How do patients improve their timed up and go test? Responsiveness to rehabilitation of the TUG test in elderly neurological patients

Antonio Caronni, Michela Picardi, Evdoxia Aristidou, Paola Antoniotti, Giuseppe Pintavalle, Valentina Redaelli, Irma Sterpi, Massimo Corbo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The timed up and go (TUG) test is widely used for assessing treatments effectiveness on elderly mobility. Although the TUG test consists of different tasks (e.g. walking and turning), the total TUG duration (TTD) is usually the only outcome measure, with TTD shortening indicating the patient's improvement. Research question: Does TTD shortening reflect the improvement of each TUG tasks or does it reflect the improvement of only some of them? Methods: This retrospective study recruited 120 elderly patients (mean, SD: 76.9, 6.6 years) admitted to inpatient rehabilitation because of an acute or chronic neurological disease (acute patients, AP; chronic patients, CP). TTD and TUG tasks duration was measured on admission and discharge (five trials/session) by means of the instrumental TUG test (ITUG). Likelihood ratios (LRs) were used for inferring TUG tasks improvement from TTD improvement. TTD and TUG tasks have improved if at least four measurements on discharge were shorter than the shortest measurement on admission. Results: TTD improvement per se is not enough to claim that all the TUG tasks have improved (LR + AP = 1.32; LR + CP = 1.85). Conversely, if TTD has not improved, not even a single TUG task has improved (LR AP = 0.13; LR CP = 0.19). If TTD has improved, there is at least one TUG task that actually improved (LR + AP = 3.17; LR + CP = 9.54). The improvement of all TUG tasks can be only inferred in the (unusual) event of a large TTD shortening (AP: >39%, LR + AP = 6.26; CP: >30%, LR + CP = 9.0). Significance: In most cases, TTD improvement is not associated with the improvement of all TUG tasks. Moreover, when TTD has improved there is at least a TUG task that has improved, but that remains unknown. To actually understand how treatments ameliorate patients’ mobility, ITUG with TUG task duration measurement should be preferred to TTD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-38
Number of pages6
JournalGait and Posture
Volume70
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Walking
Inpatients
Chronic Disease
Retrospective Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Balance and locomotor impairment
  • Elderly
  • Instrumental timed up and go test
  • ITUG
  • Rehabilitation
  • Responsiveness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

How do patients improve their timed up and go test? Responsiveness to rehabilitation of the TUG test in elderly neurological patients. / Caronni, Antonio; Picardi, Michela; Aristidou, Evdoxia; Antoniotti, Paola; Pintavalle, Giuseppe; Redaelli, Valentina; Sterpi, Irma; Corbo, Massimo.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 70, 01.05.2019, p. 33-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caronni, A, Picardi, M, Aristidou, E, Antoniotti, P, Pintavalle, G, Redaelli, V, Sterpi, I & Corbo, M 2019, 'How do patients improve their timed up and go test? Responsiveness to rehabilitation of the TUG test in elderly neurological patients', Gait and Posture, vol. 70, pp. 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.02.010
Caronni, Antonio ; Picardi, Michela ; Aristidou, Evdoxia ; Antoniotti, Paola ; Pintavalle, Giuseppe ; Redaelli, Valentina ; Sterpi, Irma ; Corbo, Massimo. / How do patients improve their timed up and go test? Responsiveness to rehabilitation of the TUG test in elderly neurological patients. In: Gait and Posture. 2019 ; Vol. 70. pp. 33-38.
@article{e44d4e66c07e416b8ed14201ab38d29e,
title = "How do patients improve their timed up and go test? Responsiveness to rehabilitation of the TUG test in elderly neurological patients",
abstract = "Background: The timed up and go (TUG) test is widely used for assessing treatments effectiveness on elderly mobility. Although the TUG test consists of different tasks (e.g. walking and turning), the total TUG duration (TTD) is usually the only outcome measure, with TTD shortening indicating the patient's improvement. Research question: Does TTD shortening reflect the improvement of each TUG tasks or does it reflect the improvement of only some of them? Methods: This retrospective study recruited 120 elderly patients (mean, SD: 76.9, 6.6 years) admitted to inpatient rehabilitation because of an acute or chronic neurological disease (acute patients, AP; chronic patients, CP). TTD and TUG tasks duration was measured on admission and discharge (five trials/session) by means of the instrumental TUG test (ITUG). Likelihood ratios (LRs) were used for inferring TUG tasks improvement from TTD improvement. TTD and TUG tasks have improved if at least four measurements on discharge were shorter than the shortest measurement on admission. Results: TTD improvement per se is not enough to claim that all the TUG tasks have improved (LR + AP = 1.32; LR + CP = 1.85). Conversely, if TTD has not improved, not even a single TUG task has improved (LR − AP = 0.13; LR − CP = 0.19). If TTD has improved, there is at least one TUG task that actually improved (LR + AP = 3.17; LR + CP = 9.54). The improvement of all TUG tasks can be only inferred in the (unusual) event of a large TTD shortening (AP: >39{\%}, LR + AP = 6.26; CP: >30{\%}, LR + CP = 9.0). Significance: In most cases, TTD improvement is not associated with the improvement of all TUG tasks. Moreover, when TTD has improved there is at least a TUG task that has improved, but that remains unknown. To actually understand how treatments ameliorate patients’ mobility, ITUG with TUG task duration measurement should be preferred to TTD.",
keywords = "Balance and locomotor impairment, Elderly, Instrumental timed up and go test, ITUG, Rehabilitation, Responsiveness",
author = "Antonio Caronni and Michela Picardi and Evdoxia Aristidou and Paola Antoniotti and Giuseppe Pintavalle and Valentina Redaelli and Irma Sterpi and Massimo Corbo",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.02.010",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "33--38",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do patients improve their timed up and go test? Responsiveness to rehabilitation of the TUG test in elderly neurological patients

