How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person's quality of life?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a study that developed a standardized method to measure the outcome of assistive technology solutions. Here the term “assistive technology solution” or “AT solution” is used to describe any intervention involving assistive technology products and environmental adaptations to address a person’s individual problems related to disability in daily life, education, work, leisure and social life. A literature review was carried out in order to identify validated outcome measures, applicable to any kind of AT solutions. Eight instruments were identified as able to capture the impact of AT solutions in real-life context; three of them (KWAZO, IPPA and QUEST) were chosen to measure the outcome of the intervention for 34 subjects. KWAZO investigated the user's perception about the quality of the AT service delivery process. IPPA assessed the perceived effectiveness of the AT solution provided. QUEST measured the individual’s satisfaction with each AT equipment provided. The findings are described in this article. This standardized method for outcome measurement proved to be applicable in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (formerly GOODTECHS), GOODTECHS 2018
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages238-242
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781450365819
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 28 2018
Event4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good, GOODTECHS 2018 - Bologna, Italy
Duration: Nov 28 2018Nov 30 2018

Conference

Conference4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good, GOODTECHS 2018
CountryItaly
CityBologna
Period11/28/1811/30/18

Fingerprint

Education

Keywords

  • Assistive technology
  • AT outcome assessment
  • Participation
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Software

Cite this

Salatino, C., Pigini, L., & Andrich, R. (2018). How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person's quality of life? In Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (formerly GOODTECHS), GOODTECHS 2018 (pp. 238-242). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284869.3284910

How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person's quality of life? / Salatino, Claudia; Pigini, Lucia; Andrich, Renzo.

Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (formerly GOODTECHS), GOODTECHS 2018. Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. p. 238-242.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Salatino, C, Pigini, L & Andrich, R 2018, How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person's quality of life? in Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (formerly GOODTECHS), GOODTECHS 2018. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 238-242, 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good, GOODTECHS 2018, Bologna, Italy, 11/28/18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284869.3284910
Salatino C, Pigini L, Andrich R. How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person's quality of life? In Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (formerly GOODTECHS), GOODTECHS 2018. Association for Computing Machinery. 2018. p. 238-242 https://doi.org/10.1145/3284869.3284910
Salatino, Claudia ; Pigini, Lucia ; Andrich, Renzo. / How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person's quality of life?. Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (formerly GOODTECHS), GOODTECHS 2018. Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. pp. 238-242
@inproceedings{306041a6fc25460cbeeaa8a942766732,
title = "How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person's quality of life?",
abstract = "This paper reports the findings of a study that developed a standardized method to measure the outcome of assistive technology solutions. Here the term “assistive technology solution” or “AT solution” is used to describe any intervention involving assistive technology products and environmental adaptations to address a person’s individual problems related to disability in daily life, education, work, leisure and social life. A literature review was carried out in order to identify validated outcome measures, applicable to any kind of AT solutions. Eight instruments were identified as able to capture the impact of AT solutions in real-life context; three of them (KWAZO, IPPA and QUEST) were chosen to measure the outcome of the intervention for 34 subjects. KWAZO investigated the user's perception about the quality of the AT service delivery process. IPPA assessed the perceived effectiveness of the AT solution provided. QUEST measured the individual’s satisfaction with each AT equipment provided. The findings are described in this article. This standardized method for outcome measurement proved to be applicable in clinical practice.",
keywords = "Assistive technology, AT outcome assessment, Participation, Quality of life",
author = "Claudia Salatino and Lucia Pigini and Renzo Andrich",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1145/3284869.3284910",
language = "English",
pages = "238--242",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (formerly GOODTECHS), GOODTECHS 2018",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person's quality of life?

AU - Salatino, Claudia

AU - Pigini, Lucia

AU - Andrich, Renzo

PY - 2018/11/28

Y1 - 2018/11/28

N2 - This paper reports the findings of a study that developed a standardized method to measure the outcome of assistive technology solutions. Here the term “assistive technology solution” or “AT solution” is used to describe any intervention involving assistive technology products and environmental adaptations to address a person’s individual problems related to disability in daily life, education, work, leisure and social life. A literature review was carried out in order to identify validated outcome measures, applicable to any kind of AT solutions. Eight instruments were identified as able to capture the impact of AT solutions in real-life context; three of them (KWAZO, IPPA and QUEST) were chosen to measure the outcome of the intervention for 34 subjects. KWAZO investigated the user's perception about the quality of the AT service delivery process. IPPA assessed the perceived effectiveness of the AT solution provided. QUEST measured the individual’s satisfaction with each AT equipment provided. The findings are described in this article. This standardized method for outcome measurement proved to be applicable in clinical practice.

AB - This paper reports the findings of a study that developed a standardized method to measure the outcome of assistive technology solutions. Here the term “assistive technology solution” or “AT solution” is used to describe any intervention involving assistive technology products and environmental adaptations to address a person’s individual problems related to disability in daily life, education, work, leisure and social life. A literature review was carried out in order to identify validated outcome measures, applicable to any kind of AT solutions. Eight instruments were identified as able to capture the impact of AT solutions in real-life context; three of them (KWAZO, IPPA and QUEST) were chosen to measure the outcome of the intervention for 34 subjects. KWAZO investigated the user's perception about the quality of the AT service delivery process. IPPA assessed the perceived effectiveness of the AT solution provided. QUEST measured the individual’s satisfaction with each AT equipment provided. The findings are described in this article. This standardized method for outcome measurement proved to be applicable in clinical practice.

KW - Assistive technology

KW - AT outcome assessment

KW - Participation

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061098847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061098847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3284869.3284910

DO - 10.1145/3284869.3284910

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85061098847

SP - 238

EP - 242

BT - Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (formerly GOODTECHS), GOODTECHS 2018

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

ER -