Improving the outcome of liver transplantation with very old donors with updated selection and management criteria

Matteo Cescon, Gian Luca Grazi, Alessandro Cucchetti, Matteo Ravaioli, Giorgio Ercolani, Marco Vivarelli, Antonietta D'Errico, Massimo Del Gaudio, Antonio Daniele Pinna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advanced donor age is a risk factor for poor outcome in liver transplantation (LT). We reviewed 553 consecutive transplants according to donor age categories [group 1 (n = 173): 30%, and the lowest ischemia time. Five-year graft survival was significantly higher in group 1 (75%) versus groups 3 (60%) and 4 (62%; P = 0.01 and P = 0.001, respectively) and in group 5 (81%) versus groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). Donor age of 60-79 years, recipient hepatitis C virus-positive status, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score ≥ 25, and emergency LT were predictors of poor survival. In hepatitis C virus-positive patients, 5-year graft survival was 72% in group 1, 85% in group 2,52% in group 3,65% in group 4, and 71% in group 5 (group 1 versus group 3, P = 0.04; group 2 versus group 3, P = 0.03). In conclusion, older donor grafts managed with routine graft biopsy and short ischemia time may work effectively, regardless of the severity of the recipient's liver disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)672-679
Number of pages8
JournalLiver Transplantation
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Liver Transplantation
Patient Selection
Tissue Donors
Graft Survival
Transplants
Hepacivirus
Ischemia
End Stage Liver Disease
Liver Diseases
Emergencies
Age Groups
Biopsy
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Improving the outcome of liver transplantation with very old donors with updated selection and management criteria. / Cescon, Matteo; Grazi, Gian Luca; Cucchetti, Alessandro; Ravaioli, Matteo; Ercolani, Giorgio; Vivarelli, Marco; D'Errico, Antonietta; Del Gaudio, Massimo; Pinna, Antonio Daniele.

In: Liver Transplantation, Vol. 14, No. 5, 05.2008, p. 672-679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cescon, M, Grazi, GL, Cucchetti, A, Ravaioli, M, Ercolani, G, Vivarelli, M, D'Errico, A, Del Gaudio, M & Pinna, AD 2008, 'Improving the outcome of liver transplantation with very old donors with updated selection and management criteria', Liver Transplantation, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 672-679. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.21433
Cescon, Matteo ; Grazi, Gian Luca ; Cucchetti, Alessandro ; Ravaioli, Matteo ; Ercolani, Giorgio ; Vivarelli, Marco ; D'Errico, Antonietta ; Del Gaudio, Massimo ; Pinna, Antonio Daniele. / Improving the outcome of liver transplantation with very old donors with updated selection and management criteria. In: Liver Transplantation. 2008 ; Vol. 14, No. 5. pp. 672-679.
@article{61b4446d0e11405d9beb03b0cf3ed34e,
title = "Improving the outcome of liver transplantation with very old donors with updated selection and management criteria",
abstract = "Advanced donor age is a risk factor for poor outcome in liver transplantation (LT). We reviewed 553 consecutive transplants according to donor age categories [group 1 (n = 173): 30{\%}, and the lowest ischemia time. Five-year graft survival was significantly higher in group 1 (75{\%}) versus groups 3 (60{\%}) and 4 (62{\%}; P = 0.01 and P = 0.001, respectively) and in group 5 (81{\%}) versus groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). Donor age of 60-79 years, recipient hepatitis C virus-positive status, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score ≥ 25, and emergency LT were predictors of poor survival. In hepatitis C virus-positive patients, 5-year graft survival was 72{\%} in group 1, 85{\%} in group 2,52{\%} in group 3,65{\%} in group 4, and 71{\%} in group 5 (group 1 versus group 3, P = 0.04; group 2 versus group 3, P = 0.03). In conclusion, older donor grafts managed with routine graft biopsy and short ischemia time may work effectively, regardless of the severity of the recipient's liver disease.",
author = "Matteo Cescon and Grazi, {Gian Luca} and Alessandro Cucchetti and Matteo Ravaioli and Giorgio Ercolani and Marco Vivarelli and Antonietta D'Errico and {Del Gaudio}, Massimo and Pinna, {Antonio Daniele}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/lt.21433",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "672--679",
journal = "Liver Transplantation",
issn = "1527-6465",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the outcome of liver transplantation with very old donors with updated selection and management criteria

AU - Cescon, Matteo

AU - Grazi, Gian Luca

AU - Cucchetti, Alessandro

AU - Ravaioli, Matteo

AU - Ercolani, Giorgio

AU - Vivarelli, Marco

AU - D'Errico, Antonietta

AU - Del Gaudio, Massimo

AU - Pinna, Antonio Daniele

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Advanced donor age is a risk factor for poor outcome in liver transplantation (LT). We reviewed 553 consecutive transplants according to donor age categories [group 1 (n = 173): 30%, and the lowest ischemia time. Five-year graft survival was significantly higher in group 1 (75%) versus groups 3 (60%) and 4 (62%; P = 0.01 and P = 0.001, respectively) and in group 5 (81%) versus groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). Donor age of 60-79 years, recipient hepatitis C virus-positive status, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score ≥ 25, and emergency LT were predictors of poor survival. In hepatitis C virus-positive patients, 5-year graft survival was 72% in group 1, 85% in group 2,52% in group 3,65% in group 4, and 71% in group 5 (group 1 versus group 3, P = 0.04; group 2 versus group 3, P = 0.03). In conclusion, older donor grafts managed with routine graft biopsy and short ischemia time may work effectively, regardless of the severity of the recipient's liver disease.

AB - Advanced donor age is a risk factor for poor outcome in liver transplantation (LT). We reviewed 553 consecutive transplants according to donor age categories [group 1 (n = 173): 30%, and the lowest ischemia time. Five-year graft survival was significantly higher in group 1 (75%) versus groups 3 (60%) and 4 (62%; P = 0.01 and P = 0.001, respectively) and in group 5 (81%) versus groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). Donor age of 60-79 years, recipient hepatitis C virus-positive status, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score ≥ 25, and emergency LT were predictors of poor survival. In hepatitis C virus-positive patients, 5-year graft survival was 72% in group 1, 85% in group 2,52% in group 3,65% in group 4, and 71% in group 5 (group 1 versus group 3, P = 0.04; group 2 versus group 3, P = 0.03). In conclusion, older donor grafts managed with routine graft biopsy and short ischemia time may work effectively, regardless of the severity of the recipient's liver disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43849106441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43849106441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lt.21433

DO - 10.1002/lt.21433

M3 - Article

C2 - 18433035

AN - SCOPUS:43849106441

VL - 14

SP - 672

EP - 679

JO - Liver Transplantation

JF - Liver Transplantation

SN - 1527-6465

IS - 5

ER -