How is shoulder ultrasound done in Italy?

A survey of clinical practice

Marcello Zappia, Alberto Aliprandi, Simona Pozza, Fabio Martino Doniselli, Salvatore Gitto, Luca Maria Sconfienza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define when an ultrasound examination of the shoulder can be considered complete and how many examinations currently performed in Italy are actually complete according to that definition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports and images of previously performed ultrasound examinations of the shoulder of patients seen in 2014 for interventional procedures were reviewed for the following items, according to guidelines published by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology: long biceps, subscapularis, supraspinatus, external rotators, acromioclavicular joint, subacromial bursa, subacromial space, coraco-acromial ligament, and the posterior recess. The first six items were considered mandatory in a complete shoulder ultrasound examination. The specialization of the performing physician was noted. The number of complete examinations performed by different physicians was compared with the number of incomplete examinations.

RESULTS: We analyzed 324 examinations (212 women, 112 men; mean age = 47 ± 12 years). The most frequently reported item was the supraspinatus tendon (83 %), the least frequently reported was the posterior recess (3 %). The image that was most frequently found was the long head of the biceps tendon (77 %), the least frequently found was the coraco-acromial ligament (3 %). The median number of images/examination was 6 (25th-75th percentiles, range 4-9). The mean number of unrecognizable images was 3 (2-4). A radiologist performed the examination in 269 patients (83 %). The rate of complete examinations was 47 %. The number of complete examinations performed by physicians from different specialties was not significantly different from that of incomplete examinations (P = 0.228).

CONCLUSIONS: Complete shoulder ultrasound examinations account for less than 50 % of those performed in clinical practice in some Italian regions. Standardized scanning protocols and structured reporting may help to improve this figure and consistency among providers performing these examinations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1629-1634
Number of pages6
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume45
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Italy
Rotator Cuff
Physicians
Ligaments
Tendons
Acromioclavicular Joint
Guidelines
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Cite this

How is shoulder ultrasound done in Italy? A survey of clinical practice. / Zappia, Marcello; Aliprandi, Alberto; Pozza, Simona; Doniselli, Fabio Martino; Gitto, Salvatore; Sconfienza, Luca Maria.

In: Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 45, No. 12, 12.2016, p. 1629-1634.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zappia, M, Aliprandi, A, Pozza, S, Doniselli, FM, Gitto, S & Sconfienza, LM 2016, 'How is shoulder ultrasound done in Italy? A survey of clinical practice', Skeletal Radiology, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1629-1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2477-5
Zappia, Marcello ; Aliprandi, Alberto ; Pozza, Simona ; Doniselli, Fabio Martino ; Gitto, Salvatore ; Sconfienza, Luca Maria. / How is shoulder ultrasound done in Italy? A survey of clinical practice. In: Skeletal Radiology. 2016 ; Vol. 45, No. 12. pp. 1629-1634.
@article{b4ba0d1c495a44c1808053fc45f9ca6f,
title = "How is shoulder ultrasound done in Italy?: A survey of clinical practice",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To define when an ultrasound examination of the shoulder can be considered complete and how many examinations currently performed in Italy are actually complete according to that definition.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports and images of previously performed ultrasound examinations of the shoulder of patients seen in 2014 for interventional procedures were reviewed for the following items, according to guidelines published by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology: long biceps, subscapularis, supraspinatus, external rotators, acromioclavicular joint, subacromial bursa, subacromial space, coraco-acromial ligament, and the posterior recess. The first six items were considered mandatory in a complete shoulder ultrasound examination. The specialization of the performing physician was noted. The number of complete examinations performed by different physicians was compared with the number of incomplete examinations.RESULTS: We analyzed 324 examinations (212 women, 112 men; mean age = 47 ± 12 years). The most frequently reported item was the supraspinatus tendon (83 {\%}), the least frequently reported was the posterior recess (3 {\%}). The image that was most frequently found was the long head of the biceps tendon (77 {\%}), the least frequently found was the coraco-acromial ligament (3 {\%}). The median number of images/examination was 6 (25th-75th percentiles, range 4-9). The mean number of unrecognizable images was 3 (2-4). A radiologist performed the examination in 269 patients (83 {\%}). The rate of complete examinations was 47 {\%}. The number of complete examinations performed by physicians from different specialties was not significantly different from that of incomplete examinations (P = 0.228).CONCLUSIONS: Complete shoulder ultrasound examinations account for less than 50 {\%} of those performed in clinical practice in some Italian regions. Standardized scanning protocols and structured reporting may help to improve this figure and consistency among providers performing these examinations.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Marcello Zappia and Alberto Aliprandi and Simona Pozza and Doniselli, {Fabio Martino} and Salvatore Gitto and Sconfienza, {Luca Maria}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00256-016-2477-5",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1629--1634",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How is shoulder ultrasound done in Italy?

