Impact of new technologies on the clinical and functional outcome of Altemeier's procedure

A randomized, controlled trial

Paolo Boccasanta, Marco Venturi, Sergio Barbieri, Giancarlo Roviaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: A randomized study was performed to assess whether new technologies offer advantages over the conventional technique on the clinical and functional outcome of patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence, submitted to Altemeier's procedure with levatorplasty. METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2003, 58 patients (55 females; mean age, 70.9 ± 11.3 years) with full-thickness rectal prolapse were evaluated with continence score, colonoscopy, anorectal manometry, anal electromyography, and sacral reflex latency; 40 of them were selected and randomly assigned to two groups: 20 patients (Group 1; 19 females, 73.4 ± 10.4 years) were submitted to a conventional operation with monopolar electrocautery and handsewn anastomosis, and 20 (Group 2; 18 females, 71.5 ± 12.2 years) using harmonic scalpel and circular stapler. Patients were followed up with clinical examination, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography, with mean follow-up 29.3 ± 8.5 and 27.5 ± 9.2 months in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. RESULTS: Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly reduced in Group 2 (P <0.001), whereas no differences were found in pain score, time to return to normal activity, morbidity, and mortality. Complications were two (10 percent) stenosis in Group 1. Fecal continence score significantly improved in both groups (P <0.01), whereas anorectal manometry and neurophysiologic data were not significantly modified by the operation. Recurrence rates were 15 and 10 percent in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P= not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and functional long-term results of perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty are not influenced by surgical instruments and type of coloanal anastomosis. The clinical relevance of the short-term results in high-risk patients should be specifically investigated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)652-660
Number of pages9
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Technology
Manometry
Rectal Prolapse
Electromyography
Fecal Incontinence
Electrocoagulation
Colonoscopy
Operative Time
Surgical Instruments
Reflex
Length of Stay
Pathologic Constriction
Morbidity
Recurrence
Pain
Mortality

Keywords

  • Full-thickness rectal prolapse
  • Perineal rectosigmoidectomy
  • Stapled coloanal anastomosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Impact of new technologies on the clinical and functional outcome of Altemeier's procedure : A randomized, controlled trial. / Boccasanta, Paolo; Venturi, Marco; Barbieri, Sergio; Roviaro, Giancarlo.

In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, Vol. 49, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 652-660.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e3c6bb13db04d8bb0d53660dff6b526,
title = "Impact of new technologies on the clinical and functional outcome of Altemeier's procedure: A randomized, controlled trial",
abstract = "PURPOSE: A randomized study was performed to assess whether new technologies offer advantages over the conventional technique on the clinical and functional outcome of patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence, submitted to Altemeier's procedure with levatorplasty. METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2003, 58 patients (55 females; mean age, 70.9 ± 11.3 years) with full-thickness rectal prolapse were evaluated with continence score, colonoscopy, anorectal manometry, anal electromyography, and sacral reflex latency; 40 of them were selected and randomly assigned to two groups: 20 patients (Group 1; 19 females, 73.4 ± 10.4 years) were submitted to a conventional operation with monopolar electrocautery and handsewn anastomosis, and 20 (Group 2; 18 females, 71.5 ± 12.2 years) using harmonic scalpel and circular stapler. Patients were followed up with clinical examination, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography, with mean follow-up 29.3 ± 8.5 and 27.5 ± 9.2 months in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. RESULTS: Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly reduced in Group 2 (P <0.001), whereas no differences were found in pain score, time to return to normal activity, morbidity, and mortality. Complications were two (10 percent) stenosis in Group 1. Fecal continence score significantly improved in both groups (P <0.01), whereas anorectal manometry and neurophysiologic data were not significantly modified by the operation. Recurrence rates were 15 and 10 percent in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P= not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and functional long-term results of perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty are not influenced by surgical instruments and type of coloanal anastomosis. The clinical relevance of the short-term results in high-risk patients should be specifically investigated.",
keywords = "Full-thickness rectal prolapse, Perineal rectosigmoidectomy, Stapled coloanal anastomosis",
author = "Paolo Boccasanta and Marco Venturi and Sergio Barbieri and Giancarlo Roviaro",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s10350-006-0505-6",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "652--660",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon and Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of new technologies on the clinical and functional outcome of Altemeier's procedure

T2 - A randomized, controlled trial

AU - Boccasanta, Paolo

AU - Venturi, Marco

AU - Barbieri, Sergio

AU - Roviaro, Giancarlo

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - PURPOSE: A randomized study was performed to assess whether new technologies offer advantages over the conventional technique on the clinical and functional outcome of patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence, submitted to Altemeier's procedure with levatorplasty. METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2003, 58 patients (55 females; mean age, 70.9 ± 11.3 years) with full-thickness rectal prolapse were evaluated with continence score, colonoscopy, anorectal manometry, anal electromyography, and sacral reflex latency; 40 of them were selected and randomly assigned to two groups: 20 patients (Group 1; 19 females, 73.4 ± 10.4 years) were submitted to a conventional operation with monopolar electrocautery and handsewn anastomosis, and 20 (Group 2; 18 females, 71.5 ± 12.2 years) using harmonic scalpel and circular stapler. Patients were followed up with clinical examination, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography, with mean follow-up 29.3 ± 8.5 and 27.5 ± 9.2 months in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. RESULTS: Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly reduced in Group 2 (P <0.001), whereas no differences were found in pain score, time to return to normal activity, morbidity, and mortality. Complications were two (10 percent) stenosis in Group 1. Fecal continence score significantly improved in both groups (P <0.01), whereas anorectal manometry and neurophysiologic data were not significantly modified by the operation. Recurrence rates were 15 and 10 percent in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P= not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and functional long-term results of perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty are not influenced by surgical instruments and type of coloanal anastomosis. The clinical relevance of the short-term results in high-risk patients should be specifically investigated.

AB - PURPOSE: A randomized study was performed to assess whether new technologies offer advantages over the conventional technique on the clinical and functional outcome of patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence, submitted to Altemeier's procedure with levatorplasty. METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2003, 58 patients (55 females; mean age, 70.9 ± 11.3 years) with full-thickness rectal prolapse were evaluated with continence score, colonoscopy, anorectal manometry, anal electromyography, and sacral reflex latency; 40 of them were selected and randomly assigned to two groups: 20 patients (Group 1; 19 females, 73.4 ± 10.4 years) were submitted to a conventional operation with monopolar electrocautery and handsewn anastomosis, and 20 (Group 2; 18 females, 71.5 ± 12.2 years) using harmonic scalpel and circular stapler. Patients were followed up with clinical examination, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography, with mean follow-up 29.3 ± 8.5 and 27.5 ± 9.2 months in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. RESULTS: Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly reduced in Group 2 (P <0.001), whereas no differences were found in pain score, time to return to normal activity, morbidity, and mortality. Complications were two (10 percent) stenosis in Group 1. Fecal continence score significantly improved in both groups (P <0.01), whereas anorectal manometry and neurophysiologic data were not significantly modified by the operation. Recurrence rates were 15 and 10 percent in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P= not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and functional long-term results of perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty are not influenced by surgical instruments and type of coloanal anastomosis. The clinical relevance of the short-term results in high-risk patients should be specifically investigated.

KW - Full-thickness rectal prolapse

KW - Perineal rectosigmoidectomy

KW - Stapled coloanal anastomosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646547265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646547265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10350-006-0505-6

DO - 10.1007/s10350-006-0505-6

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 652

EP - 660

JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 5

ER -