How clinical practitioners assess frailty in their daily practice

an international survey

Olivier Bruyère, Fanny Buckinx, Charlotte Beaudart, Jean Yves Reginster, Juergen Bauer, Tommy Cederholm, Antonio Cherubini, Cyrus Cooper, Alfonso Jose Cruz-Jentoft, Francesco Landi, Stefania Maggi, René Rizzoli, Avan Aihie Sayer, Cornel Sieber, Bruno Vellas, Matteo Cesari, on behalf of ESCEO and the EUGMS frailty working group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Various operational definitions have been proposed to assess the frailty condition among older individuals. Our objective was to assess how practitioners measure the geriatric syndrome of frailty in their daily routine. Methods: An online survey was sent to national geriatric societies affiliated to the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) and to members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Results: A total of 388 clinicians from 44 countries answered to the survey. Most of them were medical doctors (93%), and their primary field of practice was geriatrics (83%). Two hundred and five clinicians (52.8%) always assessed frailty in their daily practice, 38.1% reported to “sometimes” measure it, and 9.1% never assess it. A substantial proportion of clinicians (64.9%) diagnose frailty using more than one instrument. The most widely used tool was the gait speed test, adopted by 43.8% of the clinicians, followed by clinical frailty scale (34.3%), the SPPB test (30.2%), the frailty phenotype (26.8%) and the frailty index (16.8%). Conclusion: A variety of tools is used to assess frailty of older patients in clinical practice highlighting the need for standardisation and guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)905-912
Number of pages8
JournalAging clinical and experimental research
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Geriatrics
Musculoskeletal Diseases
European Union
Osteoarthritis
Osteoporosis
Economics
Medicine
Guidelines
Phenotype
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Clinical practice
  • Frailty
  • Standardisation
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ageing
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Bruyère, O., Buckinx, F., Beaudart, C., Reginster, J. Y., Bauer, J., Cederholm, T., ... on behalf of ESCEO and the EUGMS frailty working group (2017). How clinical practitioners assess frailty in their daily practice: an international survey. Aging clinical and experimental research, 29(5), 905-912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0806-8

How clinical practitioners assess frailty in their daily practice : an international survey. / Bruyère, Olivier; Buckinx, Fanny; Beaudart, Charlotte; Reginster, Jean Yves; Bauer, Juergen; Cederholm, Tommy; Cherubini, Antonio; Cooper, Cyrus; Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso Jose; Landi, Francesco; Maggi, Stefania; Rizzoli, René; Sayer, Avan Aihie; Sieber, Cornel; Vellas, Bruno; Cesari, Matteo; on behalf of ESCEO and the EUGMS frailty working group.

In: Aging clinical and experimental research, Vol. 29, No. 5, 01.10.2017, p. 905-912.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bruyère, O, Buckinx, F, Beaudart, C, Reginster, JY, Bauer, J, Cederholm, T, Cherubini, A, Cooper, C, Cruz-Jentoft, AJ, Landi, F, Maggi, S, Rizzoli, R, Sayer, AA, Sieber, C, Vellas, B, Cesari, M & on behalf of ESCEO and the EUGMS frailty working group 2017, 'How clinical practitioners assess frailty in their daily practice: an international survey', Aging clinical and experimental research, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 905-912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0806-8
Bruyère, Olivier ; Buckinx, Fanny ; Beaudart, Charlotte ; Reginster, Jean Yves ; Bauer, Juergen ; Cederholm, Tommy ; Cherubini, Antonio ; Cooper, Cyrus ; Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso Jose ; Landi, Francesco ; Maggi, Stefania ; Rizzoli, René ; Sayer, Avan Aihie ; Sieber, Cornel ; Vellas, Bruno ; Cesari, Matteo ; on behalf of ESCEO and the EUGMS frailty working group. / How clinical practitioners assess frailty in their daily practice : an international survey. In: Aging clinical and experimental research. 2017 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 905-912.
@article{86a0563771684248953396e3a0eb1aac,
title = "How clinical practitioners assess frailty in their daily practice: an international survey",
abstract = "Introduction: Various operational definitions have been proposed to assess the frailty condition among older individuals. Our objective was to assess how practitioners measure the geriatric syndrome of frailty in their daily routine. Methods: An online survey was sent to national geriatric societies affiliated to the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) and to members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Results: A total of 388 clinicians from 44 countries answered to the survey. Most of them were medical doctors (93{\%}), and their primary field of practice was geriatrics (83{\%}). Two hundred and five clinicians (52.8{\%}) always assessed frailty in their daily practice, 38.1{\%} reported to “sometimes” measure it, and 9.1{\%} never assess it. A substantial proportion of clinicians (64.9{\%}) diagnose frailty using more than one instrument. The most widely used tool was the gait speed test, adopted by 43.8{\%} of the clinicians, followed by clinical frailty scale (34.3{\%}), the SPPB test (30.2{\%}), the frailty phenotype (26.8{\%}) and the frailty index (16.8{\%}). Conclusion: A variety of tools is used to assess frailty of older patients in clinical practice highlighting the need for standardisation and guidelines.",
keywords = "Clinical practice, Frailty, Standardisation, Survey",
author = "Olivier Bruy{\`e}re and Fanny Buckinx and Charlotte Beaudart and Reginster, {Jean Yves} and Juergen Bauer and Tommy Cederholm and Antonio Cherubini and Cyrus Cooper and Cruz-Jentoft, {Alfonso Jose} and Francesco Landi and Stefania Maggi and Ren{\'e} Rizzoli and Sayer, {Avan Aihie} and Cornel Sieber and Bruno Vellas and Matteo Cesari and {on behalf of ESCEO and the EUGMS frailty working group}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40520-017-0806-8",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "905--912",
journal = "Aging clinical and experimental research",
issn = "1594-0667",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How clinical practitioners assess frailty in their daily practice

