Indicators of integration of oncology and palliative care programs: An international consensus

David Hui, S. Bansal, F. Strasser, T. Morita, A. Caraceni, M. Davis, N. Cherny, S. Kaasa, D. Currow, A. Abernethy, C. Nekolaichuk, E. Bruera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recently, the concept of integrating oncology and palliative care has gained wide professional and scientific support; however, a global consensus on what constitutes integration is unavailable. We conducted a Delphi Survey to develop a consensus list of indicators on integration of specialty palliative care and oncology programs for advanced cancer patients in hospitals with ≥100 beds. Methods: International experts on integration rated a list of indicators on integration over three iterative rounds under five categories: clinical structure, processes, outcomes, education, and research. Consensus was defined a priori by an agreement of ≥70%. Major criteria (i.e. most relevant and important indicators) were subsequently identified. Results: Among 47 experts surveyed, 46 (98%), 45 (96%), and 45 (96%) responded over the three rounds. Nineteen (40%) were female, 24 (51%) were from North America, and 14 (30%) were from Europe. Sixteen (34%), 7 (15%), and 25 (53%) practiced palliative care, oncology, and both specialties, respectively. After three rounds of deliberation, the panelists reached consensus on 13 major and 30 minor indicators. Major indicators included two related to structure (consensus 95%-98%), four on processes (88%-98%), three on outcomes (88%-91%), and four on education (93%-100%). The major indicators were considered to be clearly stated (9.8/10), objective (9.4/10), amenable to accurate coding (9.5/10), and applicable to their own countries (9.4/10). Conclusions: Our international experts reached broad consensus on a list of indicators of integration, which may be used to identify centers with a high level of integration, and facilitate benchmarking, quality improvement, and research.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbermdv269
Pages (from-to)1953-1959
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Education
Benchmarking
North America
Quality Improvement
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Access
  • Health systems
  • Indicators
  • Integration
  • Neoplasms
  • Palliative care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Hematology

Cite this

Hui, D., Bansal, S., Strasser, F., Morita, T., Caraceni, A., Davis, M., ... Bruera, E. (2015). Indicators of integration of oncology and palliative care programs: An international consensus. Annals of Oncology, 26(9), 1953-1959. [mdv269]. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv269

Indicators of integration of oncology and palliative care programs : An international consensus. / Hui, David; Bansal, S.; Strasser, F.; Morita, T.; Caraceni, A.; Davis, M.; Cherny, N.; Kaasa, S.; Currow, D.; Abernethy, A.; Nekolaichuk, C.; Bruera, E.

In: Annals of Oncology, Vol. 26, No. 9, mdv269, 01.09.2015, p. 1953-1959.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hui, D, Bansal, S, Strasser, F, Morita, T, Caraceni, A, Davis, M, Cherny, N, Kaasa, S, Currow, D, Abernethy, A, Nekolaichuk, C & Bruera, E 2015, 'Indicators of integration of oncology and palliative care programs: An international consensus', Annals of Oncology, vol. 26, no. 9, mdv269, pp. 1953-1959. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv269
Hui, David ; Bansal, S. ; Strasser, F. ; Morita, T. ; Caraceni, A. ; Davis, M. ; Cherny, N. ; Kaasa, S. ; Currow, D. ; Abernethy, A. ; Nekolaichuk, C. ; Bruera, E. / Indicators of integration of oncology and palliative care programs : An international consensus. In: Annals of Oncology. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 9. pp. 1953-1959.
@article{1ab7febf9851494f85c45e9089f25f62,
title = "Indicators of integration of oncology and palliative care programs: An international consensus",
abstract = "Background: Recently, the concept of integrating oncology and palliative care has gained wide professional and scientific support; however, a global consensus on what constitutes integration is unavailable. We conducted a Delphi Survey to develop a consensus list of indicators on integration of specialty palliative care and oncology programs for advanced cancer patients in hospitals with ≥100 beds. Methods: International experts on integration rated a list of indicators on integration over three iterative rounds under five categories: clinical structure, processes, outcomes, education, and research. Consensus was defined a priori by an agreement of ≥70{\%}. Major criteria (i.e. most relevant and important indicators) were subsequently identified. Results: Among 47 experts surveyed, 46 (98{\%}), 45 (96{\%}), and 45 (96{\%}) responded over the three rounds. Nineteen (40{\%}) were female, 24 (51{\%}) were from North America, and 14 (30{\%}) were from Europe. Sixteen (34{\%}), 7 (15{\%}), and 25 (53{\%}) practiced palliative care, oncology, and both specialties, respectively. After three rounds of deliberation, the panelists reached consensus on 13 major and 30 minor indicators. Major indicators included two related to structure (consensus 95{\%}-98{\%}), four on processes (88{\%}-98{\%}), three on outcomes (88{\%}-91{\%}), and four on education (93{\%}-100{\%}). The major indicators were considered to be clearly stated (9.8/10), objective (9.4/10), amenable to accurate coding (9.5/10), and applicable to their own countries (9.4/10). Conclusions: Our international experts reached broad consensus on a list of indicators of integration, which may be used to identify centers with a high level of integration, and facilitate benchmarking, quality improvement, and research.",
keywords = "Access, Health systems, Indicators, Integration, Neoplasms, Palliative care",
author = "David Hui and S. Bansal and F. Strasser and T. Morita and A. Caraceni and M. Davis and N. Cherny and S. Kaasa and D. Currow and A. Abernethy and C. Nekolaichuk and E. Bruera",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/annonc/mdv269",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1953--1959",
journal = "Annals of Oncology",
issn = "0923-7534",
publisher = "NLM (Medline)",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indicators of integration of oncology and palliative care programs

