Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on long-term percutaneous coronary interventions

Fabio Barili, Stefano Rosato, Paola D'Errigo, Alessandro Parolari, Danilo Fusco, Carlo Alberto Perucci, Lorenzo Menicanti, Fulvia Seccareccia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives The debate regarding the advantages and limitations of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has yet to be resolved. This study was designed to compare the impact of surgical technique on long-term mortality and subsequent revascularization. Methods The Predicting Long-Term Outcomes After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (PRIORITY) project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large, prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted in Italy between 2002 and 2004 and in 2007 and 2008. Clinical data on isolated CABG were compiled from 2 administrative databases. Results The study population consisted of 11,021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% off-pump CABG). Surgical strategy did not affect in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that on-pump CABG was the only factor that protected from in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention after surgery (odds ratio, 0.61). Although unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worse for off-pump CABG, adjustment did not confirm off-pump CABG as a risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.06). The on-pump CABG group had a significantly lower hospitalization for subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention, a finding confirmed even with adjustment for confounding factors (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.80; P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)902-909
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume150
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Bypass
Confidence Intervals
Mortality
Hospital Mortality
Italy
Multicenter Studies
Hospitalization
Cohort Studies
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Databases

Keywords

  • follow-up studies
  • revascularization
  • risk factors
  • surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on long-term percutaneous coronary interventions. / Barili, Fabio; Rosato, Stefano; D'Errigo, Paola; Parolari, Alessandro; Fusco, Danilo; Perucci, Carlo Alberto; Menicanti, Lorenzo; Seccareccia, Fulvia.

In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 150, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 902-909.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barili, Fabio ; Rosato, Stefano ; D'Errigo, Paola ; Parolari, Alessandro ; Fusco, Danilo ; Perucci, Carlo Alberto ; Menicanti, Lorenzo ; Seccareccia, Fulvia. / Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on long-term percutaneous coronary interventions. In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 150, No. 4. pp. 902-909.
@article{ae465010f8c54a688897d0ab2a7c5d7a,
title = "Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on long-term percutaneous coronary interventions",
abstract = "Objectives The debate regarding the advantages and limitations of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has yet to be resolved. This study was designed to compare the impact of surgical technique on long-term mortality and subsequent revascularization. Methods The Predicting Long-Term Outcomes After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (PRIORITY) project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large, prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted in Italy between 2002 and 2004 and in 2007 and 2008. Clinical data on isolated CABG were compiled from 2 administrative databases. Results The study population consisted of 11,021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2{\%} off-pump CABG). Surgical strategy did not affect in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that on-pump CABG was the only factor that protected from in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention after surgery (odds ratio, 0.61). Although unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worse for off-pump CABG, adjustment did not confirm off-pump CABG as a risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.87-1.06). The on-pump CABG group had a significantly lower hospitalization for subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention, a finding confirmed even with adjustment for confounding factors (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.62-0.80; P",
keywords = "follow-up studies, revascularization, risk factors, surgery",
author = "Fabio Barili and Stefano Rosato and Paola D'Errigo and Alessandro Parolari and Danilo Fusco and Perucci, {Carlo Alberto} and Lorenzo Menicanti and Fulvia Seccareccia",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.018",
language = "English",
volume = "150",
pages = "902--909",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "0022-5223",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on long-term percutaneous coronary interventions

AU - Barili, Fabio

AU - Rosato, Stefano

AU - D'Errigo, Paola

AU - Parolari, Alessandro

AU - Fusco, Danilo

AU - Perucci, Carlo Alberto

AU - Menicanti, Lorenzo

AU - Seccareccia, Fulvia

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Objectives The debate regarding the advantages and limitations of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has yet to be resolved. This study was designed to compare the impact of surgical technique on long-term mortality and subsequent revascularization. Methods The Predicting Long-Term Outcomes After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (PRIORITY) project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large, prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted in Italy between 2002 and 2004 and in 2007 and 2008. Clinical data on isolated CABG were compiled from 2 administrative databases. Results The study population consisted of 11,021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% off-pump CABG). Surgical strategy did not affect in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that on-pump CABG was the only factor that protected from in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention after surgery (odds ratio, 0.61). Although unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worse for off-pump CABG, adjustment did not confirm off-pump CABG as a risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.06). The on-pump CABG group had a significantly lower hospitalization for subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention, a finding confirmed even with adjustment for confounding factors (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.80; P

AB - Objectives The debate regarding the advantages and limitations of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has yet to be resolved. This study was designed to compare the impact of surgical technique on long-term mortality and subsequent revascularization. Methods The Predicting Long-Term Outcomes After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (PRIORITY) project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large, prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted in Italy between 2002 and 2004 and in 2007 and 2008. Clinical data on isolated CABG were compiled from 2 administrative databases. Results The study population consisted of 11,021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% off-pump CABG). Surgical strategy did not affect in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that on-pump CABG was the only factor that protected from in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention after surgery (odds ratio, 0.61). Although unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worse for off-pump CABG, adjustment did not confirm off-pump CABG as a risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.06). The on-pump CABG group had a significantly lower hospitalization for subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention, a finding confirmed even with adjustment for confounding factors (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.80; P

KW - follow-up studies

KW - revascularization

KW - risk factors

KW - surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942817751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942817751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 26277472

AN - SCOPUS:84942817751

VL - 150

SP - 902

EP - 909

JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 0022-5223

IS - 4

ER -