Influence of intraocular lens haptic design on refractive error

Giacomo Savini, Piero Barboni, Pietro Ducoli, Enrico Borrelli, Kenneth J. Hoffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To assess the influence of intraocular (IOL) haptic design on the refraction prediction error in patients having cataract surgery. Setting Private practice. Design Comparative case series. Methods Corneal power and axial length were measured with the same devices in eyes with a 3-piece Acrysof IOL and eyes with a 1-piece Acrysof IOL and were entered into the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas. The median absolute error and mean absolute error in refraction prediction (ie, difference between expected refraction and actual refraction) were assessed 1 month postoperatively. Results The study evaluated 110 eyes with the 3-piece IOL and 84 eyes with the 1-piece IOL. With all formulas, the median absolute error was lower with the 3-piece IOL. It ranged between 0.15 diopter (D) (Haigis and Holladay 1) and 0.19 D (SRK/T) with the 3-piece IOL and between 0.23 D (Haigis) and 0.30 D (SRK/T) with the 1-piece IOL. With all formulas, a higher percentage of eyes with the 3-piece IOL were within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of the target refraction. Conclusions Three-piece IOLs may yield better refractive outcomes than 1-piece IOLs. A possible reason is that once the early forward IOL shift previously observed with the 3-piece design occurs because of the haptic-compression force decay typical of these IOLs, the rigid haptics of 3-piece IOLs still exert more pressure against the capsular bag than the haptics of 1-piece IOLs. Therefore, 3-piece IOLs may better resist subsequent capsule contraction and provide a more predictable effective lens position. Financial Disclosure Dr. Hoffer receives royalties for his book IOL Power, Slack, Inc., and formula royalties from all manufacturers using the Hoffer Q formula. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1473-1478
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume40
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Refractive Errors
Intraocular Lenses
Private Practice
Disclosure
Cataract
Lenses
Capsules
Pressure
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Surgery

Cite this

Influence of intraocular lens haptic design on refractive error. / Savini, Giacomo; Barboni, Piero; Ducoli, Pietro; Borrelli, Enrico; Hoffer, Kenneth J.

In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 40, No. 9, 2014, p. 1473-1478.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Savini, Giacomo ; Barboni, Piero ; Ducoli, Pietro ; Borrelli, Enrico ; Hoffer, Kenneth J. / Influence of intraocular lens haptic design on refractive error. In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 40, No. 9. pp. 1473-1478.
@article{314b835f92e04e16801b682d71fc1569,
title = "Influence of intraocular lens haptic design on refractive error",
abstract = "Purpose To assess the influence of intraocular (IOL) haptic design on the refraction prediction error in patients having cataract surgery. Setting Private practice. Design Comparative case series. Methods Corneal power and axial length were measured with the same devices in eyes with a 3-piece Acrysof IOL and eyes with a 1-piece Acrysof IOL and were entered into the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas. The median absolute error and mean absolute error in refraction prediction (ie, difference between expected refraction and actual refraction) were assessed 1 month postoperatively. Results The study evaluated 110 eyes with the 3-piece IOL and 84 eyes with the 1-piece IOL. With all formulas, the median absolute error was lower with the 3-piece IOL. It ranged between 0.15 diopter (D) (Haigis and Holladay 1) and 0.19 D (SRK/T) with the 3-piece IOL and between 0.23 D (Haigis) and 0.30 D (SRK/T) with the 1-piece IOL. With all formulas, a higher percentage of eyes with the 3-piece IOL were within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of the target refraction. Conclusions Three-piece IOLs may yield better refractive outcomes than 1-piece IOLs. A possible reason is that once the early forward IOL shift previously observed with the 3-piece design occurs because of the haptic-compression force decay typical of these IOLs, the rigid haptics of 3-piece IOLs still exert more pressure against the capsular bag than the haptics of 1-piece IOLs. Therefore, 3-piece IOLs may better resist subsequent capsule contraction and provide a more predictable effective lens position. Financial Disclosure Dr. Hoffer receives royalties for his book IOL Power, Slack, Inc., and formula royalties from all manufacturers using the Hoffer Q formula. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.",
author = "Giacomo Savini and Piero Barboni and Pietro Ducoli and Enrico Borrelli and Hoffer, {Kenneth J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.018",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1473--1478",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of intraocular lens haptic design on refractive error

AU - Savini, Giacomo

AU - Barboni, Piero

AU - Ducoli, Pietro

AU - Borrelli, Enrico

AU - Hoffer, Kenneth J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose To assess the influence of intraocular (IOL) haptic design on the refraction prediction error in patients having cataract surgery. Setting Private practice. Design Comparative case series. Methods Corneal power and axial length were measured with the same devices in eyes with a 3-piece Acrysof IOL and eyes with a 1-piece Acrysof IOL and were entered into the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas. The median absolute error and mean absolute error in refraction prediction (ie, difference between expected refraction and actual refraction) were assessed 1 month postoperatively. Results The study evaluated 110 eyes with the 3-piece IOL and 84 eyes with the 1-piece IOL. With all formulas, the median absolute error was lower with the 3-piece IOL. It ranged between 0.15 diopter (D) (Haigis and Holladay 1) and 0.19 D (SRK/T) with the 3-piece IOL and between 0.23 D (Haigis) and 0.30 D (SRK/T) with the 1-piece IOL. With all formulas, a higher percentage of eyes with the 3-piece IOL were within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of the target refraction. Conclusions Three-piece IOLs may yield better refractive outcomes than 1-piece IOLs. A possible reason is that once the early forward IOL shift previously observed with the 3-piece design occurs because of the haptic-compression force decay typical of these IOLs, the rigid haptics of 3-piece IOLs still exert more pressure against the capsular bag than the haptics of 1-piece IOLs. Therefore, 3-piece IOLs may better resist subsequent capsule contraction and provide a more predictable effective lens position. Financial Disclosure Dr. Hoffer receives royalties for his book IOL Power, Slack, Inc., and formula royalties from all manufacturers using the Hoffer Q formula. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

AB - Purpose To assess the influence of intraocular (IOL) haptic design on the refraction prediction error in patients having cataract surgery. Setting Private practice. Design Comparative case series. Methods Corneal power and axial length were measured with the same devices in eyes with a 3-piece Acrysof IOL and eyes with a 1-piece Acrysof IOL and were entered into the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas. The median absolute error and mean absolute error in refraction prediction (ie, difference between expected refraction and actual refraction) were assessed 1 month postoperatively. Results The study evaluated 110 eyes with the 3-piece IOL and 84 eyes with the 1-piece IOL. With all formulas, the median absolute error was lower with the 3-piece IOL. It ranged between 0.15 diopter (D) (Haigis and Holladay 1) and 0.19 D (SRK/T) with the 3-piece IOL and between 0.23 D (Haigis) and 0.30 D (SRK/T) with the 1-piece IOL. With all formulas, a higher percentage of eyes with the 3-piece IOL were within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of the target refraction. Conclusions Three-piece IOLs may yield better refractive outcomes than 1-piece IOLs. A possible reason is that once the early forward IOL shift previously observed with the 3-piece design occurs because of the haptic-compression force decay typical of these IOLs, the rigid haptics of 3-piece IOLs still exert more pressure against the capsular bag than the haptics of 1-piece IOLs. Therefore, 3-piece IOLs may better resist subsequent capsule contraction and provide a more predictable effective lens position. Financial Disclosure Dr. Hoffer receives royalties for his book IOL Power, Slack, Inc., and formula royalties from all manufacturers using the Hoffer Q formula. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906309137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906309137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.018

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84906309137

VL - 40

SP - 1473

EP - 1478

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 9

ER -