TY - JOUR
T1 - Image assessment with multislice CT coronary angiography.
AU - Cademartiri, Filippo
AU - Marano, Riccardo
AU - Luccichenti, Giacomo
AU - Mollet, Nico
AU - Runza, Giuseppe
AU - Galia, Massimo
AU - Belgrano, Manuel
AU - Gualerzi, Massimo
AU - Brambilla, Lorenzo
AU - Coruzzi, Paolo
AU - Midiri, Massimo
PY - 2005/3
Y1 - 2005/3
N2 - AIM: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of two different protocols for image evaluation used in multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing conventional coronary angiography (CA) were enrolled for MSCT-CA. All patients underwent 16-row MSCT (Sensation 16, Siemens, Germany) with the following parameters: detector rows 16, collimation 0.75 mm, gantry rotation time 375 ms. Two independent observers assessed the images for significant stenosis using a a protocol with standard projections and a three-dimensional protocol. The diagnostic accuracy for both methods was calculated using quantitative CA as a reference standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value obtained with the conventional projection protocol and with three-dimensional protocol were: 54% and 93%, 97% and 97%, 76% and 86%, 92% and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional projections in the assessment of MSCT-CA provide insufficient diagnostic accuracy compared with three-dimensional processing.
AB - AIM: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of two different protocols for image evaluation used in multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing conventional coronary angiography (CA) were enrolled for MSCT-CA. All patients underwent 16-row MSCT (Sensation 16, Siemens, Germany) with the following parameters: detector rows 16, collimation 0.75 mm, gantry rotation time 375 ms. Two independent observers assessed the images for significant stenosis using a a protocol with standard projections and a three-dimensional protocol. The diagnostic accuracy for both methods was calculated using quantitative CA as a reference standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value obtained with the conventional projection protocol and with three-dimensional protocol were: 54% and 93%, 97% and 97%, 76% and 86%, 92% and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional projections in the assessment of MSCT-CA provide insufficient diagnostic accuracy compared with three-dimensional processing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18244410182&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18244410182&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 15775888
AN - SCOPUS:18244410182
VL - 109
SP - 198
EP - 207
JO - Radiologia Medica
JF - Radiologia Medica
SN - 0033-8362
IS - 3
ER -