How to differentiate hemianesthesia from left tactile neglect

A preliminary case report

Marco Pitteri, Annalena Venneri, Francesca Meneghello, Konstantinos Priftis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When assessing for the presence of hemianesthesia, the examiner touches the body of the patients, and requests that they report verbally the location of the delivered tactile stimulus. Contralesional omissions of single tactile stimuli, however, might be due to either primary somatosensory deficits or to spatial attention impairment (i.e., neglect). In this preliminary study, we tested whether clinical assessment can be improved to differentiate between these two types of deficit by modifying the assessment procedure. K.L., a patient with left unilateral neglect, was asked to detect tactile stimuli delivered in two conditions: spatial attention distributed either to his left or to his right hand, and spatial attention focused only on his left hand. Note that K.L. did not receive double simultaneous tactile stimuli. In the distributed spatial attention condition, K.L. omitted most of the single tactile stimuli delivered to his left hand. In the focused attention condition, K.L. was asked to focus his spatial attention only on his left hand. Under this latter condition, his performance increased dramatically, suggesting that his omissions were not due to hemianesthesia, but rather reflected left tactile neglect. In line with the neuropsychological findings, voxel based analysis of his grey and white matter damage confirmed significant loss in areas associated with left-sided neglect, but sparing of the primary somatosensory cortex. This result suggests that standard somatosensory assessment and differential diagnosis between hemianesthesia and tactile neglect may be more accurate when neuropsychology-based procedures are incorporated in the standard neurological examination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-155
Number of pages5
JournalBehavioural Neurology
Volume26
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Touch
Hand
Neuropsychology
Somatosensory Cortex
Neurologic Examination
Differential Diagnosis

Keywords

  • hemianesthesia
  • lesion mapping
  • neurological examination
  • spatial attention
  • Tactile neglect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

How to differentiate hemianesthesia from left tactile neglect : A preliminary case report. / Pitteri, Marco; Venneri, Annalena; Meneghello, Francesca; Priftis, Konstantinos.

In: Behavioural Neurology, Vol. 26, No. 1-2, 2013, p. 151-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pitteri, Marco ; Venneri, Annalena ; Meneghello, Francesca ; Priftis, Konstantinos. / How to differentiate hemianesthesia from left tactile neglect : A preliminary case report. In: Behavioural Neurology. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 1-2. pp. 151-155.
@article{651b20db9f1a4424bdf081c2edc8695d,
title = "How to differentiate hemianesthesia from left tactile neglect: A preliminary case report",
abstract = "When assessing for the presence of hemianesthesia, the examiner touches the body of the patients, and requests that they report verbally the location of the delivered tactile stimulus. Contralesional omissions of single tactile stimuli, however, might be due to either primary somatosensory deficits or to spatial attention impairment (i.e., neglect). In this preliminary study, we tested whether clinical assessment can be improved to differentiate between these two types of deficit by modifying the assessment procedure. K.L., a patient with left unilateral neglect, was asked to detect tactile stimuli delivered in two conditions: spatial attention distributed either to his left or to his right hand, and spatial attention focused only on his left hand. Note that K.L. did not receive double simultaneous tactile stimuli. In the distributed spatial attention condition, K.L. omitted most of the single tactile stimuli delivered to his left hand. In the focused attention condition, K.L. was asked to focus his spatial attention only on his left hand. Under this latter condition, his performance increased dramatically, suggesting that his omissions were not due to hemianesthesia, but rather reflected left tactile neglect. In line with the neuropsychological findings, voxel based analysis of his grey and white matter damage confirmed significant loss in areas associated with left-sided neglect, but sparing of the primary somatosensory cortex. This result suggests that standard somatosensory assessment and differential diagnosis between hemianesthesia and tactile neglect may be more accurate when neuropsychology-based procedures are incorporated in the standard neurological examination.",
keywords = "hemianesthesia, lesion mapping, neurological examination, spatial attention, Tactile neglect",
author = "Marco Pitteri and Annalena Venneri and Francesca Meneghello and Konstantinos Priftis",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.3233/BEN-2012-110225",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "151--155",
journal = "Behavioural Neurology",
issn = "0953-4180",
publisher = "HINDAWI LTD",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to differentiate hemianesthesia from left tactile neglect

T2 - A preliminary case report

AU - Pitteri, Marco

AU - Venneri, Annalena

AU - Meneghello, Francesca

AU - Priftis, Konstantinos

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - When assessing for the presence of hemianesthesia, the examiner touches the body of the patients, and requests that they report verbally the location of the delivered tactile stimulus. Contralesional omissions of single tactile stimuli, however, might be due to either primary somatosensory deficits or to spatial attention impairment (i.e., neglect). In this preliminary study, we tested whether clinical assessment can be improved to differentiate between these two types of deficit by modifying the assessment procedure. K.L., a patient with left unilateral neglect, was asked to detect tactile stimuli delivered in two conditions: spatial attention distributed either to his left or to his right hand, and spatial attention focused only on his left hand. Note that K.L. did not receive double simultaneous tactile stimuli. In the distributed spatial attention condition, K.L. omitted most of the single tactile stimuli delivered to his left hand. In the focused attention condition, K.L. was asked to focus his spatial attention only on his left hand. Under this latter condition, his performance increased dramatically, suggesting that his omissions were not due to hemianesthesia, but rather reflected left tactile neglect. In line with the neuropsychological findings, voxel based analysis of his grey and white matter damage confirmed significant loss in areas associated with left-sided neglect, but sparing of the primary somatosensory cortex. This result suggests that standard somatosensory assessment and differential diagnosis between hemianesthesia and tactile neglect may be more accurate when neuropsychology-based procedures are incorporated in the standard neurological examination.

AB - When assessing for the presence of hemianesthesia, the examiner touches the body of the patients, and requests that they report verbally the location of the delivered tactile stimulus. Contralesional omissions of single tactile stimuli, however, might be due to either primary somatosensory deficits or to spatial attention impairment (i.e., neglect). In this preliminary study, we tested whether clinical assessment can be improved to differentiate between these two types of deficit by modifying the assessment procedure. K.L., a patient with left unilateral neglect, was asked to detect tactile stimuli delivered in two conditions: spatial attention distributed either to his left or to his right hand, and spatial attention focused only on his left hand. Note that K.L. did not receive double simultaneous tactile stimuli. In the distributed spatial attention condition, K.L. omitted most of the single tactile stimuli delivered to his left hand. In the focused attention condition, K.L. was asked to focus his spatial attention only on his left hand. Under this latter condition, his performance increased dramatically, suggesting that his omissions were not due to hemianesthesia, but rather reflected left tactile neglect. In line with the neuropsychological findings, voxel based analysis of his grey and white matter damage confirmed significant loss in areas associated with left-sided neglect, but sparing of the primary somatosensory cortex. This result suggests that standard somatosensory assessment and differential diagnosis between hemianesthesia and tactile neglect may be more accurate when neuropsychology-based procedures are incorporated in the standard neurological examination.

KW - hemianesthesia

KW - lesion mapping

KW - neurological examination

KW - spatial attention

KW - Tactile neglect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872469275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872469275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/BEN-2012-110225

DO - 10.3233/BEN-2012-110225

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 151

EP - 155

JO - Behavioural Neurology

JF - Behavioural Neurology

SN - 0953-4180

IS - 1-2

ER -