Implicit and explicit routes to recognize the own body: Evidence from brain damaged patients

Michela Candini, Marina Farinelli, Francesca Ferri, Stefano Avanzi, Daniela Cevolani, Vittorio Gallese, Georg Northoff, Francesca Frassinetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Much research suggested that recognizing our own body-parts and attributing a body-part to our physical self-likely involve distinct processes. Accordingly, facilitation for self-body-parts was found when an implicit, but not an explicit, self-recognition was required. Here, we assess whether implicit and explicit bodily self-recognition is mediated by different cerebral networks and can be selectively impaired after brain lesion. To this aim, right- (RBD) and left- (LBD) brain damaged patients and age-matched controls were presented with rotated pictures of either self- or other-people hands. In the Implicit task participants were submitted to hand laterality judgments. In the Explicit task they had to judge whether the hand belonged, or not, to them. In the Implicit task, controls and LBD patients, but not RBD patients, showed an advantage for self-body stimuli. In the Explicit task a disadvantage emerged for self-compared to others’ body stimuli in controls as well as in patients. Moreover, when we directly compared the performance of patients and controls, we found RBD, but not LBD, patients to be impaired in both the implicit and explicit recognition of self-body-part stimuli. Conversely, no differences were found for others’ body-part stimuli. Crucially, 40% RBD patients showed a selective deficit for implicit processing of self-body-part stimuli, whereas 27% of them showed a selective deficit in the explicit recognition of their own body. Additionally, we provide anatomical evidence revealing the neural basis of this dissociation. Based on both behavioral and anatomical data, we suggest that different areas of the right hemisphere underpin implicit and explicit self-body knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Article number405
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume10
Issue numberAUG2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 31 2016

Fingerprint

Human Body
Brain
Hand
Recognition (Psychology)
Research

Keywords

  • Body-part
  • Brain damaged patient
  • Implicit and explicit dissociation
  • Mental rotation
  • Self-other recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Implicit and explicit routes to recognize the own body : Evidence from brain damaged patients. / Candini, Michela; Farinelli, Marina; Ferri, Francesca; Avanzi, Stefano; Cevolani, Daniela; Gallese, Vittorio; Northoff, Georg; Frassinetti, Francesca.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 10, No. AUG2016, 405, 31.08.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Candini, Michela ; Farinelli, Marina ; Ferri, Francesca ; Avanzi, Stefano ; Cevolani, Daniela ; Gallese, Vittorio ; Northoff, Georg ; Frassinetti, Francesca. / Implicit and explicit routes to recognize the own body : Evidence from brain damaged patients. In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2016 ; Vol. 10, No. AUG2016.
@article{62722bfe62bd478db6dee2e30655cb66,
title = "Implicit and explicit routes to recognize the own body: Evidence from brain damaged patients",
abstract = "Much research suggested that recognizing our own body-parts and attributing a body-part to our physical self-likely involve distinct processes. Accordingly, facilitation for self-body-parts was found when an implicit, but not an explicit, self-recognition was required. Here, we assess whether implicit and explicit bodily self-recognition is mediated by different cerebral networks and can be selectively impaired after brain lesion. To this aim, right- (RBD) and left- (LBD) brain damaged patients and age-matched controls were presented with rotated pictures of either self- or other-people hands. In the Implicit task participants were submitted to hand laterality judgments. In the Explicit task they had to judge whether the hand belonged, or not, to them. In the Implicit task, controls and LBD patients, but not RBD patients, showed an advantage for self-body stimuli. In the Explicit task a disadvantage emerged for self-compared to others’ body stimuli in controls as well as in patients. Moreover, when we directly compared the performance of patients and controls, we found RBD, but not LBD, patients to be impaired in both the implicit and explicit recognition of self-body-part stimuli. Conversely, no differences were found for others’ body-part stimuli. Crucially, 40{\%} RBD patients showed a selective deficit for implicit processing of self-body-part stimuli, whereas 27{\%} of them showed a selective deficit in the explicit recognition of their own body. Additionally, we provide anatomical evidence revealing the neural basis of this dissociation. Based on both behavioral and anatomical data, we suggest that different areas of the right hemisphere underpin implicit and explicit self-body knowledge.",
keywords = "Body-part, Brain damaged patient, Implicit and explicit dissociation, Mental rotation, Self-other recognition",
author = "Michela Candini and Marina Farinelli and Francesca Ferri and Stefano Avanzi and Daniela Cevolani and Vittorio Gallese and Georg Northoff and Francesca Frassinetti",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "31",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2016.00405",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "AUG2016",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit and explicit routes to recognize the own body

