In vitro investigation of aluminum and fluoride release from compomers, conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements

A standardized approach

L. Savarino, M. Cervellati, S. Stea, D. Cavedagna, M. E. Donati, A. Pizzoferrato, M. Visentin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The amount of fluoride release from dental cements necessary for an anticariogenic effect is not established: moreover, the possible toxic effects due to high fluoride and aluminum release are not well known and the results are still controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate fluoride (F) and aluminum (Al) release from dental cements using a 'standardized approach' according to the end-use of the materials, i.e. biocompatibility testing. Two polyacid-modified resin composites of recent application, commonly called compomers (Dyract® and Dyract Cem®), were compared with two conventional acid-based (Fuji I(TM), Ketac-Cem®) and two resin-modified (Vitremer(TM), Vitrebond(TM)) glass-ionomer cements (GICs). All types of cement are used in dentistry and are commercially available. Extracts of the cements into minimum essential medium, after setting over a 1-h (group A) and 1-week (group B) period, were performed. The extraction conditions were rigorously standardized. Mean values +/- standard deviation of F- and A1-levels in such extracts were measured and were expressed as μgg-1 (micrograms of ions per gram of cement). A great difference in the amount of ion release, both F and A1, was shown among the tested materials. The GICs, as well as Ketac-Cem®, released more F and A1 than the compomers. All of the materials released the greatest proportion of ions when the extraction was performed in the first hour after mixing (group A). A1- and F-values showed a highly significant positive correlation, independently from the curing time. We conclude that the biological assessment of dental cements can be performed only if a pre-evaluation of the leachables is obtained by applying a standardized protocol which allows a useful comparison between the different materials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-300
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
Volume11
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Compomers
Dental Cements
Glass Ionomer Cements
Ionomers
Dental cement
Cements
Resins
Ions
Aluminum
Glass
Fluorides
Materials Testing
Poisons
Dentistry
Biocompatibility
Curing
Acids
aluminum fluoride
In Vitro Techniques
Testing

Keywords

  • Aluminum
  • Cement
  • Compomer
  • Fluoride
  • Release
  • Standardization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

In vitro investigation of aluminum and fluoride release from compomers, conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements : A standardized approach. / Savarino, L.; Cervellati, M.; Stea, S.; Cavedagna, D.; Donati, M. E.; Pizzoferrato, A.; Visentin, M.

In: Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2000, p. 289-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Savarino, L. ; Cervellati, M. ; Stea, S. ; Cavedagna, D. ; Donati, M. E. ; Pizzoferrato, A. ; Visentin, M. / In vitro investigation of aluminum and fluoride release from compomers, conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements : A standardized approach. In: Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. 2000 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 289-300.
@article{5c58b2d52aa8419486f5a1f4bde695e4,
title = "In vitro investigation of aluminum and fluoride release from compomers, conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: A standardized approach",
abstract = "The amount of fluoride release from dental cements necessary for an anticariogenic effect is not established: moreover, the possible toxic effects due to high fluoride and aluminum release are not well known and the results are still controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate fluoride (F) and aluminum (Al) release from dental cements using a 'standardized approach' according to the end-use of the materials, i.e. biocompatibility testing. Two polyacid-modified resin composites of recent application, commonly called compomers (Dyract{\circledR} and Dyract Cem{\circledR}), were compared with two conventional acid-based (Fuji I(TM), Ketac-Cem{\circledR}) and two resin-modified (Vitremer(TM), Vitrebond(TM)) glass-ionomer cements (GICs). All types of cement are used in dentistry and are commercially available. Extracts of the cements into minimum essential medium, after setting over a 1-h (group A) and 1-week (group B) period, were performed. The extraction conditions were rigorously standardized. Mean values +/- standard deviation of F- and A1-levels in such extracts were measured and were expressed as μgg-1 (micrograms of ions per gram of cement). A great difference in the amount of ion release, both F and A1, was shown among the tested materials. The GICs, as well as Ketac-Cem{\circledR}, released more F and A1 than the compomers. All of the materials released the greatest proportion of ions when the extraction was performed in the first hour after mixing (group A). A1- and F-values showed a highly significant positive correlation, independently from the curing time. We conclude that the biological assessment of dental cements can be performed only if a pre-evaluation of the leachables is obtained by applying a standardized protocol which allows a useful comparison between the different materials.",
keywords = "Aluminum, Cement, Compomer, Fluoride, Release, Standardization",
author = "L. Savarino and M. Cervellati and S. Stea and D. Cavedagna and Donati, {M. E.} and A. Pizzoferrato and M. Visentin",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "289--300",
journal = "Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition",
issn = "0920-5063",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In vitro investigation of aluminum and fluoride release from compomers, conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements

