In silico and in vitro comparative analysis to select, validate and test SNPs for human identification

Emiliano Giardina, Ilenia Pietrangeli, Claudia Martone, Paola Asili, Irene Predazzi, Patrizio Marsala, Luciano Gabriele, Claudio Pipolo, Omero Ricci, Gianluca Solla, Luca Sineo, Aldo Spinella, Giuseppe Novelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The recent advances in human genetics have recently provided new insights into phenotypic variation and genome variability. Current forensic DNA techniques involve the search for genetic similarities and differences between biological samples. Consequently the selection of ideal genomic biomarkers for human identification is crucial in order to ensure the highest stability and reproducibility of results. Results: In the present study, we selected and validated 24 SNPs which are useful in human identification in 1,040 unrelated samples originating from three different populations (Italian, Benin Gulf and Mongolian). A Rigorous in silico selection of these markers provided a list of SNPs with very constant frequencies across the populations tested as demonstrated by the Fst values. Furthermore, these SNPs also showed a high specificity for the human genome (only 5 SNPs gave positive results when amplified in non-human DNA). Conclusion: Comparison between in silico and in vitro analysis showed that current SNPs databases can efficiently improve and facilitate the selection of markers because most of the analyses performed (Fst, r2, heterozigosity) in more than 1,000 samples confirmed available population data.

Original languageEnglish
Article number457
JournalBMC Genomics
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 12 2007

Fingerprint

Forensic Anthropology
Computer Simulation
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Population
Benin
DNA
Medical Genetics
Human Genome
Reproducibility of Results
Biomarkers
In Vitro Techniques
Genome
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

In silico and in vitro comparative analysis to select, validate and test SNPs for human identification. / Giardina, Emiliano; Pietrangeli, Ilenia; Martone, Claudia; Asili, Paola; Predazzi, Irene; Marsala, Patrizio; Gabriele, Luciano; Pipolo, Claudio; Ricci, Omero; Solla, Gianluca; Sineo, Luca; Spinella, Aldo; Novelli, Giuseppe.

In: BMC Genomics, Vol. 8, 457, 12.12.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giardina, E, Pietrangeli, I, Martone, C, Asili, P, Predazzi, I, Marsala, P, Gabriele, L, Pipolo, C, Ricci, O, Solla, G, Sineo, L, Spinella, A & Novelli, G 2007, 'In silico and in vitro comparative analysis to select, validate and test SNPs for human identification', BMC Genomics, vol. 8, 457. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-457
Giardina, Emiliano ; Pietrangeli, Ilenia ; Martone, Claudia ; Asili, Paola ; Predazzi, Irene ; Marsala, Patrizio ; Gabriele, Luciano ; Pipolo, Claudio ; Ricci, Omero ; Solla, Gianluca ; Sineo, Luca ; Spinella, Aldo ; Novelli, Giuseppe. / In silico and in vitro comparative analysis to select, validate and test SNPs for human identification. In: BMC Genomics. 2007 ; Vol. 8.
@article{2c37842bf8684ab1b1d49eed925c99c3,
title = "In silico and in vitro comparative analysis to select, validate and test SNPs for human identification",
abstract = "Background: The recent advances in human genetics have recently provided new insights into phenotypic variation and genome variability. Current forensic DNA techniques involve the search for genetic similarities and differences between biological samples. Consequently the selection of ideal genomic biomarkers for human identification is crucial in order to ensure the highest stability and reproducibility of results. Results: In the present study, we selected and validated 24 SNPs which are useful in human identification in 1,040 unrelated samples originating from three different populations (Italian, Benin Gulf and Mongolian). A Rigorous in silico selection of these markers provided a list of SNPs with very constant frequencies across the populations tested as demonstrated by the Fst values. Furthermore, these SNPs also showed a high specificity for the human genome (only 5 SNPs gave positive results when amplified in non-human DNA). Conclusion: Comparison between in silico and in vitro analysis showed that current SNPs databases can efficiently improve and facilitate the selection of markers because most of the analyses performed (Fst, r2, heterozigosity) in more than 1,000 samples confirmed available population data.",
author = "Emiliano Giardina and Ilenia Pietrangeli and Claudia Martone and Paola Asili and Irene Predazzi and Patrizio Marsala and Luciano Gabriele and Claudio Pipolo and Omero Ricci and Gianluca Solla and Luca Sineo and Aldo Spinella and Giuseppe Novelli",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2164-8-457",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMC Genomics",
issn = "1471-2164",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In silico and in vitro comparative analysis to select, validate and test SNPs for human identification

AU - Giardina, Emiliano

AU - Pietrangeli, Ilenia

AU - Martone, Claudia

AU - Asili, Paola

AU - Predazzi, Irene

AU - Marsala, Patrizio

AU - Gabriele, Luciano

AU - Pipolo, Claudio

AU - Ricci, Omero

AU - Solla, Gianluca

AU - Sineo, Luca

AU - Spinella, Aldo

AU - Novelli, Giuseppe

PY - 2007/12/12

Y1 - 2007/12/12

N2 - Background: The recent advances in human genetics have recently provided new insights into phenotypic variation and genome variability. Current forensic DNA techniques involve the search for genetic similarities and differences between biological samples. Consequently the selection of ideal genomic biomarkers for human identification is crucial in order to ensure the highest stability and reproducibility of results. Results: In the present study, we selected and validated 24 SNPs which are useful in human identification in 1,040 unrelated samples originating from three different populations (Italian, Benin Gulf and Mongolian). A Rigorous in silico selection of these markers provided a list of SNPs with very constant frequencies across the populations tested as demonstrated by the Fst values. Furthermore, these SNPs also showed a high specificity for the human genome (only 5 SNPs gave positive results when amplified in non-human DNA). Conclusion: Comparison between in silico and in vitro analysis showed that current SNPs databases can efficiently improve and facilitate the selection of markers because most of the analyses performed (Fst, r2, heterozigosity) in more than 1,000 samples confirmed available population data.

AB - Background: The recent advances in human genetics have recently provided new insights into phenotypic variation and genome variability. Current forensic DNA techniques involve the search for genetic similarities and differences between biological samples. Consequently the selection of ideal genomic biomarkers for human identification is crucial in order to ensure the highest stability and reproducibility of results. Results: In the present study, we selected and validated 24 SNPs which are useful in human identification in 1,040 unrelated samples originating from three different populations (Italian, Benin Gulf and Mongolian). A Rigorous in silico selection of these markers provided a list of SNPs with very constant frequencies across the populations tested as demonstrated by the Fst values. Furthermore, these SNPs also showed a high specificity for the human genome (only 5 SNPs gave positive results when amplified in non-human DNA). Conclusion: Comparison between in silico and in vitro analysis showed that current SNPs databases can efficiently improve and facilitate the selection of markers because most of the analyses performed (Fst, r2, heterozigosity) in more than 1,000 samples confirmed available population data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849149580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849149580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2164-8-457

DO - 10.1186/1471-2164-8-457

M3 - Article

C2 - 18076761

AN - SCOPUS:38849149580

VL - 8

JO - BMC Genomics

JF - BMC Genomics

SN - 1471-2164

M1 - 457

ER -