T2 - An international consensus

AU - Hui, David

AU - Bansal, S.

AU - Strasser, F.

AU - Morita, T.

AU - Caraceni, A.

AU - Davis, M.

AU - Cherny, N.

AU - Kaasa, S.

AU - Currow, D.

AU - Abernethy, A.

AU - Nekolaichuk, C.

AU - Bruera, E.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Background: Recently, the concept of integrating oncology and palliative care has gained wide professional and scientific support; however, a global consensus on what constitutes integration is unavailable. We conducted a Delphi Survey to develop a consensus list of indicators on integration of specialty palliative care and oncology programs for advanced cancer patients in hospitals with ≥100 beds. Methods: International experts on integration rated a list of indicators on integration over three iterative rounds under five categories: clinical structure, processes, outcomes, education, and research. Consensus was defined a priori by an agreement of ≥70%. Major criteria (i.e. most relevant and important indicators) were subsequently identified. Results: Among 47 experts surveyed, 46 (98%), 45 (96%), and 45 (96%) responded over the three rounds. Nineteen (40%) were female, 24 (51%) were from North America, and 14 (30%) were from Europe. Sixteen (34%), 7 (15%), and 25 (53%) practiced palliative care, oncology, and both specialties, respectively. After three rounds of deliberation, the panelists reached consensus on 13 major and 30 minor indicators. Major indicators included two related to structure (consensus 95%-98%), four on processes (88%-98%), three on outcomes (88%-91%), and four on education (93%-100%). The major indicators were considered to be clearly stated (9.8/10), objective (9.4/10), amenable to accurate coding (9.5/10), and applicable to their own countries (9.4/10). Conclusions: Our international experts reached broad consensus on a list of indicators of integration, which may be used to identify centers with a high level of integration, and facilitate benchmarking, quality improvement, and research.

AB - Background: Recently, the concept of integrating oncology and palliative care has gained wide professional and scientific support; however, a global consensus on what constitutes integration is unavailable. We conducted a Delphi Survey to develop a consensus list of indicators on integration of specialty palliative care and oncology programs for advanced cancer patients in hospitals with ≥100 beds. Methods: International experts on integration rated a list of indicators on integration over three iterative rounds under five categories: clinical structure, processes, outcomes, education, and research. Consensus was defined a priori by an agreement of ≥70%. Major criteria (i.e. most relevant and important indicators) were subsequently identified. Results: Among 47 experts surveyed, 46 (98%), 45 (96%), and 45 (96%) responded over the three rounds. Nineteen (40%) were female, 24 (51%) were from North America, and 14 (30%) were from Europe. Sixteen (34%), 7 (15%), and 25 (53%) practiced palliative care, oncology, and both specialties, respectively. After three rounds of deliberation, the panelists reached consensus on 13 major and 30 minor indicators. Major indicators included two related to structure (consensus 95%-98%), four on processes (88%-98%), three on outcomes (88%-91%), and four on education (93%-100%). The major indicators were considered to be clearly stated (9.8/10), objective (9.4/10), amenable to accurate coding (9.5/10), and applicable to their own countries (9.4/10). Conclusions: Our international experts reached broad consensus on a list of indicators of integration, which may be used to identify centers with a high level of integration, and facilitate benchmarking, quality improvement, and research.

KW - Access

KW - Health systems

KW - Indicators

KW - Integration

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Palliative care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941656659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941656659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/annonc/mdv269

DO - 10.1093/annonc/mdv269

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84941656659

VL - 26

SP - 1953

EP - 1959

JO - Annals of Oncology

JF - Annals of Oncology

SN - 0923-7534

IS - 9

M1 - mdv269

ER -