Infections and urolithiasis: Current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy

Giampaolo Zanetti, Stefano Paparella, Alberto Trinchieri, Domenico Prezioso, Francesco Rocco, Kurt G. Naber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Urinary tract infections and urosepsis are complications which can precede or follow a kidney stone treatment. Often the stones themselves are the source of infection, whether they are infection stones or not. Systemic infections are difficult to foresee, and neither a pre-operative negative urine culture nor an antibiotic prophylaxis avoid infectious complications for certain. The primary predictive risk factors of urosepsis are: patient conditions, urinary tract infection or a history of recurrent infections, characteristics of the stone, and anatomy of the urinary tract. Infection stones are still a matter of debate, concerning both the aetiology of the disease and its treatment. Positive cultures are not only found with struvite stones, but also with apatite and calcium oxalate stones. Currently, a long-term antibiotic therapy is advised in patients affected by infection stones. Antibiotic therapy should prevent not only septic complications but also recurrence or re-growth of stones after treatment. Different antibiotic modalities are recommended, sometimes together with urease inhibitors. Mid-stream urine culture is the easiest available pre-treatment parameter notwithstanding its poor predictive value. In case of suspected or proven urinary infection, an appropriate antibiotic therapy should always be administered prior to surgical procedure. There is, however, controversy regarding the antibiotic use, its role, expediency, and duration of prophylaxis in relation to the various surgical procedures, and the way infectious complications are considered and classified. When antibiotic prophylaxis is considered, its duration should be clearly established prior to surgery; duration may vary depending on the type of surgery or the type of antibiotic. Furthermore, prophylaxis should be administered only for a limited amount of time. In infection stones, in immuno-compromised patients or in patients with anatomical anomalies or diabetes, the risk of post-treatment infection and sepsis is higher. Hence there is agreement on the need for prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. The most recent literature has shown excellent results with fluoroquinolones both in prophylaxis and therapy, concerning post-operative infection control after percutaneous as well as ureteroscopic removal of stones. No agreement has yet been reached on antibiotic prophylaxis modalities prior to percutaneous or ureteroscopic removal and its usefulness for SWL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-12
Number of pages8
JournalArchivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia
Volume80
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Urolithiasis
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Infection
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Therapeutics
Urinary Tract Infections
Urine
Apatites
Calcium Oxalate
Urinary Calculi
Kidney Calculi
Urease
Fluoroquinolones
Infection Control
Anatomy
Sepsis
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Antibiotic prophylaxis
  • Antibiotic therapy
  • Infection
  • Urolithiasis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Urology

Cite this

Zanetti, G., Paparella, S., Trinchieri, A., Prezioso, D., Rocco, F., & Naber, K. G. (2008). Infections and urolithiasis: Current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia, 80(1), 5-12.

Infections and urolithiasis : Current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. / Zanetti, Giampaolo; Paparella, Stefano; Trinchieri, Alberto; Prezioso, Domenico; Rocco, Francesco; Naber, Kurt G.

In: Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia, Vol. 80, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 5-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zanetti, G, Paparella, S, Trinchieri, A, Prezioso, D, Rocco, F & Naber, KG 2008, 'Infections and urolithiasis: Current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy', Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 5-12.
Zanetti G, Paparella S, Trinchieri A, Prezioso D, Rocco F, Naber KG. Infections and urolithiasis: Current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia. 2008 Mar;80(1):5-12.
Zanetti, Giampaolo ; Paparella, Stefano ; Trinchieri, Alberto ; Prezioso, Domenico ; Rocco, Francesco ; Naber, Kurt G. / Infections and urolithiasis : Current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. In: Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia. 2008 ; Vol. 80, No. 1. pp. 5-12.
@article{d2a6066f65f14234a31ad94a03e256e7,
title = "Infections and urolithiasis: Current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy",
abstract = "Urinary tract infections and urosepsis are complications which can precede or follow a kidney stone treatment. Often the stones themselves are the source of infection, whether they are infection stones or not. Systemic infections are difficult to foresee, and neither a pre-operative negative urine culture nor an antibiotic prophylaxis avoid infectious complications for certain. The primary predictive risk factors of urosepsis are: patient conditions, urinary tract infection or a history of recurrent infections, characteristics of the stone, and anatomy of the urinary tract. Infection stones are still a matter of debate, concerning both the aetiology of the disease and its treatment. Positive cultures are not only found with struvite stones, but also with apatite and calcium oxalate stones. Currently, a long-term antibiotic therapy is advised in patients affected by infection stones. Antibiotic therapy should prevent not only septic complications but also recurrence or re-growth of stones after treatment. Different antibiotic modalities are recommended, sometimes together with urease inhibitors. Mid-stream urine culture is the easiest available pre-treatment parameter notwithstanding its poor predictive value. In case of suspected or proven urinary infection, an appropriate antibiotic therapy should always be administered prior to surgical procedure. There is, however, controversy regarding the antibiotic use, its role, expediency, and duration of prophylaxis in relation to the various surgical procedures, and the way infectious complications are considered and classified. When antibiotic prophylaxis is considered, its duration should be clearly established prior to surgery; duration may vary depending on the type of surgery or the type of antibiotic. Furthermore, prophylaxis should be administered only for a limited amount of time. In infection stones, in immuno-compromised patients or in patients with anatomical anomalies or diabetes, the risk of post-treatment infection and sepsis is higher. Hence there is agreement on the need for prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. The most recent literature has shown excellent results with fluoroquinolones both in prophylaxis and therapy, concerning post-operative infection control after percutaneous as well as ureteroscopic removal of stones. No agreement has yet been reached on antibiotic prophylaxis modalities prior to percutaneous or ureteroscopic removal and its usefulness for SWL.",
keywords = "Antibiotic prophylaxis, Antibiotic therapy, Infection, Urolithiasis",
author = "Giampaolo Zanetti and Stefano Paparella and Alberto Trinchieri and Domenico Prezioso and Francesco Rocco and Naber, {Kurt G.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "5--12",
journal = "Archivio Italiano di Urologia Nefrologia Andrologia",
issn = "1120-8538",
publisher = "Edizioni Scripta Manent s.n.c.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infections and urolithiasis

