In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Michele Bandirali, Luca M. Sconfienza, Alberto Aliprandi, Giovanni Di Leo, Daniele Marchelli, Fabio M. Ulivieri, Francesco Sardanelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Our aim was to estimate the in vivo reproducibility of bone mineral density (BMD) at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to compare fast array, array, and high-definition scan modes. Materials and methods: A total of 378 patients (38 males and 340 females; mean age 63 ± 9 years) underwent DXA using a QDR-Discovery A densitometer (Hologic). Considering the three scan modes on lumbar spine and right femur, six independent groups of 30 patients were examined twice (for a total of 180 patients). Least significant change (LSC) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) were calculated. The remaining 198 patients underwent three scans of the lumbar spine (n = 92) or of the right femur (n = 106), one for each scan mode. The student t test and Bland-Altman analysis used were. Scan times were recorded and radiation dose was estimated using the ICRP60 method. Results: Intra-scan mode reproducibility was 98-99 %, corresponding to an LSC of 1.49-2.08 %. The SDD was 0.018-0.023 g/cm2 (lumbar spine) and 0.017-0.019 g/cm2 (right femur). All comparisons among scan modes were statistically significant (p <0.001) but lower than SDDs, i.e. not clinically relevant. Considering lumbar spine and the right femur, scan times were 50 and 38 s for fast array, 98 and 74 s for array, and 195 and 148 s for high definition, respectively; radiation doses were 6.7 and 4.7 μSv for fast array, and 13.3 and 9.3 μSv for both array and high definition, respectively. Conclusion: Since all BMD differences were lower than the SSDs, the three scan modes can be considered interchangeable. As a consequence, although the absolute reduction in time and radiation dose is relatively low, when BMD measurement is the aim of DXA, fast array can be generally preferred.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-260
Number of pages4
JournalRadiologia Medica
Volume119
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Photon Absorptiometry
Bone Density
Femur
Spine
Radiation
Silver Sulfadiazine
Students

Keywords

  • Bone mineral density
  • Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
  • Reproducibility
  • Scan modes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. / Bandirali, Michele; Sconfienza, Luca M.; Aliprandi, Alberto; Di Leo, Giovanni; Marchelli, Daniele; Ulivieri, Fabio M.; Sardanelli, Francesco.

In: Radiologia Medica, Vol. 119, No. 4, 2014, p. 257-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77dc91bad3ab440083947b41173a7457,
title = "In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry",
abstract = "Purpose: Our aim was to estimate the in vivo reproducibility of bone mineral density (BMD) at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to compare fast array, array, and high-definition scan modes. Materials and methods: A total of 378 patients (38 males and 340 females; mean age 63 ± 9 years) underwent DXA using a QDR-Discovery A densitometer (Hologic). Considering the three scan modes on lumbar spine and right femur, six independent groups of 30 patients were examined twice (for a total of 180 patients). Least significant change (LSC) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) were calculated. The remaining 198 patients underwent three scans of the lumbar spine (n = 92) or of the right femur (n = 106), one for each scan mode. The student t test and Bland-Altman analysis used were. Scan times were recorded and radiation dose was estimated using the ICRP60 method. Results: Intra-scan mode reproducibility was 98-99 {\%}, corresponding to an LSC of 1.49-2.08 {\%}. The SDD was 0.018-0.023 g/cm2 (lumbar spine) and 0.017-0.019 g/cm2 (right femur). All comparisons among scan modes were statistically significant (p <0.001) but lower than SDDs, i.e. not clinically relevant. Considering lumbar spine and the right femur, scan times were 50 and 38 s for fast array, 98 and 74 s for array, and 195 and 148 s for high definition, respectively; radiation doses were 6.7 and 4.7 μSv for fast array, and 13.3 and 9.3 μSv for both array and high definition, respectively. Conclusion: Since all BMD differences were lower than the SSDs, the three scan modes can be considered interchangeable. As a consequence, although the absolute reduction in time and radiation dose is relatively low, when BMD measurement is the aim of DXA, fast array can be generally preferred.",
keywords = "Bone mineral density, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Reproducibility, Scan modes",
author = "Michele Bandirali and Sconfienza, {Luca M.} and Alberto Aliprandi and {Di Leo}, Giovanni and Daniele Marchelli and Ulivieri, {Fabio M.} and Francesco Sardanelli",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11547-013-0342-3",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "257--260",
journal = "Radiologia Medica",
issn = "0033-8362",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

AU - Bandirali, Michele

AU - Sconfienza, Luca M.

