In search for a gold-standard procedure to count motor neurons in the spinal cord

Michela Ferrucci, Gloria Lazzeri, Marina Flaibani, Francesca Biagioni, Federica Cantini, Michele Madonna, Domenico Bucci, Fiona Limanaqi, Paola Soldani, Francesco Fornai

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Counting motor neurons within the spinal cord and brainstem represents a seminal step to comprehend the anatomy and physiology of the final common pathway sourcing from the CNS. Motor neuron loss allows to assess the severity of motor neuron disorders while providing a tool to assess disease modifying effects. Counting motor neurons at first implies gold standard identification methods. In fact, motor neurons may occur within mixed nuclei housing a considerable amount of neurons other than motor neurons. In the present review, we analyse various approaches to count motor neurons emphasizing both the benefits and bias of each protocol. A special emphasis is placed on discussing automated stereology. When automated stereology does not take into account sitespecificity and does not distinguish between heterogeneous neuronal populations, it may confound data making such a procedure a sort of “guide for the perplex”. Thus, if on the one hand automated stereology improves our ability to quantify neuronal populations, it may also hide false positives/negatives in neuronal counts. For instance, classic staining for antigens such as SMI-32, SMN and ChAT, which are routinely considered to be specific for motor neurons, may also occur in other neuronal types of the spinal cord. Even site specificity within Lamina IX may be misleading due to neuronal populations having a size and shape typical of motor neurons. This is the case of spinal border cells, which often surpass the border of Lamina VII and intermingle with motor neurons of Lamina IX. The present article discusses the need to join automated stereology with a dedicated knowledge of each specific neuroanatomical setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1021-1046
Number of pages26
JournalHistology and Histopathology
Volume33
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Motor Neurons
Gold
Spinal Cord
Population
Aptitude
Brain Stem
Anatomy
Staining and Labeling
Neurons
Antigens

Keywords

  • Brainstem
  • Light microscopy
  • Motor neurons
  • Spinal cord
  • Stereology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology

Cite this

In search for a gold-standard procedure to count motor neurons in the spinal cord. / Ferrucci, Michela; Lazzeri, Gloria; Flaibani, Marina; Biagioni, Francesca; Cantini, Federica; Madonna, Michele; Bucci, Domenico; Limanaqi, Fiona; Soldani, Paola; Fornai, Francesco.

In: Histology and Histopathology, Vol. 33, No. 10, 01.10.2018, p. 1021-1046.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Ferrucci, M, Lazzeri, G, Flaibani, M, Biagioni, F, Cantini, F, Madonna, M, Bucci, D, Limanaqi, F, Soldani, P & Fornai, F 2018, 'In search for a gold-standard procedure to count motor neurons in the spinal cord', Histology and Histopathology, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1021-1046. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-11-983
Ferrucci, Michela ; Lazzeri, Gloria ; Flaibani, Marina ; Biagioni, Francesca ; Cantini, Federica ; Madonna, Michele ; Bucci, Domenico ; Limanaqi, Fiona ; Soldani, Paola ; Fornai, Francesco. / In search for a gold-standard procedure to count motor neurons in the spinal cord. In: Histology and Histopathology. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 10. pp. 1021-1046.
@article{6f9ee7cae58544c399b4e476db4d03d1,
title = "In search for a gold-standard procedure to count motor neurons in the spinal cord",
abstract = "Counting motor neurons within the spinal cord and brainstem represents a seminal step to comprehend the anatomy and physiology of the final common pathway sourcing from the CNS. Motor neuron loss allows to assess the severity of motor neuron disorders while providing a tool to assess disease modifying effects. Counting motor neurons at first implies gold standard identification methods. In fact, motor neurons may occur within mixed nuclei housing a considerable amount of neurons other than motor neurons. In the present review, we analyse various approaches to count motor neurons emphasizing both the benefits and bias of each protocol. A special emphasis is placed on discussing automated stereology. When automated stereology does not take into account sitespecificity and does not distinguish between heterogeneous neuronal populations, it may confound data making such a procedure a sort of “guide for the perplex”. Thus, if on the one hand automated stereology improves our ability to quantify neuronal populations, it may also hide false positives/negatives in neuronal counts. For instance, classic staining for antigens such as SMI-32, SMN and ChAT, which are routinely considered to be specific for motor neurons, may also occur in other neuronal types of the spinal cord. Even site specificity within Lamina IX may be misleading due to neuronal populations having a size and shape typical of motor neurons. This is the case of spinal border cells, which often surpass the border of Lamina VII and intermingle with motor neurons of Lamina IX. The present article discusses the need to join automated stereology with a dedicated knowledge of each specific neuroanatomical setting.",
keywords = "Brainstem, Light microscopy, Motor neurons, Spinal cord, Stereology",
author = "Michela Ferrucci and Gloria Lazzeri and Marina Flaibani and Francesca Biagioni and Federica Cantini and Michele Madonna and Domenico Bucci and Fiona Limanaqi and Paola Soldani and Francesco Fornai",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14670/HH-11-983",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1021--1046",
journal = "Histology and Histopathology",
issn = "0213-3911",
publisher = "Histology and Histopathology",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In search for a gold-standard procedure to count motor neurons in the spinal cord

