La stenosi ipertrofica del piloro. Ultrasuoni e diagnostica tradizionale. Confronto di metodiche.

Translated title of the contribution: Hypertrophic stenosis of the pylorus. Ultrasound and traditional diagnosis. Comparison of methods

A. Chiara, G. Beluffi, P. Fiori, T. Dallocchio, R. Bragheri, G. Rondini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is the most frequent cause of abdominal surgery during the first months of life. A new diagnostic approach to this type of pathology is given by ultrasound examination which offers the opportunity to perform a precise study of pyloric muscle thickness, pyloric diameter width and pyloric muscle length. Ultrasound provides a quick diagnostic tool sparing radiation exposure to the patient. X-ray study is only to be reserved to the few cases in which clinical and ultrasound data are doubtful and--in all instances--to rule-out other possible causes of gastric outlet obstruction. We report 20 infants (14 males and 6 females) referred with clinical suspicion of HPS. This diagnosis has been confirmed by ultrasound in 12 cases, suspected in 1 and excluded in 7 cases. Upper gastrointestinal tract series confirmed the presence of HPS in 13 cases; discovered a huge gastroesophageal reflux in one and showed normal findings in 6 cases.

Translated title of the contributionHypertrophic stenosis of the pylorus. Ultrasound and traditional diagnosis. Comparison of methods
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)188-194
Number of pages7
JournalRadiologia Medica
Volume72
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1986

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hypertrophic stenosis of the pylorus. Ultrasound and traditional diagnosis. Comparison of methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Chiara, A., Beluffi, G., Fiori, P., Dallocchio, T., Bragheri, R., & Rondini, G. (1986). La stenosi ipertrofica del piloro. Ultrasuoni e diagnostica tradizionale. Confronto di metodiche. Radiologia Medica, 72(4), 188-194.