Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective

Thomas Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The proposed introduction of gaming disorder (GD) in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) has led to a lively debate over the past year. Besides the broad support for the decision in the academic press, a recent publication by van Rooij et al. (2018) repeated the criticism raised against the inclusion of GD in ICD-11 by Aarseth et al. (2017). We argue that this group of researchers fails to recognize the clinical and public health considerations, which support the WHO perspective. It is important to recognize a range of biases that may influence this debate; in particular, the gaming industry may wish to diminish its responsibility by claiming that GD is not a public health problem, a position which maybe supported by arguments from scholars based in media psychology, computer games research, communication science, and related disciplines. However, just as with any other disease or disorder in the ICD-11, the decision whether or not to include GD is based on clinical evidence and public health needs. Therefore, we reiterate our conclusion that including GD reflects the essence of the ICD and will facilitate treatment and prevention for those who need it.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)556-561
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Behavioral Addictions
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Public Health
Video Games
International Classification of Diseases
Industry
Communication
Research Personnel
Psychology
Research

Cite this

Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11 : The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective. / Thomas Chung.

In: Journal of Behavioral Addictions, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 556-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6545a9cc98a41f2bc5c0b9d5873bbb8,
title = "Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective",
abstract = "The proposed introduction of gaming disorder (GD) in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) has led to a lively debate over the past year. Besides the broad support for the decision in the academic press, a recent publication by van Rooij et al. (2018) repeated the criticism raised against the inclusion of GD in ICD-11 by Aarseth et al. (2017). We argue that this group of researchers fails to recognize the clinical and public health considerations, which support the WHO perspective. It is important to recognize a range of biases that may influence this debate; in particular, the gaming industry may wish to diminish its responsibility by claiming that GD is not a public health problem, a position which maybe supported by arguments from scholars based in media psychology, computer games research, communication science, and related disciplines. However, just as with any other disease or disorder in the ICD-11, the decision whether or not to include GD is based on clinical evidence and public health needs. Therefore, we reiterate our conclusion that including GD reflects the essence of the ICD and will facilitate treatment and prevention for those who need it.",
author = "{Thomas Chung} and Hans-J{\"u}rgen Rumpf and Sophia Achab and Jo{\"e}l Billieux and Henrietta Bowden-Jones and Natacha Carragher and Zsolt Demetrovics and Susumu Higuchi and King, {Daniel L} and Karl Mann and Marc Potenza and Saunders, {John B} and Max Abbott and Atul Ambekar and Aricak, {Osman Tolga} and Sawitri Assanangkornchai and Norharlina Bahar and Guilherme Borges and Matthias Brand and Chan, {Elda Mei-Lo} and Thomas Chung and Jeff Derevensky and Kashef, {Ahmad El} and Michael Farrell and Fineberg, {Naomi A} and Claudia Gandin and Gentile, {Douglas A} and Griffiths, {Mark D} and Goudriaan, {Anna E} and Marie Grall-Bronnec and Wei Hao and Hodgins, {David C} and Patrick Ip and Orsolya Kir{\'a}ly and Lee, {Hae Kook} and Daria Kuss and Lemmens, {Jeroen S} and Jiang Long and Olatz Lopez-Fernandez and Satoko Mihara and Petry, {Nancy M} and Pontes, {Halley M} and Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar and Florian Rehbein and J{\"u}rgen Rehm and Emanuele Scafato and Manoi Sharma and Daniel Spritzer and Stein, {Dan J} and Philip Tam and Aviv Weinstein",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1556/2006.7.2018.59",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "556--561",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Addictions",
issn = "2062-5871",
publisher = "Akademiai Kiado",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11

T2 - The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective

AU - Thomas Chung

AU - Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen

AU - Achab, Sophia

AU - Billieux, Joël

AU - Bowden-Jones, Henrietta

AU - Carragher, Natacha

AU - Demetrovics, Zsolt

AU - Higuchi, Susumu

AU - King, Daniel L

AU - Mann, Karl

AU - Potenza, Marc

AU - Saunders, John B

AU - Abbott, Max

AU - Ambekar, Atul

AU - Aricak, Osman Tolga

AU - Assanangkornchai, Sawitri

AU - Bahar, Norharlina

AU - Borges, Guilherme

AU - Brand, Matthias

AU - Chan, Elda Mei-Lo

AU - Chung, Thomas

AU - Derevensky, Jeff

AU - Kashef, Ahmad El

AU - Farrell, Michael

AU - Fineberg, Naomi A

AU - Gandin, Claudia

AU - Gentile, Douglas A

AU - Griffiths, Mark D

AU - Goudriaan, Anna E

AU - Grall-Bronnec, Marie

AU - Hao, Wei

AU - Hodgins, David C

AU - Ip, Patrick

AU - Király, Orsolya

AU - Lee, Hae Kook

AU - Kuss, Daria

AU - Lemmens, Jeroen S

AU - Long, Jiang

AU - Lopez-Fernandez, Olatz

AU - Mihara, Satoko

AU - Petry, Nancy M

AU - Pontes, Halley M

AU - Rahimi-Movaghar, Afarin

AU - Rehbein, Florian

AU - Rehm, Jürgen

AU - Scafato, Emanuele

AU - Sharma, Manoi

AU - Spritzer, Daniel

AU - Stein, Dan J

AU - Tam, Philip

AU - Weinstein, Aviv

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - The proposed introduction of gaming disorder (GD) in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) has led to a lively debate over the past year. Besides the broad support for the decision in the academic press, a recent publication by van Rooij et al. (2018) repeated the criticism raised against the inclusion of GD in ICD-11 by Aarseth et al. (2017). We argue that this group of researchers fails to recognize the clinical and public health considerations, which support the WHO perspective. It is important to recognize a range of biases that may influence this debate; in particular, the gaming industry may wish to diminish its responsibility by claiming that GD is not a public health problem, a position which maybe supported by arguments from scholars based in media psychology, computer games research, communication science, and related disciplines. However, just as with any other disease or disorder in the ICD-11, the decision whether or not to include GD is based on clinical evidence and public health needs. Therefore, we reiterate our conclusion that including GD reflects the essence of the ICD and will facilitate treatment and prevention for those who need it.

AB - The proposed introduction of gaming disorder (GD) in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) has led to a lively debate over the past year. Besides the broad support for the decision in the academic press, a recent publication by van Rooij et al. (2018) repeated the criticism raised against the inclusion of GD in ICD-11 by Aarseth et al. (2017). We argue that this group of researchers fails to recognize the clinical and public health considerations, which support the WHO perspective. It is important to recognize a range of biases that may influence this debate; in particular, the gaming industry may wish to diminish its responsibility by claiming that GD is not a public health problem, a position which maybe supported by arguments from scholars based in media psychology, computer games research, communication science, and related disciplines. However, just as with any other disease or disorder in the ICD-11, the decision whether or not to include GD is based on clinical evidence and public health needs. Therefore, we reiterate our conclusion that including GD reflects the essence of the ICD and will facilitate treatment and prevention for those who need it.

U2 - 10.1556/2006.7.2018.59

DO - 10.1556/2006.7.2018.59

M3 - Article

C2 - 30010410

VL - 7

SP - 556

EP - 561

JO - Journal of Behavioral Addictions

JF - Journal of Behavioral Addictions

SN - 2062-5871

IS - 3

ER -