Improved reproducibility of right ventricular volumes and function estimation from cardiac magnetic resonance images using level-set models

Oronzo Catalano, Cristiana Corsi, Serena Antonaci, Guido Moro, Maria Mussida, Mauro Frascaroli, Maurizia Baldi, Enrico Caiani, Claudio Lamberti, Franco Cobelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study aims to assess whether an alternative method, that is based on volumetric surface detection (VoSD) without tracing and is totally free of geometric assumptions, can improve the reproducibility of right ventricular (RV) volume quantification from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images, in comparison with a conventional disk-area technique. In a sample of 23 patients, with wide variability of RV end-diastolic volume (EDV: 47-131 ml), end-systolic volume (ESV: 20-76 ml), and ejection fraction (EF: 29-73%), using the standard method (Argus, Siemens) as the reference, the VoSD method showed good agreement for EDV, ESV, and EF estimations (correlation coefficient: 0.91, 0.94, and 0.94; Bland-Altman biases: 1 ml, 1 ml, and 0%; limits of agreement: ±16 ml, ±11 ml, and ±11%, respectively). An analysis of the reproducibility of the two methods showed lower intraobserver variability for the VoSD method than for the conventional method, as evidenced by the coefficient of variability (CoV) values (2-6% vs. 8-15%; P <0.05). In addition, the VoSD method showed improved interobserver reproducibility (7-10% vs. 8-15%), but the difference was statistically significant only for EF estimation variability (8 vs. 15%, P <0.05). In conclusion, the newly developed VoSD technique allows accurate measurements of RV volumes and function, and appears to be more reproducible than the conventional methodology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)600-605
Number of pages6
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medicine
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Right Ventricular Function
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Cardiac Volume
Observer Variation
Stroke Volume

Keywords

  • Computer analysis
  • Global ventricular function
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Right ventricle
  • Vetricular volume

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Improved reproducibility of right ventricular volumes and function estimation from cardiac magnetic resonance images using level-set models. / Catalano, Oronzo; Corsi, Cristiana; Antonaci, Serena; Moro, Guido; Mussida, Maria; Frascaroli, Mauro; Baldi, Maurizia; Caiani, Enrico; Lamberti, Claudio; Cobelli, Franco.

In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 57, No. 3, 03.2007, p. 600-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Catalano, O, Corsi, C, Antonaci, S, Moro, G, Mussida, M, Frascaroli, M, Baldi, M, Caiani, E, Lamberti, C & Cobelli, F 2007, 'Improved reproducibility of right ventricular volumes and function estimation from cardiac magnetic resonance images using level-set models', Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 600-605. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21157
Catalano, Oronzo ; Corsi, Cristiana ; Antonaci, Serena ; Moro, Guido ; Mussida, Maria ; Frascaroli, Mauro ; Baldi, Maurizia ; Caiani, Enrico ; Lamberti, Claudio ; Cobelli, Franco. / Improved reproducibility of right ventricular volumes and function estimation from cardiac magnetic resonance images using level-set models. In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 57, No. 3. pp. 600-605.
@article{636d3f8b5d794bdabf289922b3815b8f,
title = "Improved reproducibility of right ventricular volumes and function estimation from cardiac magnetic resonance images using level-set models",
abstract = "This study aims to assess whether an alternative method, that is based on volumetric surface detection (VoSD) without tracing and is totally free of geometric assumptions, can improve the reproducibility of right ventricular (RV) volume quantification from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images, in comparison with a conventional disk-area technique. In a sample of 23 patients, with wide variability of RV end-diastolic volume (EDV: 47-131 ml), end-systolic volume (ESV: 20-76 ml), and ejection fraction (EF: 29-73{\%}), using the standard method (Argus, Siemens) as the reference, the VoSD method showed good agreement for EDV, ESV, and EF estimations (correlation coefficient: 0.91, 0.94, and 0.94; Bland-Altman biases: 1 ml, 1 ml, and 0{\%}; limits of agreement: ±16 ml, ±11 ml, and ±11{\%}, respectively). An analysis of the reproducibility of the two methods showed lower intraobserver variability for the VoSD method than for the conventional method, as evidenced by the coefficient of variability (CoV) values (2-6{\%} vs. 8-15{\%}; P <0.05). In addition, the VoSD method showed improved interobserver reproducibility (7-10{\%} vs. 8-15{\%}), but the difference was statistically significant only for EF estimation variability (8 vs. 15{\%}, P <0.05). In conclusion, the newly developed VoSD technique allows accurate measurements of RV volumes and function, and appears to be more reproducible than the conventional methodology.",
keywords = "Computer analysis, Global ventricular function, Magnetic resonance imaging, Right ventricle, Vetricular volume",
author = "Oronzo Catalano and Cristiana Corsi and Serena Antonaci and Guido Moro and Maria Mussida and Mauro Frascaroli and Maurizia Baldi and Enrico Caiani and Claudio Lamberti and Franco Cobelli",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/mrm.21157",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "600--605",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance in Medicine",
issn = "0740-3194",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved reproducibility of right ventricular volumes and function estimation from cardiac magnetic resonance images using level-set models

