Influence of current strength on excitability and conduction of human atrium and atrioventricular node

Antonio Michelucci, Luigi Padeletti, Domenico Monizzi, Fabio Fantini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Summary: The influence of current strength on excitability and conduction of atrium and atrioventricular node was assessed in 25 patients using different current strengths (2,3,4,5,7, 10, 15 mA) and introducing extrastimuli (parasinusal zone) after the eighth paced complex of a basic drive (100 beats·min-1). Bipolar stimulation with the distal pole as cathode was performed so that (a) effective and functional refractoriness of atrium and atrioventricular node, and (b) the maximum value of atrial latency (interval between the extrastimulus and the beginning of atrial activity), intra-atrial conduction time, and AH interval could be determined at each current strength.In some patients atrioventricular nodal effective refractoriness could or could not be determined at each current strength, whereas in others the determination was possible only at the highest or the lowest current strengths. Moreover, the increase in current strength (a) induced a progressive parallel reduction in both atrial effective and functional refractoriness; (b) induced a progressive lengthening of intra-atrial conduction time (this was seen only in patients with a history of atrial arrhythmias); (c) allowed the maximum possible lengthening of AH interval; and (6) did not visibly influence atrioventricular nodal refractoriness and atrial latency.By altering atrial refractoriness and intra-atrial conduction time current strength affects the prematurity of the atrial impulse and the time at which it reaches the atrioventricular node. These findinns should be taken into account when diagnostic and therapeutic electrophysiological procedures are performed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-80
Number of pages5
JournalCardiovascular Research
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1986

Fingerprint

Atrioventricular Node
Excitability
Conduction
Poles
Cathodes
Vertex of a graph
Interval
Latency
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Electrodes
Arrhythmia
Human
Influence
Node
Impulse
Pole
Lowest
Diagnostics
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Atrium, atrioventricular node
  • Current strength
  • Impulse conduction
  • Refractoriness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Influence of current strength on excitability and conduction of human atrium and atrioventricular node. / Michelucci, Antonio; Padeletti, Luigi; Monizzi, Domenico; Fantini, Fabio.

In: Cardiovascular Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.1986, p. 76-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Michelucci, Antonio ; Padeletti, Luigi ; Monizzi, Domenico ; Fantini, Fabio. / Influence of current strength on excitability and conduction of human atrium and atrioventricular node. In: Cardiovascular Research. 1986 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 76-80.
@article{a67e1f0e0ae043f2b44e39b9ebc5609b,
title = "Influence of current strength on excitability and conduction of human atrium and atrioventricular node",
abstract = "Summary: The influence of current strength on excitability and conduction of atrium and atrioventricular node was assessed in 25 patients using different current strengths (2,3,4,5,7, 10, 15 mA) and introducing extrastimuli (parasinusal zone) after the eighth paced complex of a basic drive (100 beats·min-1). Bipolar stimulation with the distal pole as cathode was performed so that (a) effective and functional refractoriness of atrium and atrioventricular node, and (b) the maximum value of atrial latency (interval between the extrastimulus and the beginning of atrial activity), intra-atrial conduction time, and AH interval could be determined at each current strength.In some patients atrioventricular nodal effective refractoriness could or could not be determined at each current strength, whereas in others the determination was possible only at the highest or the lowest current strengths. Moreover, the increase in current strength (a) induced a progressive parallel reduction in both atrial effective and functional refractoriness; (b) induced a progressive lengthening of intra-atrial conduction time (this was seen only in patients with a history of atrial arrhythmias); (c) allowed the maximum possible lengthening of AH interval; and (6) did not visibly influence atrioventricular nodal refractoriness and atrial latency.By altering atrial refractoriness and intra-atrial conduction time current strength affects the prematurity of the atrial impulse and the time at which it reaches the atrioventricular node. These findinns should be taken into account when diagnostic and therapeutic electrophysiological procedures are performed.",
keywords = "Atrium, atrioventricular node, Current strength, Impulse conduction, Refractoriness",
author = "Antonio Michelucci and Luigi Padeletti and Domenico Monizzi and Fabio Fantini",
year = "1986",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1093/cvrese/20.1.76",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "76--80",
journal = "Cardiovascular Research",
issn = "0008-6363",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of current strength on excitability and conduction of human atrium and atrioventricular node

AU - Michelucci, Antonio

AU - Padeletti, Luigi

AU - Monizzi, Domenico

AU - Fantini, Fabio

PY - 1986/1

Y1 - 1986/1

N2 - Summary: The influence of current strength on excitability and conduction of atrium and atrioventricular node was assessed in 25 patients using different current strengths (2,3,4,5,7, 10, 15 mA) and introducing extrastimuli (parasinusal zone) after the eighth paced complex of a basic drive (100 beats·min-1). Bipolar stimulation with the distal pole as cathode was performed so that (a) effective and functional refractoriness of atrium and atrioventricular node, and (b) the maximum value of atrial latency (interval between the extrastimulus and the beginning of atrial activity), intra-atrial conduction time, and AH interval could be determined at each current strength.In some patients atrioventricular nodal effective refractoriness could or could not be determined at each current strength, whereas in others the determination was possible only at the highest or the lowest current strengths. Moreover, the increase in current strength (a) induced a progressive parallel reduction in both atrial effective and functional refractoriness; (b) induced a progressive lengthening of intra-atrial conduction time (this was seen only in patients with a history of atrial arrhythmias); (c) allowed the maximum possible lengthening of AH interval; and (6) did not visibly influence atrioventricular nodal refractoriness and atrial latency.By altering atrial refractoriness and intra-atrial conduction time current strength affects the prematurity of the atrial impulse and the time at which it reaches the atrioventricular node. These findinns should be taken into account when diagnostic and therapeutic electrophysiological procedures are performed.

AB - Summary: The influence of current strength on excitability and conduction of atrium and atrioventricular node was assessed in 25 patients using different current strengths (2,3,4,5,7, 10, 15 mA) and introducing extrastimuli (parasinusal zone) after the eighth paced complex of a basic drive (100 beats·min-1). Bipolar stimulation with the distal pole as cathode was performed so that (a) effective and functional refractoriness of atrium and atrioventricular node, and (b) the maximum value of atrial latency (interval between the extrastimulus and the beginning of atrial activity), intra-atrial conduction time, and AH interval could be determined at each current strength.In some patients atrioventricular nodal effective refractoriness could or could not be determined at each current strength, whereas in others the determination was possible only at the highest or the lowest current strengths. Moreover, the increase in current strength (a) induced a progressive parallel reduction in both atrial effective and functional refractoriness; (b) induced a progressive lengthening of intra-atrial conduction time (this was seen only in patients with a history of atrial arrhythmias); (c) allowed the maximum possible lengthening of AH interval; and (6) did not visibly influence atrioventricular nodal refractoriness and atrial latency.By altering atrial refractoriness and intra-atrial conduction time current strength affects the prematurity of the atrial impulse and the time at which it reaches the atrioventricular node. These findinns should be taken into account when diagnostic and therapeutic electrophysiological procedures are performed.

KW - Atrium, atrioventricular node

KW - Current strength

KW - Impulse conduction

KW - Refractoriness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022645757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022645757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/cvrese/20.1.76

DO - 10.1093/cvrese/20.1.76

M3 - Article

C2 - 3708642

VL - 20

SP - 76

EP - 80

JO - Cardiovascular Research

JF - Cardiovascular Research

SN - 0008-6363

IS - 1

ER -