How Tool-Use Shapes Body Metric Representation: Evidence From Motor Training With and Without Robotic Assistance

Valentina Bruno, Ilaria Carpinella, Marco Rabuffetti, Lorenzo De Giuli, Corrado Sinigaglia, Francesca Garbarini, Maurizio Ferrarin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous evidence has shown that tool-use can reshape one’s own body schema, extending peripersonal space and modulating the representation of related body parts. Here, we investigated the role of tool action in shaping the body metric representation, by contrasting two different views. According to a first view, the shaping would rely on the mere execution of tool action, while the second view suggests that the shaping induced by tool action on body representation would primarily depend on the representation of the action goals to be accomplished. To this aim, we contrasted a condition in which participants voluntarily accomplish the movement by representing the program and goal of a tool action (i.e., active tool-use training) with a condition in which the tool-use training was produced without any prior goal representation (i.e., passive tool-use training by means of robotic assistance). If the body metric representation primarily depends on the coexistence between goal representation and bodily movements, we would expect an increase of the perceived forearm length in the post- with respect to the pre-training phase after the active training phase only. Healthy participants were asked to estimate the midpoint of their right forearm before and after 20 min of tool-use training. In the active condition, subjects performed “enfold-and-push” movements using a rake to prolong their arm. In the passive condition, subjects were asked to be completely relaxed while the movements were performed with robotic assistance. Results showed a significant increase in the perceived arm length in the post- with respect to the pre-training phase only in the active task. Interestingly, only in the post-training phase, a significant difference was found between active and passive conditions, with a higher perceived arm length in the former than in the latter. From a theoretical perspective, these findings suggest that tool-use may shape body metric representation only when action programs are motorically represented and not merely produced. From a clinical perspective, these results support the use of robots for the rehabilitation of brain-damaged hemiplegic patients, provided that robot assistance during the exercises is present only “as-needed” and that patients’ motor representation is actively involved.

Original languageEnglish
Article number299
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 12 2019

Fingerprint

Body Image
Robotics
Arm
Forearm
Human Body
Healthy Volunteers
Rehabilitation
Exercise
Brain

Keywords

  • body metric representation
  • coexistence between goal representation and bodily movements
  • passive movements
  • peripersonal space
  • robotic assistance
  • tool-use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

How Tool-Use Shapes Body Metric Representation : Evidence From Motor Training With and Without Robotic Assistance. / Bruno, Valentina; Carpinella, Ilaria; Rabuffetti, Marco; De Giuli, Lorenzo; Sinigaglia, Corrado; Garbarini, Francesca; Ferrarin, Maurizio.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 13, 299, 12.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{673e3e6acc3b457d92674a808e5e0a8a,
title = "How Tool-Use Shapes Body Metric Representation: Evidence From Motor Training With and Without Robotic Assistance",
abstract = "Previous evidence has shown that tool-use can reshape one’s own body schema, extending peripersonal space and modulating the representation of related body parts. Here, we investigated the role of tool action in shaping the body metric representation, by contrasting two different views. According to a first view, the shaping would rely on the mere execution of tool action, while the second view suggests that the shaping induced by tool action on body representation would primarily depend on the representation of the action goals to be accomplished. To this aim, we contrasted a condition in which participants voluntarily accomplish the movement by representing the program and goal of a tool action (i.e., active tool-use training) with a condition in which the tool-use training was produced without any prior goal representation (i.e., passive tool-use training by means of robotic assistance). If the body metric representation primarily depends on the coexistence between goal representation and bodily movements, we would expect an increase of the perceived forearm length in the post- with respect to the pre-training phase after the active training phase only. Healthy participants were asked to estimate the midpoint of their right forearm before and after 20 min of tool-use training. In the active condition, subjects performed “enfold-and-push” movements using a rake to prolong their arm. In the passive condition, subjects were asked to be completely relaxed while the movements were performed with robotic assistance. Results showed a significant increase in the perceived arm length in the post- with respect to the pre-training phase only in the active task. Interestingly, only in the post-training phase, a significant difference was found between active and passive conditions, with a higher perceived arm length in the former than in the latter. From a theoretical perspective, these findings suggest that tool-use may shape body metric representation only when action programs are motorically represented and not merely produced. From a clinical perspective, these results support the use of robots for the rehabilitation of brain-damaged hemiplegic patients, provided that robot assistance during the exercises is present only “as-needed” and that patients’ motor representation is actively involved.",
keywords = "body metric representation, coexistence between goal representation and bodily movements, passive movements, peripersonal space, robotic assistance, tool-use",
author = "Valentina Bruno and Ilaria Carpinella and Marco Rabuffetti and {De Giuli}, Lorenzo and Corrado Sinigaglia and Francesca Garbarini and Maurizio Ferrarin",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "12",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2019.00299",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Tool-Use Shapes Body Metric Representation