AU - Catalano, Oronzo

AU - Corsi, Cristiana

AU - Antonaci, Serena

AU - Moro, Guido

AU - Mussida, Maria

AU - Frascaroli, Mauro

AU - Baldi, Maurizia

AU - Caiani, Enrico

AU - Lamberti, Claudio

AU - Cobelli, Franco

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - This study aims to assess whether an alternative method, that is based on volumetric surface detection (VoSD) without tracing and is totally free of geometric assumptions, can improve the reproducibility of right ventricular (RV) volume quantification from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images, in comparison with a conventional disk-area technique. In a sample of 23 patients, with wide variability of RV end-diastolic volume (EDV: 47-131 ml), end-systolic volume (ESV: 20-76 ml), and ejection fraction (EF: 29-73%), using the standard method (Argus, Siemens) as the reference, the VoSD method showed good agreement for EDV, ESV, and EF estimations (correlation coefficient: 0.91, 0.94, and 0.94; Bland-Altman biases: 1 ml, 1 ml, and 0%; limits of agreement: ±16 ml, ±11 ml, and ±11%, respectively). An analysis of the reproducibility of the two methods showed lower intraobserver variability for the VoSD method than for the conventional method, as evidenced by the coefficient of variability (CoV) values (2-6% vs. 8-15%; P <0.05). In addition, the VoSD method showed improved interobserver reproducibility (7-10% vs. 8-15%), but the difference was statistically significant only for EF estimation variability (8 vs. 15%, P <0.05). In conclusion, the newly developed VoSD technique allows accurate measurements of RV volumes and function, and appears to be more reproducible than the conventional methodology.

AB - This study aims to assess whether an alternative method, that is based on volumetric surface detection (VoSD) without tracing and is totally free of geometric assumptions, can improve the reproducibility of right ventricular (RV) volume quantification from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images, in comparison with a conventional disk-area technique. In a sample of 23 patients, with wide variability of RV end-diastolic volume (EDV: 47-131 ml), end-systolic volume (ESV: 20-76 ml), and ejection fraction (EF: 29-73%), using the standard method (Argus, Siemens) as the reference, the VoSD method showed good agreement for EDV, ESV, and EF estimations (correlation coefficient: 0.91, 0.94, and 0.94; Bland-Altman biases: 1 ml, 1 ml, and 0%; limits of agreement: ±16 ml, ±11 ml, and ±11%, respectively). An analysis of the reproducibility of the two methods showed lower intraobserver variability for the VoSD method than for the conventional method, as evidenced by the coefficient of variability (CoV) values (2-6% vs. 8-15%; P <0.05). In addition, the VoSD method showed improved interobserver reproducibility (7-10% vs. 8-15%), but the difference was statistically significant only for EF estimation variability (8 vs. 15%, P <0.05). In conclusion, the newly developed VoSD technique allows accurate measurements of RV volumes and function, and appears to be more reproducible than the conventional methodology.

KW - Computer analysis

KW - Global ventricular function

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Right ventricle

KW - Vetricular volume

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847767161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847767161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mrm.21157

DO - 10.1002/mrm.21157

M3 - Article

C2 - 17326180

AN - SCOPUS:33847767161

VL - 57

SP - 600

EP - 605

JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

SN - 0740-3194

IS - 3

ER -