AU - Ferrucci, Michela

AU - Lazzeri, Gloria

AU - Flaibani, Marina

AU - Biagioni, Francesca

AU - Cantini, Federica

AU - Madonna, Michele

AU - Bucci, Domenico

AU - Limanaqi, Fiona

AU - Soldani, Paola

AU - Fornai, Francesco

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Counting motor neurons within the spinal cord and brainstem represents a seminal step to comprehend the anatomy and physiology of the final common pathway sourcing from the CNS. Motor neuron loss allows to assess the severity of motor neuron disorders while providing a tool to assess disease modifying effects. Counting motor neurons at first implies gold standard identification methods. In fact, motor neurons may occur within mixed nuclei housing a considerable amount of neurons other than motor neurons. In the present review, we analyse various approaches to count motor neurons emphasizing both the benefits and bias of each protocol. A special emphasis is placed on discussing automated stereology. When automated stereology does not take into account sitespecificity and does not distinguish between heterogeneous neuronal populations, it may confound data making such a procedure a sort of “guide for the perplex”. Thus, if on the one hand automated stereology improves our ability to quantify neuronal populations, it may also hide false positives/negatives in neuronal counts. For instance, classic staining for antigens such as SMI-32, SMN and ChAT, which are routinely considered to be specific for motor neurons, may also occur in other neuronal types of the spinal cord. Even site specificity within Lamina IX may be misleading due to neuronal populations having a size and shape typical of motor neurons. This is the case of spinal border cells, which often surpass the border of Lamina VII and intermingle with motor neurons of Lamina IX. The present article discusses the need to join automated stereology with a dedicated knowledge of each specific neuroanatomical setting.

AB - Counting motor neurons within the spinal cord and brainstem represents a seminal step to comprehend the anatomy and physiology of the final common pathway sourcing from the CNS. Motor neuron loss allows to assess the severity of motor neuron disorders while providing a tool to assess disease modifying effects. Counting motor neurons at first implies gold standard identification methods. In fact, motor neurons may occur within mixed nuclei housing a considerable amount of neurons other than motor neurons. In the present review, we analyse various approaches to count motor neurons emphasizing both the benefits and bias of each protocol. A special emphasis is placed on discussing automated stereology. When automated stereology does not take into account sitespecificity and does not distinguish between heterogeneous neuronal populations, it may confound data making such a procedure a sort of “guide for the perplex”. Thus, if on the one hand automated stereology improves our ability to quantify neuronal populations, it may also hide false positives/negatives in neuronal counts. For instance, classic staining for antigens such as SMI-32, SMN and ChAT, which are routinely considered to be specific for motor neurons, may also occur in other neuronal types of the spinal cord. Even site specificity within Lamina IX may be misleading due to neuronal populations having a size and shape typical of motor neurons. This is the case of spinal border cells, which often surpass the border of Lamina VII and intermingle with motor neurons of Lamina IX. The present article discusses the need to join automated stereology with a dedicated knowledge of each specific neuroanatomical setting.

KW - Brainstem

KW - Light microscopy

KW - Motor neurons

KW - Spinal cord

KW - Stereology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053198206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053198206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14670/HH-11-983

DO - 10.14670/HH-11-983

M3 - Review article

VL - 33

SP - 1021

EP - 1046

JO - Histology and Histopathology

JF - Histology and Histopathology

SN - 0213-3911

IS - 10

ER -