Independent adaptation mechanisms for numerosity and size perception provide evidence against a common sense of magnitude

Giovanni Anobile, David C. Burr, Marika Iaia, Chiara V. Marinelli, Paola Angelelli, Marco Turi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How numerical quantity is processed is a central issue for cognition. On the one hand the “number sense theory” claims that numerosity is perceived directly, and may represent an early precursor for acquisition of mathematical skills. On the other, the “theory of magnitude” notes that numerosity correlates with many continuous properties such as size and density, and may therefore not exist as an independent feature, but be part of a more general system of magnitude. In this study we examined interactions in sensitivity between numerosity and size perception. In a group of children, we measured psychophysically two sensory parameters: perceptual adaptation and discrimination thresholds for both size and numerosity. Neither discrimination thresholds nor adaptation strength for numerosity and size correlated across participants. This clear lack of correlation (confirmed by Bayesian analyses) suggests that numerosity and size interference effects are unlikely to reflect a shared sensory representation. We suggest these small interference effects may rather result from top-down phenomena occurring at late decisional levels rather than a primary “sense of magnitude”.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13571
JournalScientific Reports
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

cognition
effect
parameter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Independent adaptation mechanisms for numerosity and size perception provide evidence against a common sense of magnitude. / Anobile, Giovanni; Burr, David C.; Iaia, Marika; Marinelli, Chiara V.; Angelelli, Paola; Turi, Marco.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, No. 1, 13571, 01.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anobile, Giovanni ; Burr, David C. ; Iaia, Marika ; Marinelli, Chiara V. ; Angelelli, Paola ; Turi, Marco. / Independent adaptation mechanisms for numerosity and size perception provide evidence against a common sense of magnitude. In: Scientific Reports. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.
@article{b469cf8e414d4607bf921ec39ec2d97c,
title = "Independent adaptation mechanisms for numerosity and size perception provide evidence against a common sense of magnitude",
abstract = "How numerical quantity is processed is a central issue for cognition. On the one hand the “number sense theory” claims that numerosity is perceived directly, and may represent an early precursor for acquisition of mathematical skills. On the other, the “theory of magnitude” notes that numerosity correlates with many continuous properties such as size and density, and may therefore not exist as an independent feature, but be part of a more general system of magnitude. In this study we examined interactions in sensitivity between numerosity and size perception. In a group of children, we measured psychophysically two sensory parameters: perceptual adaptation and discrimination thresholds for both size and numerosity. Neither discrimination thresholds nor adaptation strength for numerosity and size correlated across participants. This clear lack of correlation (confirmed by Bayesian analyses) suggests that numerosity and size interference effects are unlikely to reflect a shared sensory representation. We suggest these small interference effects may rather result from top-down phenomena occurring at late decisional levels rather than a primary “sense of magnitude”.",
author = "Giovanni Anobile and Burr, {David C.} and Marika Iaia and Marinelli, {Chiara V.} and Paola Angelelli and Marco Turi",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-018-31893-6",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Independent adaptation mechanisms for numerosity and size perception provide evidence against a common sense of magnitude

AU - Anobile, Giovanni

AU - Burr, David C.

AU - Iaia, Marika

AU - Marinelli, Chiara V.

AU - Angelelli, Paola

AU - Turi, Marco

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - How numerical quantity is processed is a central issue for cognition. On the one hand the “number sense theory” claims that numerosity is perceived directly, and may represent an early precursor for acquisition of mathematical skills. On the other, the “theory of magnitude” notes that numerosity correlates with many continuous properties such as size and density, and may therefore not exist as an independent feature, but be part of a more general system of magnitude. In this study we examined interactions in sensitivity between numerosity and size perception. In a group of children, we measured psychophysically two sensory parameters: perceptual adaptation and discrimination thresholds for both size and numerosity. Neither discrimination thresholds nor adaptation strength for numerosity and size correlated across participants. This clear lack of correlation (confirmed by Bayesian analyses) suggests that numerosity and size interference effects are unlikely to reflect a shared sensory representation. We suggest these small interference effects may rather result from top-down phenomena occurring at late decisional levels rather than a primary “sense of magnitude”.

AB - How numerical quantity is processed is a central issue for cognition. On the one hand the “number sense theory” claims that numerosity is perceived directly, and may represent an early precursor for acquisition of mathematical skills. On the other, the “theory of magnitude” notes that numerosity correlates with many continuous properties such as size and density, and may therefore not exist as an independent feature, but be part of a more general system of magnitude. In this study we examined interactions in sensitivity between numerosity and size perception. In a group of children, we measured psychophysically two sensory parameters: perceptual adaptation and discrimination thresholds for both size and numerosity. Neither discrimination thresholds nor adaptation strength for numerosity and size correlated across participants. This clear lack of correlation (confirmed by Bayesian analyses) suggests that numerosity and size interference effects are unlikely to reflect a shared sensory representation. We suggest these small interference effects may rather result from top-down phenomena occurring at late decisional levels rather than a primary “sense of magnitude”.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053272788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053272788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-31893-6

DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-31893-6

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 13571

ER -