How to identify patients who are less likely to have metachronous neoplasms after a colon cancer: A predictive model

L. Frazzoni, R.M. Zagari, L. Ricciardiello, M. La Marca, V. Smania, F. Bazzoli, L. Fuccio, L. Laterza, F. Fabbian, A. Mussetto, G. Dal Piaz, C. Trovato, S. Paggi, F. Radaelli, S. Piccirelli, P. Cesaro, C. Spada, P. Marone, M. Scagliarini, F. TatangeloA. Repici, C. Hassan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background âPatients with prior colon cancer have increased risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasms; therefore, endoscopic surveillance is indicated. Current recommendations are not risk-stratified. We investigated predictive factors for colorectal neoplasms to build a model to spare colonoscopies for low-risk patients. Methods â This was a multicenter, retrospective study including patients who underwent surgery for colon cancer in 2001âŠ-âŠ2008 (derivation cohort) and 2009âŠ-âŠ2013 (validation cohort). A predictive model for neoplasm occurrence at second surveillance colonoscopy was developed and validated. Results â 421 and 203 patients were included in derivation and validation cohort, respectively. At second surveillance colonoscopy, 112 (26.6âŠ%) and 55 (27.1âŠ%) patients had metachronous neoplasms in derivation and validation groups; three cancers were detected in the latter. History of left-sided colon cancer (OR 1.64, 95âŠ%CI 1.02âŠ-âŠ2.64), ≥âŠ1 advanced adenoma at index colonoscopy (OR 1.90, 95âŠ%CI 1.05âŠ-âŠ3.43), and ≥âŠ1 adenoma at first surveillance colonoscopy (OR 2.06, 95âŠ%CI 1.29âŠ-âŠ3.27) were independently predictive of metachronous colorectal neoplasms at second surveillance colonoscopy. For patients without such risk factors, diagnostic accuracy parameters were: 89.3âŠ% (95âŠ%CI 82.0âŠ%-94.3âŠ%) and 78.2âŠ% (95âŠ%CI 65.0âŠ%-88.2âŠ%) sensitivity, and 28.5âŠ% (95âŠ%CI 23.5âŠ%-33.9âŠ%) and 33.8âŠ% (95âŠ%CI 26.2âŠ%-42.0âŠ%) specificity in derivation and validation group, respectively. No cancer would be missed. Conclusions â Patients with prior left-sided colon cancer or ≥âŠ1 advanced adenoma at index colonoscopy or ≥âŠ1 adenoma at first surveillance colonoscopy had a significantly higher risk of neoplasms at second surveillance colonoscopy; patients without such factors had much lower risk and could safely skip the second surveillance colonoscopy. A prospective, multicenter validation study is needed. © 2020 Royal Society of Chemistry. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-226
Number of pages7
JournalEndoscopy
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • adenoma
  • adult
  • Article
  • cancer diagnosis
  • cancer epidemiology
  • cancer recurrence
  • cancer risk
  • cancer staging
  • cohort analysis
  • colon carcinoma
  • colon tumor
  • colonoscopy
  • diagnostic accuracy
  • female
  • human
  • low risk patient
  • major clinical study
  • male
  • metachronous neoplasm
  • middle aged
  • multicenter study
  • patient identification
  • predictive value
  • priority journal
  • recurrent disease
  • retrospective study
  • risk factor
  • sensitivity and specificity
  • splenic flexure

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How to identify patients who are less likely to have metachronous neoplasms after a colon cancer: A predictive model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this