T2 - Evidence from brain damaged patients

AU - Candini, Michela

AU - Farinelli, Marina

AU - Ferri, Francesca

AU - Avanzi, Stefano

AU - Cevolani, Daniela

AU - Gallese, Vittorio

AU - Northoff, Georg

AU - Frassinetti, Francesca

PY - 2016/8/31

Y1 - 2016/8/31

N2 - Much research suggested that recognizing our own body-parts and attributing a body-part to our physical self-likely involve distinct processes. Accordingly, facilitation for self-body-parts was found when an implicit, but not an explicit, self-recognition was required. Here, we assess whether implicit and explicit bodily self-recognition is mediated by different cerebral networks and can be selectively impaired after brain lesion. To this aim, right- (RBD) and left- (LBD) brain damaged patients and age-matched controls were presented with rotated pictures of either self- or other-people hands. In the Implicit task participants were submitted to hand laterality judgments. In the Explicit task they had to judge whether the hand belonged, or not, to them. In the Implicit task, controls and LBD patients, but not RBD patients, showed an advantage for self-body stimuli. In the Explicit task a disadvantage emerged for self-compared to others’ body stimuli in controls as well as in patients. Moreover, when we directly compared the performance of patients and controls, we found RBD, but not LBD, patients to be impaired in both the implicit and explicit recognition of self-body-part stimuli. Conversely, no differences were found for others’ body-part stimuli. Crucially, 40% RBD patients showed a selective deficit for implicit processing of self-body-part stimuli, whereas 27% of them showed a selective deficit in the explicit recognition of their own body. Additionally, we provide anatomical evidence revealing the neural basis of this dissociation. Based on both behavioral and anatomical data, we suggest that different areas of the right hemisphere underpin implicit and explicit self-body knowledge.

AB - Much research suggested that recognizing our own body-parts and attributing a body-part to our physical self-likely involve distinct processes. Accordingly, facilitation for self-body-parts was found when an implicit, but not an explicit, self-recognition was required. Here, we assess whether implicit and explicit bodily self-recognition is mediated by different cerebral networks and can be selectively impaired after brain lesion. To this aim, right- (RBD) and left- (LBD) brain damaged patients and age-matched controls were presented with rotated pictures of either self- or other-people hands. In the Implicit task participants were submitted to hand laterality judgments. In the Explicit task they had to judge whether the hand belonged, or not, to them. In the Implicit task, controls and LBD patients, but not RBD patients, showed an advantage for self-body stimuli. In the Explicit task a disadvantage emerged for self-compared to others’ body stimuli in controls as well as in patients. Moreover, when we directly compared the performance of patients and controls, we found RBD, but not LBD, patients to be impaired in both the implicit and explicit recognition of self-body-part stimuli. Conversely, no differences were found for others’ body-part stimuli. Crucially, 40% RBD patients showed a selective deficit for implicit processing of self-body-part stimuli, whereas 27% of them showed a selective deficit in the explicit recognition of their own body. Additionally, we provide anatomical evidence revealing the neural basis of this dissociation. Based on both behavioral and anatomical data, we suggest that different areas of the right hemisphere underpin implicit and explicit self-body knowledge.

KW - Body-part

KW - Brain damaged patient

KW - Implicit and explicit dissociation

KW - Mental rotation

KW - Self-other recognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988664534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988664534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00405

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00405

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988664534

VL - 10

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

IS - AUG2016

M1 - 405

ER -