Incidence of frailty: A systematic review of scientific literature from a public health perspective

Work Package 5 of the Joint Action ADVANTAGE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction. Because of the dynamic nature of frailty, prospective epidemiological data are essential to calibrate an adequate public health response. Methods. A systematic review of literature on frailty incidence was conducted within the European Joint Action ADVANTAGE. Results. Of the 6 studies included, only 3 were specifically aimed at estimating frailty incidence, and only 2 provided disaggregated results by at least gender. The mean followup length (1-22.2 years; median 5.1), sample size (74-6306 individuals), and age of participants (≥ 30-65) varied greatly across studies. The adoption of incidence proportions rather than rates further limited comparability of results. After removing one outlier, incidence ranged from 5% (follow-up 22.2 years; age ≥ 30) to 13% (follow-up 1 year, age ≥ 55). Conclusions. Well-designed prospective studies of frailty are necessary. To facilitate comparison across studies and over time, incidence should be estimated in person-time rate. Analyses of factors associated with the development of frailty are needed to identify high-risk groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-245
Number of pages7
JournalAnnali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Public Health
Incidence
Sample Size
Statistical Factor Analysis
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Epidemiology
  • Frailty
  • Public health
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Incidence of frailty : A systematic review of scientific literature from a public health perspective. / Work Package 5 of the Joint Action ADVANTAGE.

In: Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Vol. 54, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 239-245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c6c177a11d1c4a2cb477f27cf4f2ce3a,
title = "Incidence of frailty: A systematic review of scientific literature from a public health perspective",
abstract = "Introduction. Because of the dynamic nature of frailty, prospective epidemiological data are essential to calibrate an adequate public health response. Methods. A systematic review of literature on frailty incidence was conducted within the European Joint Action ADVANTAGE. Results. Of the 6 studies included, only 3 were specifically aimed at estimating frailty incidence, and only 2 provided disaggregated results by at least gender. The mean followup length (1-22.2 years; median 5.1), sample size (74-6306 individuals), and age of participants (≥ 30-65) varied greatly across studies. The adoption of incidence proportions rather than rates further limited comparability of results. After removing one outlier, incidence ranged from 5{\%} (follow-up 22.2 years; age ≥ 30) to 13{\%} (follow-up 1 year, age ≥ 55). Conclusions. Well-designed prospective studies of frailty are necessary. To facilitate comparison across studies and over time, incidence should be estimated in person-time rate. Analyses of factors associated with the development of frailty are needed to identify high-risk groups.",
keywords = "Aging, Epidemiology, Frailty, Public health, Systematic review",
author = "{Work Package 5 of the Joint Action ADVANTAGE} and Lucia Galluzzo and R{\'o}n{\'a}n O'Caoimh and {\'A}ngel Rodr{\'i}guez-Laso and Nathalie Beltzer and Ranhoff, {Anette Hylen} and {Van Der Heyden}, Johan and Maria Lamprini-Koula and Marius Ciutan and Luz L{\'o}pez-Samaniego and Aaron Liew",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4415/ANN_18_03_11",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "239--245",
journal = "Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita",
issn = "0021-2571",
publisher = "Istituto Superiore di Sanita",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incidence of frailty

T2 - A systematic review of scientific literature from a public health perspective

AU - Work Package 5 of the Joint Action ADVANTAGE

AU - Galluzzo, Lucia

AU - O'Caoimh, Rónán

AU - Rodríguez-Laso, Ángel

AU - Beltzer, Nathalie

AU - Ranhoff, Anette Hylen

AU - Van Der Heyden, Johan

AU - Lamprini-Koula, Maria

AU - Ciutan, Marius

AU - López-Samaniego, Luz

AU - Liew, Aaron

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Introduction. Because of the dynamic nature of frailty, prospective epidemiological data are essential to calibrate an adequate public health response. Methods. A systematic review of literature on frailty incidence was conducted within the European Joint Action ADVANTAGE. Results. Of the 6 studies included, only 3 were specifically aimed at estimating frailty incidence, and only 2 provided disaggregated results by at least gender. The mean followup length (1-22.2 years; median 5.1), sample size (74-6306 individuals), and age of participants (≥ 30-65) varied greatly across studies. The adoption of incidence proportions rather than rates further limited comparability of results. After removing one outlier, incidence ranged from 5% (follow-up 22.2 years; age ≥ 30) to 13% (follow-up 1 year, age ≥ 55). Conclusions. Well-designed prospective studies of frailty are necessary. To facilitate comparison across studies and over time, incidence should be estimated in person-time rate. Analyses of factors associated with the development of frailty are needed to identify high-risk groups.

AB - Introduction. Because of the dynamic nature of frailty, prospective epidemiological data are essential to calibrate an adequate public health response. Methods. A systematic review of literature on frailty incidence was conducted within the European Joint Action ADVANTAGE. Results. Of the 6 studies included, only 3 were specifically aimed at estimating frailty incidence, and only 2 provided disaggregated results by at least gender. The mean followup length (1-22.2 years; median 5.1), sample size (74-6306 individuals), and age of participants (≥ 30-65) varied greatly across studies. The adoption of incidence proportions rather than rates further limited comparability of results. After removing one outlier, incidence ranged from 5% (follow-up 22.2 years; age ≥ 30) to 13% (follow-up 1 year, age ≥ 55). Conclusions. Well-designed prospective studies of frailty are necessary. To facilitate comparison across studies and over time, incidence should be estimated in person-time rate. Analyses of factors associated with the development of frailty are needed to identify high-risk groups.

KW - Aging

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Frailty

KW - Public health

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054099713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054099713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4415/ANN_18_03_11

DO - 10.4415/ANN_18_03_11

M3 - Article

C2 - 30284551

AN - SCOPUS:85054099713

VL - 54

SP - 239

EP - 245

JO - Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita

JF - Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita

SN - 0021-2571

IS - 3

ER -