T2 - Evidence From Motor Training With and Without Robotic Assistance

AU - Bruno, Valentina

AU - Carpinella, Ilaria

AU - Rabuffetti, Marco

AU - De Giuli, Lorenzo

AU - Sinigaglia, Corrado

AU - Garbarini, Francesca

AU - Ferrarin, Maurizio

PY - 2019/9/12

Y1 - 2019/9/12

N2 - Previous evidence has shown that tool-use can reshape one’s own body schema, extending peripersonal space and modulating the representation of related body parts. Here, we investigated the role of tool action in shaping the body metric representation, by contrasting two different views. According to a first view, the shaping would rely on the mere execution of tool action, while the second view suggests that the shaping induced by tool action on body representation would primarily depend on the representation of the action goals to be accomplished. To this aim, we contrasted a condition in which participants voluntarily accomplish the movement by representing the program and goal of a tool action (i.e., active tool-use training) with a condition in which the tool-use training was produced without any prior goal representation (i.e., passive tool-use training by means of robotic assistance). If the body metric representation primarily depends on the coexistence between goal representation and bodily movements, we would expect an increase of the perceived forearm length in the post- with respect to the pre-training phase after the active training phase only. Healthy participants were asked to estimate the midpoint of their right forearm before and after 20 min of tool-use training. In the active condition, subjects performed “enfold-and-push” movements using a rake to prolong their arm. In the passive condition, subjects were asked to be completely relaxed while the movements were performed with robotic assistance. Results showed a significant increase in the perceived arm length in the post- with respect to the pre-training phase only in the active task. Interestingly, only in the post-training phase, a significant difference was found between active and passive conditions, with a higher perceived arm length in the former than in the latter. From a theoretical perspective, these findings suggest that tool-use may shape body metric representation only when action programs are motorically represented and not merely produced. From a clinical perspective, these results support the use of robots for the rehabilitation of brain-damaged hemiplegic patients, provided that robot assistance during the exercises is present only “as-needed” and that patients’ motor representation is actively involved.

AB - Previous evidence has shown that tool-use can reshape one’s own body schema, extending peripersonal space and modulating the representation of related body parts. Here, we investigated the role of tool action in shaping the body metric representation, by contrasting two different views. According to a first view, the shaping would rely on the mere execution of tool action, while the second view suggests that the shaping induced by tool action on body representation would primarily depend on the representation of the action goals to be accomplished. To this aim, we contrasted a condition in which participants voluntarily accomplish the movement by representing the program and goal of a tool action (i.e., active tool-use training) with a condition in which the tool-use training was produced without any prior goal representation (i.e., passive tool-use training by means of robotic assistance). If the body metric representation primarily depends on the coexistence between goal representation and bodily movements, we would expect an increase of the perceived forearm length in the post- with respect to the pre-training phase after the active training phase only. Healthy participants were asked to estimate the midpoint of their right forearm before and after 20 min of tool-use training. In the active condition, subjects performed “enfold-and-push” movements using a rake to prolong their arm. In the passive condition, subjects were asked to be completely relaxed while the movements were performed with robotic assistance. Results showed a significant increase in the perceived arm length in the post- with respect to the pre-training phase only in the active task. Interestingly, only in the post-training phase, a significant difference was found between active and passive conditions, with a higher perceived arm length in the former than in the latter. From a theoretical perspective, these findings suggest that tool-use may shape body metric representation only when action programs are motorically represented and not merely produced. From a clinical perspective, these results support the use of robots for the rehabilitation of brain-damaged hemiplegic patients, provided that robot assistance during the exercises is present only “as-needed” and that patients’ motor representation is actively involved.

KW - body metric representation

KW - coexistence between goal representation and bodily movements

KW - passive movements

KW - peripersonal space

KW - robotic assistance

KW - tool-use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073002410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073002410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00299

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00299

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073002410

VL - 13

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

M1 - 299

ER -