Implant rupture

Mauricio Resende; Cicero Urban; Mario Rietjens

doi:10.1007/978-88-470-2652-0_33

Implant rupture

Mauricio Resende, Cicero Urban, Mario Rietjens

Istituto Europeo di Oncologia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

Although rupture is one of the main causes of implant removal, its real rate is difficult to quantify, especially in breast reconstruction. Most of the ruptures have no obvious traumatic origin, and are silent or intracapsular, thus asymptomatic, and difficult to diagnose with conventional examinations (mammography and ultrasonography). Magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate method for implant failure diagnosis, but long-term cohort studies are necessary to evaluate integrity rates of these devices to better support their indications, follow-up, and limitations in breast reconstruction. The aim of this chapter is to address the incidence, evaluation, and management of implant rupture in breast reconstruction.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery
Publisher	Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.
Pages	321-324
Number of pages	4
ISBN (Print)	9788847026520, 9788847026513
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2652-0_33
Publication status	Published - Jan 1 2013

Keywords

Breast neoplasm
Breast reconstruction
Breast tumor
Internal breast prostheses
Mammaplasty
Silicone gels

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)

Access to Document

10.1007/978-88-470-2652-0_33

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Implant rupture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@inbook{b014c1e3b4d84680bce6504d998be897,

title = "Implant rupture",

abstract = "Although rupture is one of the main causes of implant removal, its real rate is difficult to quantify, especially in breast reconstruction. Most of the ruptures have no obvious traumatic origin, and are silent or intracapsular, thus asymptomatic, and difficult to diagnose with conventional examinations (mammography and ultrasonography). Magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate method for implant failure diagnosis, but long-term cohort studies are necessary to evaluate integrity rates of these devices to better support their indications, follow-up, and limitations in breast reconstruction. The aim of this chapter is to address the incidence, evaluation, and management of implant rupture in breast reconstruction.",

keywords = "Breast neoplasm, Breast reconstruction, Breast tumor, Internal breast prostheses, Mammaplasty, Silicone gels",

author = "Mauricio Resende and Cicero Urban and Mario Rietjens",

year = "2013",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-88-470-2652-0_33",

language = "English",

isbn = "9788847026520",

pages = "321--324",

booktitle = "Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery",

publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Implant rupture

AU - Resende, Mauricio

AU - Urban, Cicero

AU - Rietjens, Mario

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Although rupture is one of the main causes of implant removal, its real rate is difficult to quantify, especially in breast reconstruction. Most of the ruptures have no obvious traumatic origin, and are silent or intracapsular, thus asymptomatic, and difficult to diagnose with conventional examinations (mammography and ultrasonography). Magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate method for implant failure diagnosis, but long-term cohort studies are necessary to evaluate integrity rates of these devices to better support their indications, follow-up, and limitations in breast reconstruction. The aim of this chapter is to address the incidence, evaluation, and management of implant rupture in breast reconstruction.

AB - Although rupture is one of the main causes of implant removal, its real rate is difficult to quantify, especially in breast reconstruction. Most of the ruptures have no obvious traumatic origin, and are silent or intracapsular, thus asymptomatic, and difficult to diagnose with conventional examinations (mammography and ultrasonography). Magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate method for implant failure diagnosis, but long-term cohort studies are necessary to evaluate integrity rates of these devices to better support their indications, follow-up, and limitations in breast reconstruction. The aim of this chapter is to address the incidence, evaluation, and management of implant rupture in breast reconstruction.

KW - Breast neoplasm

KW - Breast reconstruction

KW - Breast tumor

KW - Internal breast prostheses

KW - Mammaplasty

KW - Silicone gels

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956846491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956846491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-88-470-2652-0_33

DO - 10.1007/978-88-470-2652-0_33

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84956846491

SN - 9788847026520

SN - 9788847026513

SP - 321

EP - 324

BT - Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery

PB - Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.

ER -