AU - Aliprandi, Alberto

AU - Di Leo, Giovanni

AU - Marchelli, Daniele

AU - Ulivieri, Fabio M.

AU - Sardanelli, Francesco

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: Our aim was to estimate the in vivo reproducibility of bone mineral density (BMD) at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to compare fast array, array, and high-definition scan modes. Materials and methods: A total of 378 patients (38 males and 340 females; mean age 63 ± 9 years) underwent DXA using a QDR-Discovery A densitometer (Hologic). Considering the three scan modes on lumbar spine and right femur, six independent groups of 30 patients were examined twice (for a total of 180 patients). Least significant change (LSC) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) were calculated. The remaining 198 patients underwent three scans of the lumbar spine (n = 92) or of the right femur (n = 106), one for each scan mode. The student t test and Bland-Altman analysis used were. Scan times were recorded and radiation dose was estimated using the ICRP60 method. Results: Intra-scan mode reproducibility was 98-99 %, corresponding to an LSC of 1.49-2.08 %. The SDD was 0.018-0.023 g/cm2 (lumbar spine) and 0.017-0.019 g/cm2 (right femur). All comparisons among scan modes were statistically significant (p <0.001) but lower than SDDs, i.e. not clinically relevant. Considering lumbar spine and the right femur, scan times were 50 and 38 s for fast array, 98 and 74 s for array, and 195 and 148 s for high definition, respectively; radiation doses were 6.7 and 4.7 μSv for fast array, and 13.3 and 9.3 μSv for both array and high definition, respectively. Conclusion: Since all BMD differences were lower than the SSDs, the three scan modes can be considered interchangeable. As a consequence, although the absolute reduction in time and radiation dose is relatively low, when BMD measurement is the aim of DXA, fast array can be generally preferred.

AB - Purpose: Our aim was to estimate the in vivo reproducibility of bone mineral density (BMD) at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to compare fast array, array, and high-definition scan modes. Materials and methods: A total of 378 patients (38 males and 340 females; mean age 63 ± 9 years) underwent DXA using a QDR-Discovery A densitometer (Hologic). Considering the three scan modes on lumbar spine and right femur, six independent groups of 30 patients were examined twice (for a total of 180 patients). Least significant change (LSC) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) were calculated. The remaining 198 patients underwent three scans of the lumbar spine (n = 92) or of the right femur (n = 106), one for each scan mode. The student t test and Bland-Altman analysis used were. Scan times were recorded and radiation dose was estimated using the ICRP60 method. Results: Intra-scan mode reproducibility was 98-99 %, corresponding to an LSC of 1.49-2.08 %. The SDD was 0.018-0.023 g/cm2 (lumbar spine) and 0.017-0.019 g/cm2 (right femur). All comparisons among scan modes were statistically significant (p <0.001) but lower than SDDs, i.e. not clinically relevant. Considering lumbar spine and the right femur, scan times were 50 and 38 s for fast array, 98 and 74 s for array, and 195 and 148 s for high definition, respectively; radiation doses were 6.7 and 4.7 μSv for fast array, and 13.3 and 9.3 μSv for both array and high definition, respectively. Conclusion: Since all BMD differences were lower than the SSDs, the three scan modes can be considered interchangeable. As a consequence, although the absolute reduction in time and radiation dose is relatively low, when BMD measurement is the aim of DXA, fast array can be generally preferred.

KW - Bone mineral density

KW - Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

KW - Reproducibility

KW - Scan modes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898027700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898027700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11547-013-0342-3

DO - 10.1007/s11547-013-0342-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 24297585

AN - SCOPUS:84898027700

VL - 119

SP - 257

EP - 260

JO - Radiologia Medica

JF - Radiologia Medica

SN - 0033-8362

IS - 4

ER -