Imaging in the evaluation of endoscopic or surgical treatment for Achalasia

Diego Palladino, Andrea Mardighian, Marilina D'Amora, Luca Roberto, Francesco Lassandro, Claudia Rossi, Gianluca Gatta, Mariano Scaglione, Guglielmi Giuseppe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose. Aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the endoscopic (pneumatic dilation) versus surgical (Heller myotomy) treatment in patients affected by esophageal achalasia using barium X-ray examination of the digestive tract performed before and after the treatment. Materials and Methods. 19 patients (10 males and 9 females) were enrolled in this study; each patient underwent a barium X-ray examination to evaluate the esophageal diameter and the height of the barium column before and after endoscopic or surgical treatment. Results. The mean variation of oesophageal diameter before and after treatment is -2.1 mm for surgery and 1.74 mm for pneumatic dilation (OR 0.167, CI 95% 0.02-1.419, and P: 0.10). The variations of all variables, with the exception of the oesophageal diameter variation, are strongly related to the treatment performed. Conclusions. The barium X-ray study of the digestive tract, performed before and after different treatment approaches, demonstrates that the surgical treatment has to be considered as the treatment of choice of achalasia, reserving endoscopic treatment to patients with high operative risk and refusing surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2657876
JournalGastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Esophageal Achalasia
Barium
Therapeutics
X-Rays
Gastrointestinal Tract
Dilatation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology

Cite this

Imaging in the evaluation of endoscopic or surgical treatment for Achalasia. / Palladino, Diego; Mardighian, Andrea; D'Amora, Marilina; Roberto, Luca; Lassandro, Francesco; Rossi, Claudia; Gatta, Gianluca; Scaglione, Mariano; Giuseppe, Guglielmi.

In: Gastroenterology Research and Practice, Vol. 2016, 2657876, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Palladino, D, Mardighian, A, D'Amora, M, Roberto, L, Lassandro, F, Rossi, C, Gatta, G, Scaglione, M & Giuseppe, G 2016, 'Imaging in the evaluation of endoscopic or surgical treatment for Achalasia', Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2016, 2657876. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2657876
Palladino D, Mardighian A, D'Amora M, Roberto L, Lassandro F, Rossi C et al. Imaging in the evaluation of endoscopic or surgical treatment for Achalasia. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2016;2016. 2657876. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2657876
Palladino, Diego ; Mardighian, Andrea ; D'Amora, Marilina ; Roberto, Luca ; Lassandro, Francesco ; Rossi, Claudia ; Gatta, Gianluca ; Scaglione, Mariano ; Giuseppe, Guglielmi. / Imaging in the evaluation of endoscopic or surgical treatment for Achalasia. In: Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2016 ; Vol. 2016.
@article{e115fa7dcfcf4f7f933b320e32767cec,
title = "Imaging in the evaluation of endoscopic or surgical treatment for Achalasia",
abstract = "Purpose. Aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the endoscopic (pneumatic dilation) versus surgical (Heller myotomy) treatment in patients affected by esophageal achalasia using barium X-ray examination of the digestive tract performed before and after the treatment. Materials and Methods. 19 patients (10 males and 9 females) were enrolled in this study; each patient underwent a barium X-ray examination to evaluate the esophageal diameter and the height of the barium column before and after endoscopic or surgical treatment. Results. The mean variation of oesophageal diameter before and after treatment is -2.1 mm for surgery and 1.74 mm for pneumatic dilation (OR 0.167, CI 95{\%} 0.02-1.419, and P: 0.10). The variations of all variables, with the exception of the oesophageal diameter variation, are strongly related to the treatment performed. Conclusions. The barium X-ray study of the digestive tract, performed before and after different treatment approaches, demonstrates that the surgical treatment has to be considered as the treatment of choice of achalasia, reserving endoscopic treatment to patients with high operative risk and refusing surgery.",
author = "Diego Palladino and Andrea Mardighian and Marilina D'Amora and Luca Roberto and Francesco Lassandro and Claudia Rossi and Gianluca Gatta and Mariano Scaglione and Guglielmi Giuseppe",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1155/2016/2657876",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
journal = "Gastroenterology Research and Practice",
issn = "1687-6121",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging in the evaluation of endoscopic or surgical treatment for Achalasia

AU - Palladino, Diego

AU - Mardighian, Andrea

AU - D'Amora, Marilina

AU - Roberto, Luca

AU - Lassandro, Francesco

AU - Rossi, Claudia

AU - Gatta, Gianluca

AU - Scaglione, Mariano

AU - Giuseppe, Guglielmi

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose. Aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the endoscopic (pneumatic dilation) versus surgical (Heller myotomy) treatment in patients affected by esophageal achalasia using barium X-ray examination of the digestive tract performed before and after the treatment. Materials and Methods. 19 patients (10 males and 9 females) were enrolled in this study; each patient underwent a barium X-ray examination to evaluate the esophageal diameter and the height of the barium column before and after endoscopic or surgical treatment. Results. The mean variation of oesophageal diameter before and after treatment is -2.1 mm for surgery and 1.74 mm for pneumatic dilation (OR 0.167, CI 95% 0.02-1.419, and P: 0.10). The variations of all variables, with the exception of the oesophageal diameter variation, are strongly related to the treatment performed. Conclusions. The barium X-ray study of the digestive tract, performed before and after different treatment approaches, demonstrates that the surgical treatment has to be considered as the treatment of choice of achalasia, reserving endoscopic treatment to patients with high operative risk and refusing surgery.

AB - Purpose. Aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the endoscopic (pneumatic dilation) versus surgical (Heller myotomy) treatment in patients affected by esophageal achalasia using barium X-ray examination of the digestive tract performed before and after the treatment. Materials and Methods. 19 patients (10 males and 9 females) were enrolled in this study; each patient underwent a barium X-ray examination to evaluate the esophageal diameter and the height of the barium column before and after endoscopic or surgical treatment. Results. The mean variation of oesophageal diameter before and after treatment is -2.1 mm for surgery and 1.74 mm for pneumatic dilation (OR 0.167, CI 95% 0.02-1.419, and P: 0.10). The variations of all variables, with the exception of the oesophageal diameter variation, are strongly related to the treatment performed. Conclusions. The barium X-ray study of the digestive tract, performed before and after different treatment approaches, demonstrates that the surgical treatment has to be considered as the treatment of choice of achalasia, reserving endoscopic treatment to patients with high operative risk and refusing surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956910653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956910653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2016/2657876

DO - 10.1155/2016/2657876

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84956910653

VL - 2016

JO - Gastroenterology Research and Practice

JF - Gastroenterology Research and Practice

SN - 1687-6121

M1 - 2657876

ER -