In normal subjects bracing impairs the function of the inspiratory muscles

E. Prandi, J. Couture, F. Bellemare

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Normal subjects can increase their capacity to sustain hyperpnoea by bracing their arms on fixed objects, a procedure which is also known to reduce dyspnoea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the present study, it was tested whether bracing per se could improve the function of the diaphragm. The effect of bracing on diaphragm function was studied in six normal subjects by recording changes in oesophageal (ΔPoes) and transdiaphragmatic (ΔPdi) pressure during inspiratory capacity (IC) manoeuvres in the seated and upright postures, and in the seated posture, also during bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation (BPNS) at functional residual capacity (FRC). The pattern of ribcage motion and deformation associated with bracing and with diaphragm contraction was also evaluated using inductance plethysmography and magnetometers. Bracing increased FRC by >300 mL and reduced IC by ~200 mL, in both postures. ΔPdi during BPNS decreased on average by 15% indicating an impaired diaphragmatic function. The ribcage was deformed with bracing and was more distortable during BPNS. In conclusion, in normal subjects, bracing impairs the function of the inspiratory muscles and reduces ribcage stability. These negative effects cannot explain the improved capacity to sustain hyperpnoea when the arms are braced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1078-1085
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Phrenic Nerve
Diaphragm
Posture
Inspiratory Capacity
Functional Residual Capacity
Muscles
Plethysmography
Dyspnea
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Pressure
Rib Cage

Keywords

  • Chest wall mechanics
  • Diaphragm
  • Phrenic nerve stimulation
  • Respiratory muscle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

In normal subjects bracing impairs the function of the inspiratory muscles. / Prandi, E.; Couture, J.; Bellemare, F.

In: European Respiratory Journal, Vol. 13, No. 5, 1999, p. 1078-1085.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prandi, E. ; Couture, J. ; Bellemare, F. / In normal subjects bracing impairs the function of the inspiratory muscles. In: European Respiratory Journal. 1999 ; Vol. 13, No. 5. pp. 1078-1085.
@article{3620168633ed4bb7a060aebc121c0f7d,
title = "In normal subjects bracing impairs the function of the inspiratory muscles",
abstract = "Normal subjects can increase their capacity to sustain hyperpnoea by bracing their arms on fixed objects, a procedure which is also known to reduce dyspnoea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the present study, it was tested whether bracing per se could improve the function of the diaphragm. The effect of bracing on diaphragm function was studied in six normal subjects by recording changes in oesophageal (ΔPoes) and transdiaphragmatic (ΔPdi) pressure during inspiratory capacity (IC) manoeuvres in the seated and upright postures, and in the seated posture, also during bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation (BPNS) at functional residual capacity (FRC). The pattern of ribcage motion and deformation associated with bracing and with diaphragm contraction was also evaluated using inductance plethysmography and magnetometers. Bracing increased FRC by >300 mL and reduced IC by ~200 mL, in both postures. ΔPdi during BPNS decreased on average by 15{\%} indicating an impaired diaphragmatic function. The ribcage was deformed with bracing and was more distortable during BPNS. In conclusion, in normal subjects, bracing impairs the function of the inspiratory muscles and reduces ribcage stability. These negative effects cannot explain the improved capacity to sustain hyperpnoea when the arms are braced.",
keywords = "Chest wall mechanics, Diaphragm, Phrenic nerve stimulation, Respiratory muscle",
author = "E. Prandi and J. Couture and F. Bellemare",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13e23.x",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1078--1085",
journal = "European Journal of Respiratory Diseases",
issn = "0903-1936",
publisher = "European Respiratory Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In normal subjects bracing impairs the function of the inspiratory muscles

AU - Prandi, E.

AU - Couture, J.

AU - Bellemare, F.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Normal subjects can increase their capacity to sustain hyperpnoea by bracing their arms on fixed objects, a procedure which is also known to reduce dyspnoea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the present study, it was tested whether bracing per se could improve the function of the diaphragm. The effect of bracing on diaphragm function was studied in six normal subjects by recording changes in oesophageal (ΔPoes) and transdiaphragmatic (ΔPdi) pressure during inspiratory capacity (IC) manoeuvres in the seated and upright postures, and in the seated posture, also during bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation (BPNS) at functional residual capacity (FRC). The pattern of ribcage motion and deformation associated with bracing and with diaphragm contraction was also evaluated using inductance plethysmography and magnetometers. Bracing increased FRC by >300 mL and reduced IC by ~200 mL, in both postures. ΔPdi during BPNS decreased on average by 15% indicating an impaired diaphragmatic function. The ribcage was deformed with bracing and was more distortable during BPNS. In conclusion, in normal subjects, bracing impairs the function of the inspiratory muscles and reduces ribcage stability. These negative effects cannot explain the improved capacity to sustain hyperpnoea when the arms are braced.

AB - Normal subjects can increase their capacity to sustain hyperpnoea by bracing their arms on fixed objects, a procedure which is also known to reduce dyspnoea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the present study, it was tested whether bracing per se could improve the function of the diaphragm. The effect of bracing on diaphragm function was studied in six normal subjects by recording changes in oesophageal (ΔPoes) and transdiaphragmatic (ΔPdi) pressure during inspiratory capacity (IC) manoeuvres in the seated and upright postures, and in the seated posture, also during bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation (BPNS) at functional residual capacity (FRC). The pattern of ribcage motion and deformation associated with bracing and with diaphragm contraction was also evaluated using inductance plethysmography and magnetometers. Bracing increased FRC by >300 mL and reduced IC by ~200 mL, in both postures. ΔPdi during BPNS decreased on average by 15% indicating an impaired diaphragmatic function. The ribcage was deformed with bracing and was more distortable during BPNS. In conclusion, in normal subjects, bracing impairs the function of the inspiratory muscles and reduces ribcage stability. These negative effects cannot explain the improved capacity to sustain hyperpnoea when the arms are braced.

KW - Chest wall mechanics

KW - Diaphragm

KW - Phrenic nerve stimulation

KW - Respiratory muscle

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033038769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033038769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13e23.x

DO - 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13e23.x

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1078

EP - 1085

JO - European Journal of Respiratory Diseases

JF - European Journal of Respiratory Diseases

SN - 0903-1936

IS - 5

ER -