic performance is often contrasted with the same task administered with some additional load, defined here as 'interference'. However, it is questionable how interference should be quantified. The raw difference between the interference-loaded ('complex') task and the basic task is marred by measurement artefacts. There are alternative ways, but the choice of which solution to employ appears arbitrary. Bivariate non-parametric tolerance limits were introduced as they retain the information linked to the bivariate nature of the observation, and in this study we compared the different approaches for evaluating interference using real data from 209 normal participants who performed Visual Reaction Times (basic and go/no-go) and the Stroop Test. Our analysis indicated that, among the univariate indices, the use of the complex score covaried for the basic score yields the most satisfactory evaluation of interference; however, its use can be decided only after data inspection. Bivariate non-parametric tolerance limits offer advantages in terms of generality of use.",
author = "Erminio Capitani and Marcella Laiacona and Riccardo Barbarotto and Cossa, {Federico M.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1076/jcen.21.2.216.934",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "216--228",
journal = "Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology",
issn = "1380-3395",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How can we evaluate interference in attentional tests? A study based on Bi-variate non-parametric tolerance limits

AU - Capitani, Erminio

AU - Laiacona, Marcella

AU - Barbarotto, Riccardo

AU - Cossa, Federico M.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - In attentional tasks a basic performance is often contrasted with the same task administered with some additional load, defined here as 'interference'. However, it is questionable how interference should be quantified. The raw difference between the interference-loaded ('complex') task and the basic task is marred by measurement artefacts. There are alternative ways, but the choice of which solution to employ appears arbitrary. Bivariate non-parametric tolerance limits were introduced as they retain the information linked to the bivariate nature of the observation, and in this study we compared the different approaches for evaluating interference using real data from 209 normal participants who performed Visual Reaction Times (basic and go/no-go) and the Stroop Test. Our analysis indicated that, among the univariate indices, the use of the complex score covaried for the basic score yields the most satisfactory evaluation of interference; however, its use can be decided only after data inspection. Bivariate non-parametric tolerance limits offer advantages in terms of generality of use.

AB - In attentional tasks a basic performance is often contrasted with the same task administered with some additional load, defined here as 'interference'. However, it is questionable how interference should be quantified. The raw difference between the interference-loaded ('complex') task and the basic task is marred by measurement artefacts. There are alternative ways, but the choice of which solution to employ appears arbitrary. Bivariate non-parametric tolerance limits were introduced as they retain the information linked to the bivariate nature of the observation, and in this study we compared the different approaches for evaluating interference using real data from 209 normal participants who performed Visual Reaction Times (basic and go/no-go) and the Stroop Test. Our analysis indicated that, among the univariate indices, the use of the complex score covaried for the basic score yields the most satisfactory evaluation of interference; however, its use can be decided only after data inspection. Bivariate non-parametric tolerance limits offer advantages in terms of generality of use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032842054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032842054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1076/jcen.21.2.216.934

DO - 10.1076/jcen.21.2.216.934

M3 - Article

C2 - 10425518

AN - SCOPUS:0032842054

VL - 21

SP - 216

EP - 228

JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

SN - 1380-3395

IS - 2

ER -