Impact of flow and temperature on patient comfort during respiratory support by high-flow nasal cannula

Tommaso Mauri, Alessandro Galazzi, Filippo Binda, Laura Masciopinto, Nadia Corcione, Eleonora Carlesso, Marta Lazzeri, Elena Spinelli, Daniela Tubiolo, Carlo Alberto Volta, Ileana Adamini, Antonio Pesenti, Giacomo Grasselli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) delivers up to 60 l/min of humidified air/oxygen blend at a temperature close to that of the human body. In this study, we tested whether higher temperature and flow decrease patient comfort. In more severe patients, instead, we hypothesized that higher flow might be associated with improved comfort. Methods: A prospective, randomized, cross-over study was performed on 40 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) patients (PaO2/FiO2≤300+pulmonary infiltrates + exclusion of cardiogenic edema) supported by HFNC. The primary outcome was the assessment of patient comfort during HFNC delivery at increasing flow and temperature. Two flows (30 and 60 l/min), each combined with two temperatures (31 and 37 °C), were randomly applied for 20 min (four steps per patient), leaving clinical FiO2 unchanged. Toward the end of each step, the following were recorded: comfort by Visual Numerical Scale ranging between 1 (extreme discomfort) and 5 (very comfortable), together with respiratory parameters. A subgroup of more severe patients was defined by clinical FiO2≥45%. Results: Patient comfort was reported as significantly higher during steps at the lower temperature (31 °C) in comparison to 37 °C, with the HFNC set at both 30 and 60 l/min (p<0.0001). Higher flow, however, was not associated with poorer comfort. In the subgroup of patients with clinical FiO2≥45%, both lower temperature (31 °C) and higher HFNC flow (60 l/min) led to higher comfort (p<0.01). Conclusions: HFNC temperature seems to significantly impact the comfort of AHRF patients: for equal flow, lower temperature could be more comfortable. Higher flow does not decrease patient comfort; at variance, it improves comfort in the more severely hypoxemic patient.

Original languageEnglish
Article number120
JournalCritical Care
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 9 2018

Fingerprint

Temperature
Respiratory Insufficiency
Cannula
Patient Comfort
Human Body
Cross-Over Studies
Edema
Air
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Oxygen
Lung

Keywords

  • Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
  • High-flow nasal oxygen
  • Nursing
  • Patient comfort
  • Spontaneous breathing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Impact of flow and temperature on patient comfort during respiratory support by high-flow nasal cannula. / Mauri, Tommaso; Galazzi, Alessandro; Binda, Filippo; Masciopinto, Laura; Corcione, Nadia; Carlesso, Eleonora; Lazzeri, Marta; Spinelli, Elena; Tubiolo, Daniela; Volta, Carlo Alberto; Adamini, Ileana; Pesenti, Antonio; Grasselli, Giacomo.

In: Critical Care, Vol. 22, No. 1, 120, 09.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mauri, Tommaso ; Galazzi, Alessandro ; Binda, Filippo ; Masciopinto, Laura ; Corcione, Nadia ; Carlesso, Eleonora ; Lazzeri, Marta ; Spinelli, Elena ; Tubiolo, Daniela ; Volta, Carlo Alberto ; Adamini, Ileana ; Pesenti, Antonio ; Grasselli, Giacomo. / Impact of flow and temperature on patient comfort during respiratory support by high-flow nasal cannula. In: Critical Care. 2018 ; Vol. 22, No. 1.
@article{2d728d2d7e5641418d5d12403d5ab039,
title = "Impact of flow and temperature on patient comfort during respiratory support by high-flow nasal cannula",
abstract = "Background: The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) delivers up to 60 l/min of humidified air/oxygen blend at a temperature close to that of the human body. In this study, we tested whether higher temperature and flow decrease patient comfort. In more severe patients, instead, we hypothesized that higher flow might be associated with improved comfort. Methods: A prospective, randomized, cross-over study was performed on 40 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) patients (PaO2/FiO2≤300+pulmonary infiltrates + exclusion of cardiogenic edema) supported by HFNC. The primary outcome was the assessment of patient comfort during HFNC delivery at increasing flow and temperature. Two flows (30 and 60 l/min), each combined with two temperatures (31 and 37 °C), were randomly applied for 20 min (four steps per patient), leaving clinical FiO2 unchanged. Toward the end of each step, the following were recorded: comfort by Visual Numerical Scale ranging between 1 (extreme discomfort) and 5 (very comfortable), together with respiratory parameters. A subgroup of more severe patients was defined by clinical FiO2≥45{\%}. Results: Patient comfort was reported as significantly higher during steps at the lower temperature (31 °C) in comparison to 37 °C, with the HFNC set at both 30 and 60 l/min (p<0.0001). Higher flow, however, was not associated with poorer comfort. In the subgroup of patients with clinical FiO2≥45{\%}, both lower temperature (31 °C) and higher HFNC flow (60 l/min) led to higher comfort (p<0.01). Conclusions: HFNC temperature seems to significantly impact the comfort of AHRF patients: for equal flow, lower temperature could be more comfortable. Higher flow does not decrease patient comfort; at variance, it improves comfort in the more severely hypoxemic patient.",
keywords = "Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, High-flow nasal oxygen, Nursing, Patient comfort, Spontaneous breathing",
author = "Tommaso Mauri and Alessandro Galazzi and Filippo Binda and Laura Masciopinto and Nadia Corcione and Eleonora Carlesso and Marta Lazzeri and Elena Spinelli and Daniela Tubiolo and Volta, {Carlo Alberto} and Ileana Adamini and Antonio Pesenti and Giacomo Grasselli",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1186/s13054-018-2039-4",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Critical Care",
issn = "1466-609X",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of flow and temperature on patient comfort during respiratory support by high-flow nasal cannula

