Implicit versus explicit interference effects in a number-color synesthete

Ilaria Berteletti, Edward M. Hubbard, Marco Zorzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A fundamental question in the study of consciousness is the connection between subjective report and objective measures. We explored this question by testing NM, a grapheme-color synesthete, who experiences colors when viewing digits but not dot patterns. Synesthesia research has traditionally used variants of the Stroop paradigm as an objective correlate of these subjective synesthetic reports. We used both a classical synesthetic Digit Stroop task and a novel Numerosity Stroop task, in which random dot patterns were colored either congruently or incongruently with the colors NM reported for digits. We observed longer response times in the incongruent condition for both tasks, despite the fact that NM denied experiencing colors for random dot patterns, constituting a clear dissociation between subjective and objective measures of synesthetic experience. We argue that distinguishing synesthesia from learned synesthesia-like associations (pseudosynesthesia) should depend primarily on the presence of subjective reports, validated by objective measures. More generally, we suggest that consciously and unconsciously mediated interference may arise from qualitatively different mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-177
Number of pages8
JournalCortex
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Color
Stroop Test
Consciousness
Reaction Time
Research
Synesthesia

Keywords

  • Consciousness
  • Pseudosynesthesia
  • Stroop task
  • Synesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Implicit versus explicit interference effects in a number-color synesthete. / Berteletti, Ilaria; Hubbard, Edward M.; Zorzi, Marco.

In: Cortex, Vol. 46, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 170-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berteletti, Ilaria ; Hubbard, Edward M. ; Zorzi, Marco. / Implicit versus explicit interference effects in a number-color synesthete. In: Cortex. 2010 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 170-177.
@article{056065d8053145779255eea5f3512ecc,
title = "Implicit versus explicit interference effects in a number-color synesthete",
abstract = "A fundamental question in the study of consciousness is the connection between subjective report and objective measures. We explored this question by testing NM, a grapheme-color synesthete, who experiences colors when viewing digits but not dot patterns. Synesthesia research has traditionally used variants of the Stroop paradigm as an objective correlate of these subjective synesthetic reports. We used both a classical synesthetic Digit Stroop task and a novel Numerosity Stroop task, in which random dot patterns were colored either congruently or incongruently with the colors NM reported for digits. We observed longer response times in the incongruent condition for both tasks, despite the fact that NM denied experiencing colors for random dot patterns, constituting a clear dissociation between subjective and objective measures of synesthetic experience. We argue that distinguishing synesthesia from learned synesthesia-like associations (pseudosynesthesia) should depend primarily on the presence of subjective reports, validated by objective measures. More generally, we suggest that consciously and unconsciously mediated interference may arise from qualitatively different mechanisms.",
keywords = "Consciousness, Pseudosynesthesia, Stroop task, Synesthesia",
author = "Ilaria Berteletti and Hubbard, {Edward M.} and Marco Zorzi",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.cortex.2008.12.009",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "170--177",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Masson SpA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit versus explicit interference effects in a number-color synesthete

AU - Berteletti, Ilaria

AU - Hubbard, Edward M.

AU - Zorzi, Marco

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - A fundamental question in the study of consciousness is the connection between subjective report and objective measures. We explored this question by testing NM, a grapheme-color synesthete, who experiences colors when viewing digits but not dot patterns. Synesthesia research has traditionally used variants of the Stroop paradigm as an objective correlate of these subjective synesthetic reports. We used both a classical synesthetic Digit Stroop task and a novel Numerosity Stroop task, in which random dot patterns were colored either congruently or incongruently with the colors NM reported for digits. We observed longer response times in the incongruent condition for both tasks, despite the fact that NM denied experiencing colors for random dot patterns, constituting a clear dissociation between subjective and objective measures of synesthetic experience. We argue that distinguishing synesthesia from learned synesthesia-like associations (pseudosynesthesia) should depend primarily on the presence of subjective reports, validated by objective measures. More generally, we suggest that consciously and unconsciously mediated interference may arise from qualitatively different mechanisms.

AB - A fundamental question in the study of consciousness is the connection between subjective report and objective measures. We explored this question by testing NM, a grapheme-color synesthete, who experiences colors when viewing digits but not dot patterns. Synesthesia research has traditionally used variants of the Stroop paradigm as an objective correlate of these subjective synesthetic reports. We used both a classical synesthetic Digit Stroop task and a novel Numerosity Stroop task, in which random dot patterns were colored either congruently or incongruently with the colors NM reported for digits. We observed longer response times in the incongruent condition for both tasks, despite the fact that NM denied experiencing colors for random dot patterns, constituting a clear dissociation between subjective and objective measures of synesthetic experience. We argue that distinguishing synesthesia from learned synesthesia-like associations (pseudosynesthesia) should depend primarily on the presence of subjective reports, validated by objective measures. More generally, we suggest that consciously and unconsciously mediated interference may arise from qualitatively different mechanisms.

KW - Consciousness

KW - Pseudosynesthesia

KW - Stroop task

KW - Synesthesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74449086989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74449086989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.12.009

DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.12.009

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 170

EP - 177

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

IS - 2

ER -