T2 - Current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy

AU - Zanetti, Giampaolo

AU - Paparella, Stefano

AU - Trinchieri, Alberto

AU - Prezioso, Domenico

AU - Rocco, Francesco

AU - Naber, Kurt G.

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - Urinary tract infections and urosepsis are complications which can precede or follow a kidney stone treatment. Often the stones themselves are the source of infection, whether they are infection stones or not. Systemic infections are difficult to foresee, and neither a pre-operative negative urine culture nor an antibiotic prophylaxis avoid infectious complications for certain. The primary predictive risk factors of urosepsis are: patient conditions, urinary tract infection or a history of recurrent infections, characteristics of the stone, and anatomy of the urinary tract. Infection stones are still a matter of debate, concerning both the aetiology of the disease and its treatment. Positive cultures are not only found with struvite stones, but also with apatite and calcium oxalate stones. Currently, a long-term antibiotic therapy is advised in patients affected by infection stones. Antibiotic therapy should prevent not only septic complications but also recurrence or re-growth of stones after treatment. Different antibiotic modalities are recommended, sometimes together with urease inhibitors. Mid-stream urine culture is the easiest available pre-treatment parameter notwithstanding its poor predictive value. In case of suspected or proven urinary infection, an appropriate antibiotic therapy should always be administered prior to surgical procedure. There is, however, controversy regarding the antibiotic use, its role, expediency, and duration of prophylaxis in relation to the various surgical procedures, and the way infectious complications are considered and classified. When antibiotic prophylaxis is considered, its duration should be clearly established prior to surgery; duration may vary depending on the type of surgery or the type of antibiotic. Furthermore, prophylaxis should be administered only for a limited amount of time. In infection stones, in immuno-compromised patients or in patients with anatomical anomalies or diabetes, the risk of post-treatment infection and sepsis is higher. Hence there is agreement on the need for prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. The most recent literature has shown excellent results with fluoroquinolones both in prophylaxis and therapy, concerning post-operative infection control after percutaneous as well as ureteroscopic removal of stones. No agreement has yet been reached on antibiotic prophylaxis modalities prior to percutaneous or ureteroscopic removal and its usefulness for SWL.

AB - Urinary tract infections and urosepsis are complications which can precede or follow a kidney stone treatment. Often the stones themselves are the source of infection, whether they are infection stones or not. Systemic infections are difficult to foresee, and neither a pre-operative negative urine culture nor an antibiotic prophylaxis avoid infectious complications for certain. The primary predictive risk factors of urosepsis are: patient conditions, urinary tract infection or a history of recurrent infections, characteristics of the stone, and anatomy of the urinary tract. Infection stones are still a matter of debate, concerning both the aetiology of the disease and its treatment. Positive cultures are not only found with struvite stones, but also with apatite and calcium oxalate stones. Currently, a long-term antibiotic therapy is advised in patients affected by infection stones. Antibiotic therapy should prevent not only septic complications but also recurrence or re-growth of stones after treatment. Different antibiotic modalities are recommended, sometimes together with urease inhibitors. Mid-stream urine culture is the easiest available pre-treatment parameter notwithstanding its poor predictive value. In case of suspected or proven urinary infection, an appropriate antibiotic therapy should always be administered prior to surgical procedure. There is, however, controversy regarding the antibiotic use, its role, expediency, and duration of prophylaxis in relation to the various surgical procedures, and the way infectious complications are considered and classified. When antibiotic prophylaxis is considered, its duration should be clearly established prior to surgery; duration may vary depending on the type of surgery or the type of antibiotic. Furthermore, prophylaxis should be administered only for a limited amount of time. In infection stones, in immuno-compromised patients or in patients with anatomical anomalies or diabetes, the risk of post-treatment infection and sepsis is higher. Hence there is agreement on the need for prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. The most recent literature has shown excellent results with fluoroquinolones both in prophylaxis and therapy, concerning post-operative infection control after percutaneous as well as ureteroscopic removal of stones. No agreement has yet been reached on antibiotic prophylaxis modalities prior to percutaneous or ureteroscopic removal and its usefulness for SWL.

KW - Antibiotic prophylaxis

KW - Antibiotic therapy

KW - Infection

KW - Urolithiasis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42249089067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42249089067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18533618

AN - SCOPUS:42249089067

VL - 80

SP - 5

EP - 12

JO - Archivio Italiano di Urologia Nefrologia Andrologia

JF - Archivio Italiano di Urologia Nefrologia Andrologia

SN - 1120-8538

IS - 1

ER -