Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Postextraction Implants: A Long-Term Retrospective Cohort Study

Tiziano Testori, Silvio Taschieri, Fabio Scutellà, Massimo Del Fabbro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE:: To compare the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes between immediate loading (IL) and conventional loading of implants placed immediately in fresh extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Demographic data, implant details, and periapical radiographs of patients were collected. The long-term marginal bone level remodeling and implant survival rate were calculated. RESULTS:: Twenty-one patients (mean age 52.55 ± 14.61 years) with 35 implants immediately inserted into postextraction sites (22 immediate loaded and 13 delayed loaded) were analyzed. The mean follow-up duration was 6 years (range 2–11 years). The implant cumulative survival rate was 96.5%. At the longest follow-up, the mean crestal bone level averaged 0.144 ± 0.705 for IL and 0.161 ± 0.877 for delayed loading, respectively. The mean implant aesthetic score was 7. CONCLUSIONS:: IL does not negatively influence the long-term prognosis of implants inserted into fresh extraction sockets.

Original languageEnglish
JournalImplant Dentistry
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jul 17 2017

Fingerprint

Cohort Studies
Survival Rate
Retrospective Studies
Bone Remodeling
Esthetics
Demography
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Postextraction Implants : A Long-Term Retrospective Cohort Study. / Testori, Tiziano; Taschieri, Silvio; Scutellà, Fabio; Del Fabbro, Massimo.

In: Implant Dentistry, 17.07.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{361971e07033467796ffaa16cc051c07,
title = "Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Postextraction Implants: A Long-Term Retrospective Cohort Study",
abstract = "PURPOSE:: To compare the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes between immediate loading (IL) and conventional loading of implants placed immediately in fresh extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Demographic data, implant details, and periapical radiographs of patients were collected. The long-term marginal bone level remodeling and implant survival rate were calculated. RESULTS:: Twenty-one patients (mean age 52.55 ± 14.61 years) with 35 implants immediately inserted into postextraction sites (22 immediate loaded and 13 delayed loaded) were analyzed. The mean follow-up duration was 6 years (range 2–11 years). The implant cumulative survival rate was 96.5{\%}. At the longest follow-up, the mean crestal bone level averaged 0.144 ± 0.705 for IL and 0.161 ± 0.877 for delayed loading, respectively. The mean implant aesthetic score was 7. CONCLUSIONS:: IL does not negatively influence the long-term prognosis of implants inserted into fresh extraction sockets.",
author = "Tiziano Testori and Silvio Taschieri and Fabio Scutell{\`a} and {Del Fabbro}, Massimo",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1097/ID.0000000000000635",
language = "English",
journal = "Implant Dentistry",
issn = "1056-6163",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Postextraction Implants

T2 - A Long-Term Retrospective Cohort Study

AU - Testori, Tiziano

AU - Taschieri, Silvio

AU - Scutellà, Fabio

AU - Del Fabbro, Massimo

PY - 2017/7/17

Y1 - 2017/7/17

N2 - PURPOSE:: To compare the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes between immediate loading (IL) and conventional loading of implants placed immediately in fresh extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Demographic data, implant details, and periapical radiographs of patients were collected. The long-term marginal bone level remodeling and implant survival rate were calculated. RESULTS:: Twenty-one patients (mean age 52.55 ± 14.61 years) with 35 implants immediately inserted into postextraction sites (22 immediate loaded and 13 delayed loaded) were analyzed. The mean follow-up duration was 6 years (range 2–11 years). The implant cumulative survival rate was 96.5%. At the longest follow-up, the mean crestal bone level averaged 0.144 ± 0.705 for IL and 0.161 ± 0.877 for delayed loading, respectively. The mean implant aesthetic score was 7. CONCLUSIONS:: IL does not negatively influence the long-term prognosis of implants inserted into fresh extraction sockets.

AB - PURPOSE:: To compare the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes between immediate loading (IL) and conventional loading of implants placed immediately in fresh extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Demographic data, implant details, and periapical radiographs of patients were collected. The long-term marginal bone level remodeling and implant survival rate were calculated. RESULTS:: Twenty-one patients (mean age 52.55 ± 14.61 years) with 35 implants immediately inserted into postextraction sites (22 immediate loaded and 13 delayed loaded) were analyzed. The mean follow-up duration was 6 years (range 2–11 years). The implant cumulative survival rate was 96.5%. At the longest follow-up, the mean crestal bone level averaged 0.144 ± 0.705 for IL and 0.161 ± 0.877 for delayed loading, respectively. The mean implant aesthetic score was 7. CONCLUSIONS:: IL does not negatively influence the long-term prognosis of implants inserted into fresh extraction sockets.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024504536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024504536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000635

DO - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000635

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024504536

JO - Implant Dentistry

JF - Implant Dentistry

SN - 1056-6163

ER -