Imaging in the evaluation of endoscopic or surgical treatment for Achalasia

Diego Palladino, Andrea Mardighian, Marilina D'Amora, Luca Roberto, Francesco Lassandro, Claudia Rossi, Gianluca Gatta, Mariano Scaglione, Guglielmi Giuseppe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Purpose. Aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the endoscopic (pneumatic dilation) versus surgical (Heller myotomy) treatment in patients affected by esophageal achalasia using barium X-ray examination of the digestive tract performed before and after the treatment. Materials and Methods. 19 patients (10 males and 9 females) were enrolled in this study; each patient underwent a barium X-ray examination to evaluate the esophageal diameter and the height of the barium column before and after endoscopic or surgical treatment. Results. The mean variation of oesophageal diameter before and after treatment is -2.1 mm for surgery and 1.74 mm for pneumatic dilation (OR 0.167, CI 95% 0.02-1.419, and P: 0.10). The variations of all variables, with the exception of the oesophageal diameter variation, are strongly related to the treatment performed. Conclusions. The barium X-ray study of the digestive tract, performed before and after different treatment approaches, demonstrates that the surgical treatment has to be considered as the treatment of choice of achalasia, reserving endoscopic treatment to patients with high operative risk and refusing surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2657876
JournalGastroenterology Research and Practice
Publication statusPublished - 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology


Dive into the research topics of 'Imaging in the evaluation of endoscopic or surgical treatment for Achalasia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this