AU - Caronni, Antonio

AU - Picardi, Michela

AU - Aristidou, Evdoxia

AU - Antoniotti, Paola

AU - Pintavalle, Giuseppe

AU - Redaelli, Valentina

AU - Sterpi, Irma

AU - Corbo, Massimo

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Background: The timed up and go (TUG) test is widely used for assessing treatments effectiveness on elderly mobility. Although the TUG test consists of different tasks (e.g. walking and turning), the total TUG duration (TTD) is usually the only outcome measure, with TTD shortening indicating the patient's improvement. Research question: Does TTD shortening reflect the improvement of each TUG tasks or does it reflect the improvement of only some of them? Methods: This retrospective study recruited 120 elderly patients (mean, SD: 76.9, 6.6 years) admitted to inpatient rehabilitation because of an acute or chronic neurological disease (acute patients, AP; chronic patients, CP). TTD and TUG tasks duration was measured on admission and discharge (five trials/session) by means of the instrumental TUG test (ITUG). Likelihood ratios (LRs) were used for inferring TUG tasks improvement from TTD improvement. TTD and TUG tasks have improved if at least four measurements on discharge were shorter than the shortest measurement on admission. Results: TTD improvement per se is not enough to claim that all the TUG tasks have improved (LR + AP = 1.32; LR + CP = 1.85). Conversely, if TTD has not improved, not even a single TUG task has improved (LR − AP = 0.13; LR − CP = 0.19). If TTD has improved, there is at least one TUG task that actually improved (LR + AP = 3.17; LR + CP = 9.54). The improvement of all TUG tasks can be only inferred in the (unusual) event of a large TTD shortening (AP: >39%, LR + AP = 6.26; CP: >30%, LR + CP = 9.0). Significance: In most cases, TTD improvement is not associated with the improvement of all TUG tasks. Moreover, when TTD has improved there is at least a TUG task that has improved, but that remains unknown. To actually understand how treatments ameliorate patients’ mobility, ITUG with TUG task duration measurement should be preferred to TTD.

AB - Background: The timed up and go (TUG) test is widely used for assessing treatments effectiveness on elderly mobility. Although the TUG test consists of different tasks (e.g. walking and turning), the total TUG duration (TTD) is usually the only outcome measure, with TTD shortening indicating the patient's improvement. Research question: Does TTD shortening reflect the improvement of each TUG tasks or does it reflect the improvement of only some of them? Methods: This retrospective study recruited 120 elderly patients (mean, SD: 76.9, 6.6 years) admitted to inpatient rehabilitation because of an acute or chronic neurological disease (acute patients, AP; chronic patients, CP). TTD and TUG tasks duration was measured on admission and discharge (five trials/session) by means of the instrumental TUG test (ITUG). Likelihood ratios (LRs) were used for inferring TUG tasks improvement from TTD improvement. TTD and TUG tasks have improved if at least four measurements on discharge were shorter than the shortest measurement on admission. Results: TTD improvement per se is not enough to claim that all the TUG tasks have improved (LR + AP = 1.32; LR + CP = 1.85). Conversely, if TTD has not improved, not even a single TUG task has improved (LR − AP = 0.13; LR − CP = 0.19). If TTD has improved, there is at least one TUG task that actually improved (LR + AP = 3.17; LR + CP = 9.54). The improvement of all TUG tasks can be only inferred in the (unusual) event of a large TTD shortening (AP: >39%, LR + AP = 6.26; CP: >30%, LR + CP = 9.0). Significance: In most cases, TTD improvement is not associated with the improvement of all TUG tasks. Moreover, when TTD has improved there is at least a TUG task that has improved, but that remains unknown. To actually understand how treatments ameliorate patients’ mobility, ITUG with TUG task duration measurement should be preferred to TTD.

KW - Balance and locomotor impairment

KW - Elderly

KW - Instrumental timed up and go test

KW - ITUG

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Responsiveness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061722291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061722291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.02.010

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 33

EP - 38

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

ER -