Impact of ERAS approach and minimally-invasive techniques on outcome of patients undergoing liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Francesca Ratti; Federica Cipriani; Raffaella Reineke; Marco Catena; Laura Comotti; Luigi Beretta; Luca Aldrighetti

doi:10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.032

Impact of ERAS approach and minimally-invasive techniques on outcome of patients undergoing liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Francesca Ratti, Federica Cipriani, Raffaella Reineke, Marco Catena, Laura Comotti, Luigi Beretta, Luca Aldrighetti

IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background and aim: Aim of the study was to assess the impact of ERAS approach ("fluid restrictive and drainless") on open liver resections for HCC comparing their outcome with open resections in pre-ERAS period and with laparoscopic surgery. Study design: 207 patients undergoing minor liver resection for HCC were divided into three groups: Group A, open minor resections in pre-ERAS period (95 patients); Group B, laparoscopic ERAS resections (55 patients); Group C, open ERAS resections (57 patients). Results: Blood loss was lower in group C and B compared with group A. Postoperative morbidity was 26.5% in group A, 16.3% in group B and 12.1% in group C (p .

Original language	English
Journal	Digestive and Liver Disease
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.032
Publication status	Accepted/In press - May 19 2016

Keywords

ERAS
Fast track
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Laparoscopy
Liver failure
Liver surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)
Hepatology
Gastroenterology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.032

Cite this

@article{b564950386e44e71b137088920975ea1,

title = "Impact of ERAS approach and minimally-invasive techniques on outcome of patients undergoing liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma",

abstract = "Background and aim: Aim of the study was to assess the impact of ERAS approach ({"}fluid restrictive and drainless{"}) on open liver resections for HCC comparing their outcome with open resections in pre-ERAS period and with laparoscopic surgery. Study design: 207 patients undergoing minor liver resection for HCC were divided into three groups: Group A, open minor resections in pre-ERAS period (95 patients); Group B, laparoscopic ERAS resections (55 patients); Group C, open ERAS resections (57 patients). Results: Blood loss was lower in group C and B compared with group A. Postoperative morbidity was 26.5% in group A, 16.3% in group B and 12.1% in group C (p . ",

keywords = "ERAS, Fast track, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Laparoscopy, Liver failure, Liver surgery",

author = "Francesca Ratti and Federica Cipriani and Raffaella Reineke and Marco Catena and Laura Comotti and Luigi Beretta and Luca Aldrighetti",

year = "2016",

month = may,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.032",

language = "English",

journal = "Digestive and Liver Disease",

issn = "1590-8658",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of ERAS approach and minimally-invasive techniques on outcome of patients undergoing liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

AU - Ratti, Francesca

AU - Cipriani, Federica

AU - Reineke, Raffaella

AU - Catena, Marco

AU - Comotti, Laura

AU - Beretta, Luigi

AU - Aldrighetti, Luca

PY - 2016/5/19

Y1 - 2016/5/19

N2 - Background and aim: Aim of the study was to assess the impact of ERAS approach ("fluid restrictive and drainless") on open liver resections for HCC comparing their outcome with open resections in pre-ERAS period and with laparoscopic surgery. Study design: 207 patients undergoing minor liver resection for HCC were divided into three groups: Group A, open minor resections in pre-ERAS period (95 patients); Group B, laparoscopic ERAS resections (55 patients); Group C, open ERAS resections (57 patients). Results: Blood loss was lower in group C and B compared with group A. Postoperative morbidity was 26.5% in group A, 16.3% in group B and 12.1% in group C (p .

AB - Background and aim: Aim of the study was to assess the impact of ERAS approach ("fluid restrictive and drainless") on open liver resections for HCC comparing their outcome with open resections in pre-ERAS period and with laparoscopic surgery. Study design: 207 patients undergoing minor liver resection for HCC were divided into three groups: Group A, open minor resections in pre-ERAS period (95 patients); Group B, laparoscopic ERAS resections (55 patients); Group C, open ERAS resections (57 patients). Results: Blood loss was lower in group C and B compared with group A. Postoperative morbidity was 26.5% in group A, 16.3% in group B and 12.1% in group C (p .

KW - ERAS

KW - Fast track

KW - Hepatocellular carcinoma

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Liver failure

KW - Liver surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981744776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981744776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.032

DO - 10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.032

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84981744776

JO - Digestive and Liver Disease

JF - Digestive and Liver Disease

SN - 1590-8658

ER -

Impact of ERAS approach and minimally-invasive techniques on outcome of patients undergoing liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this