Indexes of adiposity and body composition in the prediction of metabolic syndrome in obese children and adolescents: Which is the best?

Giorgio Radetti, Antonio Fanolla, Graziano Grugni, Fiorenzo Lupi, Alessandro Sartorio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and aim: There is no agreement about which index of adiposity and/or body composition is the most accurate in identifying the metabolic syndrome (METS). The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of the different indexes in order to recognize the most reliable. Methods and results: We evaluated 1332 obese children and adolescents (778 females and 554 males), aged 14.4 ± 1.8 yrs, Body Mass Index (BMI) standard deviation scores (SDS) 2.99 ± 0.55, followed at the Istituto Auxologico Italiano, a tertiary center for childhood obesity. For each subject the following indexes were assessed: BMI, BMI SDS, Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI), Fat Mass Index (FMI), Tri-Ponderal Mass Index (TMI), Waist-to-Height ratio (WtHR) and a new one, the Body Mass Fat Index (BMFI), which normalizes the BMI for percentage of body fat and the waist circumference. Thereafter we calculated for each index a threshold value for age and sex, in order to compare their accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in identifying the METS. There was a good correlation among indexes (p < 0.0001 for all). However, when the area under the curve (AUC) was compared, some of them, in particular the BMFI and the BMI, performed better than the other ones, although the differences were small. Conclusions: BMI, which neither considers body composition nor fat distribution, performs as good as other indexes, and should therefore be the preferred one, also because of the easiness of its calculation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1189-1196
Number of pages8
JournalNutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Adiposity
Body Composition
Body Mass Index
Fats
Pediatric Obesity
Waist Circumference
Area Under Curve
Adipose Tissue
Weights and Measures
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Adiposity index
  • Adolescents
  • BMI
  • Children
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Obesity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Indexes of adiposity and body composition in the prediction of metabolic syndrome in obese children and adolescents : Which is the best? / Radetti, Giorgio; Fanolla, Antonio; Grugni, Graziano; Lupi, Fiorenzo; Sartorio, Alessandro.

In: Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol. 29, No. 11, 11.2019, p. 1189-1196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{afe3287c77de4556ac20b509b34fd92b,
title = "Indexes of adiposity and body composition in the prediction of metabolic syndrome in obese children and adolescents: Which is the best?",
abstract = "Background and aim: There is no agreement about which index of adiposity and/or body composition is the most accurate in identifying the metabolic syndrome (METS). The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of the different indexes in order to recognize the most reliable. Methods and results: We evaluated 1332 obese children and adolescents (778 females and 554 males), aged 14.4 ± 1.8 yrs, Body Mass Index (BMI) standard deviation scores (SDS) 2.99 ± 0.55, followed at the Istituto Auxologico Italiano, a tertiary center for childhood obesity. For each subject the following indexes were assessed: BMI, BMI SDS, Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI), Fat Mass Index (FMI), Tri-Ponderal Mass Index (TMI), Waist-to-Height ratio (WtHR) and a new one, the Body Mass Fat Index (BMFI), which normalizes the BMI for percentage of body fat and the waist circumference. Thereafter we calculated for each index a threshold value for age and sex, in order to compare their accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in identifying the METS. There was a good correlation among indexes (p < 0.0001 for all). However, when the area under the curve (AUC) was compared, some of them, in particular the BMFI and the BMI, performed better than the other ones, although the differences were small. Conclusions: BMI, which neither considers body composition nor fat distribution, performs as good as other indexes, and should therefore be the preferred one, also because of the easiness of its calculation.",
keywords = "Adiposity index, Adolescents, BMI, Children, Metabolic syndrome, Obesity",
author = "Giorgio Radetti and Antonio Fanolla and Graziano Grugni and Fiorenzo Lupi and Alessandro Sartorio",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.numecd.2019.06.011",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1189--1196",
journal = "Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases",
issn = "0939-4753",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indexes of adiposity and body composition in the prediction of metabolic syndrome in obese children and adolescents

T2 - Which is the best?

AU - Radetti, Giorgio

AU - Fanolla, Antonio

AU - Grugni, Graziano

AU - Lupi, Fiorenzo

AU - Sartorio, Alessandro

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - Background and aim: There is no agreement about which index of adiposity and/or body composition is the most accurate in identifying the metabolic syndrome (METS). The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of the different indexes in order to recognize the most reliable. Methods and results: We evaluated 1332 obese children and adolescents (778 females and 554 males), aged 14.4 ± 1.8 yrs, Body Mass Index (BMI) standard deviation scores (SDS) 2.99 ± 0.55, followed at the Istituto Auxologico Italiano, a tertiary center for childhood obesity. For each subject the following indexes were assessed: BMI, BMI SDS, Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI), Fat Mass Index (FMI), Tri-Ponderal Mass Index (TMI), Waist-to-Height ratio (WtHR) and a new one, the Body Mass Fat Index (BMFI), which normalizes the BMI for percentage of body fat and the waist circumference. Thereafter we calculated for each index a threshold value for age and sex, in order to compare their accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in identifying the METS. There was a good correlation among indexes (p < 0.0001 for all). However, when the area under the curve (AUC) was compared, some of them, in particular the BMFI and the BMI, performed better than the other ones, although the differences were small. Conclusions: BMI, which neither considers body composition nor fat distribution, performs as good as other indexes, and should therefore be the preferred one, also because of the easiness of its calculation.

AB - Background and aim: There is no agreement about which index of adiposity and/or body composition is the most accurate in identifying the metabolic syndrome (METS). The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of the different indexes in order to recognize the most reliable. Methods and results: We evaluated 1332 obese children and adolescents (778 females and 554 males), aged 14.4 ± 1.8 yrs, Body Mass Index (BMI) standard deviation scores (SDS) 2.99 ± 0.55, followed at the Istituto Auxologico Italiano, a tertiary center for childhood obesity. For each subject the following indexes were assessed: BMI, BMI SDS, Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI), Fat Mass Index (FMI), Tri-Ponderal Mass Index (TMI), Waist-to-Height ratio (WtHR) and a new one, the Body Mass Fat Index (BMFI), which normalizes the BMI for percentage of body fat and the waist circumference. Thereafter we calculated for each index a threshold value for age and sex, in order to compare their accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in identifying the METS. There was a good correlation among indexes (p < 0.0001 for all). However, when the area under the curve (AUC) was compared, some of them, in particular the BMFI and the BMI, performed better than the other ones, although the differences were small. Conclusions: BMI, which neither considers body composition nor fat distribution, performs as good as other indexes, and should therefore be the preferred one, also because of the easiness of its calculation.

KW - Adiposity index

KW - Adolescents

KW - BMI

KW - Children

KW - Metabolic syndrome

KW - Obesity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073668813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073668813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.06.011

DO - 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.06.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 31378631

AN - SCOPUS:85073668813

VL - 29

SP - 1189

EP - 1196

JO - Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases

JF - Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases

SN - 0939-4753

IS - 11

ER -