Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography

D. Regge, T. M. Gallo, G. Nieddu, G. Galatola, M. Fracchia, E. Neri, P. Vagli, C. Bartolozzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of our study was to describe the visualization, normal anatomy, and variations of the ileocecal valve with computed tomographic (CT) colonography to provide information about its optimal imaging. Methods: We analyzed data in two- and three-dimensional rendering mode in 71 consecutive patients who underwent routine CT colonoscopy followed by conventional colonoscopy for confirmation of the radiologic findings. Results: Complete visualization of the ileocecal valve was better achieved in the supine than in the prone position (82% vs. 62%, respectively); the ileocecal valve appeared in 64% of cases in the supine position when it was invisible in prone position (p <0.0001). Partial visualization of the ileocecal valve was possible in 94% of cases. The ileocecal valve was of labial type in 76%, papillary type in 21%, and lipomatous in 3% of cases. The orifice was identified in 53% of ileocecal valves; in two cases of cecal carcinoma, the normal ileocecal valve morphology was grossly disrupted. Conclusion: The ileocecal valve was at least partly visualized by CT colonoscopy in 94% of cases, more frequently in the supine position. Its most common normal morphology is the labial type. The absence of orifice visualization alone is not a specific sign for neoplasia, but its presence helps distinguish physiologic bulging from neoplasia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-25
Number of pages6
JournalAbdominal Imaging
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2005

Fingerprint

Ileocecal Valve
Computed Tomographic Colonography
Colonoscopy
Prone Position
Supine Position
Lip
Neoplasms
Anatomy
Carcinoma

Keywords

  • Cecal neoplasia
  • Computed tomographic colonography
  • Conventional colonoscopy
  • Ileocecal valve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Urology
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Regge, D., Gallo, T. M., Nieddu, G., Galatola, G., Fracchia, M., Neri, E., ... Bartolozzi, C. (2005). Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography. Abdominal Imaging, 30(1), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0225-0

Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography. / Regge, D.; Gallo, T. M.; Nieddu, G.; Galatola, G.; Fracchia, M.; Neri, E.; Vagli, P.; Bartolozzi, C.

In: Abdominal Imaging, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 20-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Regge, D, Gallo, TM, Nieddu, G, Galatola, G, Fracchia, M, Neri, E, Vagli, P & Bartolozzi, C 2005, 'Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography', Abdominal Imaging, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0225-0
Regge, D. ; Gallo, T. M. ; Nieddu, G. ; Galatola, G. ; Fracchia, M. ; Neri, E. ; Vagli, P. ; Bartolozzi, C. / Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography. In: Abdominal Imaging. 2005 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 20-25.
@article{03e4d9e692ed49129e8424e411b03524,
title = "Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography",
abstract = "Background: The aim of our study was to describe the visualization, normal anatomy, and variations of the ileocecal valve with computed tomographic (CT) colonography to provide information about its optimal imaging. Methods: We analyzed data in two- and three-dimensional rendering mode in 71 consecutive patients who underwent routine CT colonoscopy followed by conventional colonoscopy for confirmation of the radiologic findings. Results: Complete visualization of the ileocecal valve was better achieved in the supine than in the prone position (82{\%} vs. 62{\%}, respectively); the ileocecal valve appeared in 64{\%} of cases in the supine position when it was invisible in prone position (p <0.0001). Partial visualization of the ileocecal valve was possible in 94{\%} of cases. The ileocecal valve was of labial type in 76{\%}, papillary type in 21{\%}, and lipomatous in 3{\%} of cases. The orifice was identified in 53{\%} of ileocecal valves; in two cases of cecal carcinoma, the normal ileocecal valve morphology was grossly disrupted. Conclusion: The ileocecal valve was at least partly visualized by CT colonoscopy in 94{\%} of cases, more frequently in the supine position. Its most common normal morphology is the labial type. The absence of orifice visualization alone is not a specific sign for neoplasia, but its presence helps distinguish physiologic bulging from neoplasia.",
keywords = "Cecal neoplasia, Computed tomographic colonography, Conventional colonoscopy, Ileocecal valve",
author = "D. Regge and Gallo, {T. M.} and G. Nieddu and G. Galatola and M. Fracchia and E. Neri and P. Vagli and C. Bartolozzi",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00261-004-0225-0",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "20--25",
journal = "Abdominal Imaging",
issn = "0942-8925",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography

AU - Regge, D.

AU - Gallo, T. M.

AU - Nieddu, G.

AU - Galatola, G.

AU - Fracchia, M.

AU - Neri, E.

AU - Vagli, P.

AU - Bartolozzi, C.

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Background: The aim of our study was to describe the visualization, normal anatomy, and variations of the ileocecal valve with computed tomographic (CT) colonography to provide information about its optimal imaging. Methods: We analyzed data in two- and three-dimensional rendering mode in 71 consecutive patients who underwent routine CT colonoscopy followed by conventional colonoscopy for confirmation of the radiologic findings. Results: Complete visualization of the ileocecal valve was better achieved in the supine than in the prone position (82% vs. 62%, respectively); the ileocecal valve appeared in 64% of cases in the supine position when it was invisible in prone position (p <0.0001). Partial visualization of the ileocecal valve was possible in 94% of cases. The ileocecal valve was of labial type in 76%, papillary type in 21%, and lipomatous in 3% of cases. The orifice was identified in 53% of ileocecal valves; in two cases of cecal carcinoma, the normal ileocecal valve morphology was grossly disrupted. Conclusion: The ileocecal valve was at least partly visualized by CT colonoscopy in 94% of cases, more frequently in the supine position. Its most common normal morphology is the labial type. The absence of orifice visualization alone is not a specific sign for neoplasia, but its presence helps distinguish physiologic bulging from neoplasia.

AB - Background: The aim of our study was to describe the visualization, normal anatomy, and variations of the ileocecal valve with computed tomographic (CT) colonography to provide information about its optimal imaging. Methods: We analyzed data in two- and three-dimensional rendering mode in 71 consecutive patients who underwent routine CT colonoscopy followed by conventional colonoscopy for confirmation of the radiologic findings. Results: Complete visualization of the ileocecal valve was better achieved in the supine than in the prone position (82% vs. 62%, respectively); the ileocecal valve appeared in 64% of cases in the supine position when it was invisible in prone position (p <0.0001). Partial visualization of the ileocecal valve was possible in 94% of cases. The ileocecal valve was of labial type in 76%, papillary type in 21%, and lipomatous in 3% of cases. The orifice was identified in 53% of ileocecal valves; in two cases of cecal carcinoma, the normal ileocecal valve morphology was grossly disrupted. Conclusion: The ileocecal valve was at least partly visualized by CT colonoscopy in 94% of cases, more frequently in the supine position. Its most common normal morphology is the labial type. The absence of orifice visualization alone is not a specific sign for neoplasia, but its presence helps distinguish physiologic bulging from neoplasia.

KW - Cecal neoplasia

KW - Computed tomographic colonography

KW - Conventional colonoscopy

KW - Ileocecal valve

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12844277946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12844277946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-004-0225-0

DO - 10.1007/s00261-004-0225-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 15647867

AN - SCOPUS:12844277946

VL - 30

SP - 20

EP - 25

JO - Abdominal Imaging

JF - Abdominal Imaging

SN - 0942-8925

IS - 1

ER -