AU - Mauri, Tommaso

AU - Galazzi, Alessandro

AU - Binda, Filippo

AU - Masciopinto, Laura

AU - Corcione, Nadia

AU - Carlesso, Eleonora

AU - Lazzeri, Marta

AU - Spinelli, Elena

AU - Tubiolo, Daniela

AU - Volta, Carlo Alberto

AU - Adamini, Ileana

AU - Pesenti, Antonio

AU - Grasselli, Giacomo

PY - 2018/5/9

Y1 - 2018/5/9

N2 - Background: The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) delivers up to 60 l/min of humidified air/oxygen blend at a temperature close to that of the human body. In this study, we tested whether higher temperature and flow decrease patient comfort. In more severe patients, instead, we hypothesized that higher flow might be associated with improved comfort. Methods: A prospective, randomized, cross-over study was performed on 40 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) patients (PaO2/FiO2≤300+pulmonary infiltrates + exclusion of cardiogenic edema) supported by HFNC. The primary outcome was the assessment of patient comfort during HFNC delivery at increasing flow and temperature. Two flows (30 and 60 l/min), each combined with two temperatures (31 and 37 °C), were randomly applied for 20 min (four steps per patient), leaving clinical FiO2 unchanged. Toward the end of each step, the following were recorded: comfort by Visual Numerical Scale ranging between 1 (extreme discomfort) and 5 (very comfortable), together with respiratory parameters. A subgroup of more severe patients was defined by clinical FiO2≥45%. Results: Patient comfort was reported as significantly higher during steps at the lower temperature (31 °C) in comparison to 37 °C, with the HFNC set at both 30 and 60 l/min (p<0.0001). Higher flow, however, was not associated with poorer comfort. In the subgroup of patients with clinical FiO2≥45%, both lower temperature (31 °C) and higher HFNC flow (60 l/min) led to higher comfort (p<0.01). Conclusions: HFNC temperature seems to significantly impact the comfort of AHRF patients: for equal flow, lower temperature could be more comfortable. Higher flow does not decrease patient comfort; at variance, it improves comfort in the more severely hypoxemic patient.

AB - Background: The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) delivers up to 60 l/min of humidified air/oxygen blend at a temperature close to that of the human body. In this study, we tested whether higher temperature and flow decrease patient comfort. In more severe patients, instead, we hypothesized that higher flow might be associated with improved comfort. Methods: A prospective, randomized, cross-over study was performed on 40 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) patients (PaO2/FiO2≤300+pulmonary infiltrates + exclusion of cardiogenic edema) supported by HFNC. The primary outcome was the assessment of patient comfort during HFNC delivery at increasing flow and temperature. Two flows (30 and 60 l/min), each combined with two temperatures (31 and 37 °C), were randomly applied for 20 min (four steps per patient), leaving clinical FiO2 unchanged. Toward the end of each step, the following were recorded: comfort by Visual Numerical Scale ranging between 1 (extreme discomfort) and 5 (very comfortable), together with respiratory parameters. A subgroup of more severe patients was defined by clinical FiO2≥45%. Results: Patient comfort was reported as significantly higher during steps at the lower temperature (31 °C) in comparison to 37 °C, with the HFNC set at both 30 and 60 l/min (p<0.0001). Higher flow, however, was not associated with poorer comfort. In the subgroup of patients with clinical FiO2≥45%, both lower temperature (31 °C) and higher HFNC flow (60 l/min) led to higher comfort (p<0.01). Conclusions: HFNC temperature seems to significantly impact the comfort of AHRF patients: for equal flow, lower temperature could be more comfortable. Higher flow does not decrease patient comfort; at variance, it improves comfort in the more severely hypoxemic patient.

KW - Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

KW - High-flow nasal oxygen

KW - Nursing

KW - Patient comfort

KW - Spontaneous breathing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046641176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046641176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13054-018-2039-4

DO - 10.1186/s13054-018-2039-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046641176

VL - 22

JO - Critical Care

JF - Critical Care

SN - 1466-609X

IS - 1

M1 - 120

ER -