T2 - A standardized approach

AU - Savarino, L.

AU - Cervellati, M.

AU - Stea, S.

AU - Cavedagna, D.

AU - Donati, M. E.

AU - Pizzoferrato, A.

AU - Visentin, M.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The amount of fluoride release from dental cements necessary for an anticariogenic effect is not established: moreover, the possible toxic effects due to high fluoride and aluminum release are not well known and the results are still controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate fluoride (F) and aluminum (Al) release from dental cements using a 'standardized approach' according to the end-use of the materials, i.e. biocompatibility testing. Two polyacid-modified resin composites of recent application, commonly called compomers (Dyract® and Dyract Cem®), were compared with two conventional acid-based (Fuji I(TM), Ketac-Cem®) and two resin-modified (Vitremer(TM), Vitrebond(TM)) glass-ionomer cements (GICs). All types of cement are used in dentistry and are commercially available. Extracts of the cements into minimum essential medium, after setting over a 1-h (group A) and 1-week (group B) period, were performed. The extraction conditions were rigorously standardized. Mean values +/- standard deviation of F- and A1-levels in such extracts were measured and were expressed as μgg-1 (micrograms of ions per gram of cement). A great difference in the amount of ion release, both F and A1, was shown among the tested materials. The GICs, as well as Ketac-Cem®, released more F and A1 than the compomers. All of the materials released the greatest proportion of ions when the extraction was performed in the first hour after mixing (group A). A1- and F-values showed a highly significant positive correlation, independently from the curing time. We conclude that the biological assessment of dental cements can be performed only if a pre-evaluation of the leachables is obtained by applying a standardized protocol which allows a useful comparison between the different materials.

AB - The amount of fluoride release from dental cements necessary for an anticariogenic effect is not established: moreover, the possible toxic effects due to high fluoride and aluminum release are not well known and the results are still controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate fluoride (F) and aluminum (Al) release from dental cements using a 'standardized approach' according to the end-use of the materials, i.e. biocompatibility testing. Two polyacid-modified resin composites of recent application, commonly called compomers (Dyract® and Dyract Cem®), were compared with two conventional acid-based (Fuji I(TM), Ketac-Cem®) and two resin-modified (Vitremer(TM), Vitrebond(TM)) glass-ionomer cements (GICs). All types of cement are used in dentistry and are commercially available. Extracts of the cements into minimum essential medium, after setting over a 1-h (group A) and 1-week (group B) period, were performed. The extraction conditions were rigorously standardized. Mean values +/- standard deviation of F- and A1-levels in such extracts were measured and were expressed as μgg-1 (micrograms of ions per gram of cement). A great difference in the amount of ion release, both F and A1, was shown among the tested materials. The GICs, as well as Ketac-Cem®, released more F and A1 than the compomers. All of the materials released the greatest proportion of ions when the extraction was performed in the first hour after mixing (group A). A1- and F-values showed a highly significant positive correlation, independently from the curing time. We conclude that the biological assessment of dental cements can be performed only if a pre-evaluation of the leachables is obtained by applying a standardized protocol which allows a useful comparison between the different materials.

KW - Aluminum

KW - Cement

KW - Compomer

KW - Fluoride

KW - Release

KW - Standardization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034053316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034053316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 289

EP - 300

JO - Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition

JF - Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition

SN - 0920-5063

IS - 3

ER -