How do different movement references influence ERP related to gait initiation? A comparative methods’ assessment

Yuri Russo, Marika Berchicci, Francesco Di Russo, Giuseppe Vannozzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Movement-Related Cortical Potentials (MRCPs) are widely used in studying brain dynamics of motor control. However, limited information is available on complex tasks such as locomotion for which the appropriate identification of gait initiation trigger is still a technical challenge. Thus, it is conceivable that recorded brain activity may vary due to the instrument used to provide the temporal trigger. Therefore, a comparative assessment was performed to determine whether and how trigger identification techniques affect the MRCP in gait initiation. New Method: Eleven able-bodied young participants performed 200 forward- and 200 backward-oriented self-initiated steps. Brain activity was recorded through 64-channel electroencephalography. Four different triggering techniques were tested based on measurements of surface electromyography, stereophotogrammetry and forceplates. Results: Repeated-Measures ANOVAs on the mean amplitude of the Bereitschaftspotential and on both peak amplitude and latency of the motor potential showed a main effect of the triggering technique (p < 0.003). Specifically, force plates signal amplitude (−11.56 ± 1.4 μV) was larger than stereophotogrammetry (−5.0±0.5 μV and −6.5 ± 1 μV) and electromyography (−7.2 ± 0.9 μV). Comparison with Existing Method(s): Considering the gait initiation task, no previous study has performed a comparison between the MRCPs observed by triggering the same signal with different approaches. Conclusion: Different instruments identify triggers that vary in terms of time delay, resulting in different amplitudes and timing of the MRCPs. The comparative analysis indicates that forceplate allows to obtain the best MRCP trigger to study gait initiation, in terms of signal strength, cost and set up time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-101
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volume311
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Gait
Photogrammetry
Electromyography
Brain
Contingent Negative Variation
Locomotion
Electroencephalography
Analysis of Variance
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Locomotion
  • Motion capture
  • Motor potential
  • Stepping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

How do different movement references influence ERP related to gait initiation? A comparative methods’ assessment. / Russo, Yuri; Berchicci, Marika; Di Russo, Francesco; Vannozzi, Giuseppe.

In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 311, 01.01.2019, p. 95-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{895de91763b64a87ba8c345a04dafeef,
title = "How do different movement references influence ERP related to gait initiation? A comparative methods’ assessment",
abstract = "Background: Movement-Related Cortical Potentials (MRCPs) are widely used in studying brain dynamics of motor control. However, limited information is available on complex tasks such as locomotion for which the appropriate identification of gait initiation trigger is still a technical challenge. Thus, it is conceivable that recorded brain activity may vary due to the instrument used to provide the temporal trigger. Therefore, a comparative assessment was performed to determine whether and how trigger identification techniques affect the MRCP in gait initiation. New Method: Eleven able-bodied young participants performed 200 forward- and 200 backward-oriented self-initiated steps. Brain activity was recorded through 64-channel electroencephalography. Four different triggering techniques were tested based on measurements of surface electromyography, stereophotogrammetry and forceplates. Results: Repeated-Measures ANOVAs on the mean amplitude of the Bereitschaftspotential and on both peak amplitude and latency of the motor potential showed a main effect of the triggering technique (p < 0.003). Specifically, force plates signal amplitude (−11.56 ± 1.4 μV) was larger than stereophotogrammetry (−5.0±0.5 μV and −6.5 ± 1 μV) and electromyography (−7.2 ± 0.9 μV). Comparison with Existing Method(s): Considering the gait initiation task, no previous study has performed a comparison between the MRCPs observed by triggering the same signal with different approaches. Conclusion: Different instruments identify triggers that vary in terms of time delay, resulting in different amplitudes and timing of the MRCPs. The comparative analysis indicates that forceplate allows to obtain the best MRCP trigger to study gait initiation, in terms of signal strength, cost and set up time.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Locomotion, Motion capture, Motor potential, Stepping",
author = "Yuri Russo and Marika Berchicci and {Di Russo}, Francesco and Giuseppe Vannozzi",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.10.006",
language = "English",
volume = "311",
pages = "95--101",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Methods",
issn = "0165-0270",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do different movement references influence ERP related to gait initiation? A comparative methods’ assessment

AU - Russo, Yuri

AU - Berchicci, Marika

AU - Di Russo, Francesco

AU - Vannozzi, Giuseppe

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Movement-Related Cortical Potentials (MRCPs) are widely used in studying brain dynamics of motor control. However, limited information is available on complex tasks such as locomotion for which the appropriate identification of gait initiation trigger is still a technical challenge. Thus, it is conceivable that recorded brain activity may vary due to the instrument used to provide the temporal trigger. Therefore, a comparative assessment was performed to determine whether and how trigger identification techniques affect the MRCP in gait initiation. New Method: Eleven able-bodied young participants performed 200 forward- and 200 backward-oriented self-initiated steps. Brain activity was recorded through 64-channel electroencephalography. Four different triggering techniques were tested based on measurements of surface electromyography, stereophotogrammetry and forceplates. Results: Repeated-Measures ANOVAs on the mean amplitude of the Bereitschaftspotential and on both peak amplitude and latency of the motor potential showed a main effect of the triggering technique (p < 0.003). Specifically, force plates signal amplitude (−11.56 ± 1.4 μV) was larger than stereophotogrammetry (−5.0±0.5 μV and −6.5 ± 1 μV) and electromyography (−7.2 ± 0.9 μV). Comparison with Existing Method(s): Considering the gait initiation task, no previous study has performed a comparison between the MRCPs observed by triggering the same signal with different approaches. Conclusion: Different instruments identify triggers that vary in terms of time delay, resulting in different amplitudes and timing of the MRCPs. The comparative analysis indicates that forceplate allows to obtain the best MRCP trigger to study gait initiation, in terms of signal strength, cost and set up time.

AB - Background: Movement-Related Cortical Potentials (MRCPs) are widely used in studying brain dynamics of motor control. However, limited information is available on complex tasks such as locomotion for which the appropriate identification of gait initiation trigger is still a technical challenge. Thus, it is conceivable that recorded brain activity may vary due to the instrument used to provide the temporal trigger. Therefore, a comparative assessment was performed to determine whether and how trigger identification techniques affect the MRCP in gait initiation. New Method: Eleven able-bodied young participants performed 200 forward- and 200 backward-oriented self-initiated steps. Brain activity was recorded through 64-channel electroencephalography. Four different triggering techniques were tested based on measurements of surface electromyography, stereophotogrammetry and forceplates. Results: Repeated-Measures ANOVAs on the mean amplitude of the Bereitschaftspotential and on both peak amplitude and latency of the motor potential showed a main effect of the triggering technique (p < 0.003). Specifically, force plates signal amplitude (−11.56 ± 1.4 μV) was larger than stereophotogrammetry (−5.0±0.5 μV and −6.5 ± 1 μV) and electromyography (−7.2 ± 0.9 μV). Comparison with Existing Method(s): Considering the gait initiation task, no previous study has performed a comparison between the MRCPs observed by triggering the same signal with different approaches. Conclusion: Different instruments identify triggers that vary in terms of time delay, resulting in different amplitudes and timing of the MRCPs. The comparative analysis indicates that forceplate allows to obtain the best MRCP trigger to study gait initiation, in terms of signal strength, cost and set up time.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Locomotion

KW - Motion capture

KW - Motor potential

KW - Stepping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055287412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055287412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.10.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 30326203

AN - SCOPUS:85055287412

VL - 311

SP - 95

EP - 101

JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

SN - 0165-0270

ER -