T2 - A survey of clinical practice

AU - Zappia, Marcello

AU - Aliprandi, Alberto

AU - Pozza, Simona

AU - Doniselli, Fabio Martino

AU - Gitto, Salvatore

AU - Sconfienza, Luca Maria

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To define when an ultrasound examination of the shoulder can be considered complete and how many examinations currently performed in Italy are actually complete according to that definition.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports and images of previously performed ultrasound examinations of the shoulder of patients seen in 2014 for interventional procedures were reviewed for the following items, according to guidelines published by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology: long biceps, subscapularis, supraspinatus, external rotators, acromioclavicular joint, subacromial bursa, subacromial space, coraco-acromial ligament, and the posterior recess. The first six items were considered mandatory in a complete shoulder ultrasound examination. The specialization of the performing physician was noted. The number of complete examinations performed by different physicians was compared with the number of incomplete examinations.RESULTS: We analyzed 324 examinations (212 women, 112 men; mean age = 47 ± 12 years). The most frequently reported item was the supraspinatus tendon (83 %), the least frequently reported was the posterior recess (3 %). The image that was most frequently found was the long head of the biceps tendon (77 %), the least frequently found was the coraco-acromial ligament (3 %). The median number of images/examination was 6 (25th-75th percentiles, range 4-9). The mean number of unrecognizable images was 3 (2-4). A radiologist performed the examination in 269 patients (83 %). The rate of complete examinations was 47 %. The number of complete examinations performed by physicians from different specialties was not significantly different from that of incomplete examinations (P = 0.228).CONCLUSIONS: Complete shoulder ultrasound examinations account for less than 50 % of those performed in clinical practice in some Italian regions. Standardized scanning protocols and structured reporting may help to improve this figure and consistency among providers performing these examinations.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To define when an ultrasound examination of the shoulder can be considered complete and how many examinations currently performed in Italy are actually complete according to that definition.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports and images of previously performed ultrasound examinations of the shoulder of patients seen in 2014 for interventional procedures were reviewed for the following items, according to guidelines published by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology: long biceps, subscapularis, supraspinatus, external rotators, acromioclavicular joint, subacromial bursa, subacromial space, coraco-acromial ligament, and the posterior recess. The first six items were considered mandatory in a complete shoulder ultrasound examination. The specialization of the performing physician was noted. The number of complete examinations performed by different physicians was compared with the number of incomplete examinations.RESULTS: We analyzed 324 examinations (212 women, 112 men; mean age = 47 ± 12 years). The most frequently reported item was the supraspinatus tendon (83 %), the least frequently reported was the posterior recess (3 %). The image that was most frequently found was the long head of the biceps tendon (77 %), the least frequently found was the coraco-acromial ligament (3 %). The median number of images/examination was 6 (25th-75th percentiles, range 4-9). The mean number of unrecognizable images was 3 (2-4). A radiologist performed the examination in 269 patients (83 %). The rate of complete examinations was 47 %. The number of complete examinations performed by physicians from different specialties was not significantly different from that of incomplete examinations (P = 0.228).CONCLUSIONS: Complete shoulder ultrasound examinations account for less than 50 % of those performed in clinical practice in some Italian regions. Standardized scanning protocols and structured reporting may help to improve this figure and consistency among providers performing these examinations.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1007/s00256-016-2477-5

DO - 10.1007/s00256-016-2477-5

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 1629

EP - 1634

JO - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 12

ER -