T2 - an international survey

AU - Bruyère, Olivier

AU - Buckinx, Fanny

AU - Beaudart, Charlotte

AU - Reginster, Jean Yves

AU - Bauer, Juergen

AU - Cederholm, Tommy

AU - Cherubini, Antonio

AU - Cooper, Cyrus

AU - Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso Jose

AU - Landi, Francesco

AU - Maggi, Stefania

AU - Rizzoli, René

AU - Sayer, Avan Aihie

AU - Sieber, Cornel

AU - Vellas, Bruno

AU - Cesari, Matteo

AU - on behalf of ESCEO and the EUGMS frailty working group

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Introduction: Various operational definitions have been proposed to assess the frailty condition among older individuals. Our objective was to assess how practitioners measure the geriatric syndrome of frailty in their daily routine. Methods: An online survey was sent to national geriatric societies affiliated to the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) and to members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Results: A total of 388 clinicians from 44 countries answered to the survey. Most of them were medical doctors (93%), and their primary field of practice was geriatrics (83%). Two hundred and five clinicians (52.8%) always assessed frailty in their daily practice, 38.1% reported to “sometimes” measure it, and 9.1% never assess it. A substantial proportion of clinicians (64.9%) diagnose frailty using more than one instrument. The most widely used tool was the gait speed test, adopted by 43.8% of the clinicians, followed by clinical frailty scale (34.3%), the SPPB test (30.2%), the frailty phenotype (26.8%) and the frailty index (16.8%). Conclusion: A variety of tools is used to assess frailty of older patients in clinical practice highlighting the need for standardisation and guidelines.

AB - Introduction: Various operational definitions have been proposed to assess the frailty condition among older individuals. Our objective was to assess how practitioners measure the geriatric syndrome of frailty in their daily routine. Methods: An online survey was sent to national geriatric societies affiliated to the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) and to members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Results: A total of 388 clinicians from 44 countries answered to the survey. Most of them were medical doctors (93%), and their primary field of practice was geriatrics (83%). Two hundred and five clinicians (52.8%) always assessed frailty in their daily practice, 38.1% reported to “sometimes” measure it, and 9.1% never assess it. A substantial proportion of clinicians (64.9%) diagnose frailty using more than one instrument. The most widely used tool was the gait speed test, adopted by 43.8% of the clinicians, followed by clinical frailty scale (34.3%), the SPPB test (30.2%), the frailty phenotype (26.8%) and the frailty index (16.8%). Conclusion: A variety of tools is used to assess frailty of older patients in clinical practice highlighting the need for standardisation and guidelines.

KW - Clinical practice

KW - Frailty

KW - Standardisation

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026781583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026781583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40520-017-0806-8

DO - 10.1007/s40520-017-0806-8

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 905

EP - 912

JO - Aging clinical and experimental research

JF - Aging clinical and experimental research

SN - 1594-0667

IS - 5

ER -