Influence of medical audit on electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy. A multicentre study

Kirsten Pugdahl, Hatice Tankisi, Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Birger Johnsen, Mamede De Carvalho, Peter R W Fawcett, Annick Labarre-Vila, Rocco Liguori, Wilfred Nix, Mette L. Olsen, Ian S. Schofield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Since 1992, 7 European neurophysiologists have participated in the ESTEEM project concerned with improvements in electrodiagnostic medicine. This study assesses whether the collaboration that includes peer review medical audit has influenced the involved physicians' electrodiagnostic criteria for polyneuropathy (PNP) diagnosing and classification. Methods: Two sets of each physician's PNP examinations performed early and late in the study were examined for changes in (1) number of studies with abnormal electrophysiological findings required for diagnosing PNP, and (2) agreement between the classifications given by the individual physicians and the peer review group. Results: The average number of abnormal motor nerve segments per patient increased from 4.6 to 6.4 during the study. Although most individual changes were minor, the second set of examinations showed an increased homogeneity among the physicians in the number of abnormal motor nerve segments and abnormal F wave studies, and a tendency towards increased homogeneity in the number of abnormal sensory nerve segments. There was also an increased agreement on pathophysiological PNP classification in the second set of examinations compared to the first set. Conclusions: The participation in the ESTEEM project seems to have impacted the physicians' clinical routine, possibly as they have accustomed themselves to apply criteria more strictly. Significance: This study support that international collaboration is a useful step towards improvements in electrodiagnostic medicine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-55
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume116
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Medical Audit
Polyneuropathies
Multicenter Studies
Physicians
Peer Review
Medicine
Peer Group

Keywords

  • Electrodiagnostic medicine
  • Medical audit
  • Multicenter database
  • Peer review
  • Polyneuropathy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Neurology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Pugdahl, K., Tankisi, H., Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A., Johnsen, B., De Carvalho, M., Fawcett, P. R. W., ... Schofield, I. S. (2005). Influence of medical audit on electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy. A multicentre study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.07.026

Influence of medical audit on electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy. A multicentre study. / Pugdahl, Kirsten; Tankisi, Hatice; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders; Johnsen, Birger; De Carvalho, Mamede; Fawcett, Peter R W; Labarre-Vila, Annick; Liguori, Rocco; Nix, Wilfred; Olsen, Mette L.; Schofield, Ian S.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 116, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 49-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pugdahl, K, Tankisi, H, Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A, Johnsen, B, De Carvalho, M, Fawcett, PRW, Labarre-Vila, A, Liguori, R, Nix, W, Olsen, ML & Schofield, IS 2005, 'Influence of medical audit on electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy. A multicentre study', Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.07.026
Pugdahl K, Tankisi H, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Johnsen B, De Carvalho M, Fawcett PRW et al. Influence of medical audit on electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy. A multicentre study. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2005 Jan 1;116(1):49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.07.026
Pugdahl, Kirsten ; Tankisi, Hatice ; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders ; Johnsen, Birger ; De Carvalho, Mamede ; Fawcett, Peter R W ; Labarre-Vila, Annick ; Liguori, Rocco ; Nix, Wilfred ; Olsen, Mette L. ; Schofield, Ian S. / Influence of medical audit on electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy. A multicentre study. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. 2005 ; Vol. 116, No. 1. pp. 49-55.
@article{9b9e8cdcbfb4487f9f0a5bfbf1835c3a,
title = "Influence of medical audit on electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy. A multicentre study",
abstract = "Objective: Since 1992, 7 European neurophysiologists have participated in the ESTEEM project concerned with improvements in electrodiagnostic medicine. This study assesses whether the collaboration that includes peer review medical audit has influenced the involved physicians' electrodiagnostic criteria for polyneuropathy (PNP) diagnosing and classification. Methods: Two sets of each physician's PNP examinations performed early and late in the study were examined for changes in (1) number of studies with abnormal electrophysiological findings required for diagnosing PNP, and (2) agreement between the classifications given by the individual physicians and the peer review group. Results: The average number of abnormal motor nerve segments per patient increased from 4.6 to 6.4 during the study. Although most individual changes were minor, the second set of examinations showed an increased homogeneity among the physicians in the number of abnormal motor nerve segments and abnormal F wave studies, and a tendency towards increased homogeneity in the number of abnormal sensory nerve segments. There was also an increased agreement on pathophysiological PNP classification in the second set of examinations compared to the first set. Conclusions: The participation in the ESTEEM project seems to have impacted the physicians' clinical routine, possibly as they have accustomed themselves to apply criteria more strictly. Significance: This study support that international collaboration is a useful step towards improvements in electrodiagnostic medicine.",
keywords = "Electrodiagnostic medicine, Medical audit, Multicenter database, Peer review, Polyneuropathy",
author = "Kirsten Pugdahl and Hatice Tankisi and Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen and Birger Johnsen and {De Carvalho}, Mamede and Fawcett, {Peter R W} and Annick Labarre-Vila and Rocco Liguori and Wilfred Nix and Olsen, {Mette L.} and Schofield, {Ian S.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2004.07.026",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "49--55",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of medical audit on electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy. A multicentre study

AU - Pugdahl, Kirsten

AU - Tankisi, Hatice

AU - Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders

AU - Johnsen, Birger

AU - De Carvalho, Mamede

AU - Fawcett, Peter R W

AU - Labarre-Vila, Annick

AU - Liguori, Rocco

AU - Nix, Wilfred

AU - Olsen, Mette L.

AU - Schofield, Ian S.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Objective: Since 1992, 7 European neurophysiologists have participated in the ESTEEM project concerned with improvements in electrodiagnostic medicine. This study assesses whether the collaboration that includes peer review medical audit has influenced the involved physicians' electrodiagnostic criteria for polyneuropathy (PNP) diagnosing and classification. Methods: Two sets of each physician's PNP examinations performed early and late in the study were examined for changes in (1) number of studies with abnormal electrophysiological findings required for diagnosing PNP, and (2) agreement between the classifications given by the individual physicians and the peer review group. Results: The average number of abnormal motor nerve segments per patient increased from 4.6 to 6.4 during the study. Although most individual changes were minor, the second set of examinations showed an increased homogeneity among the physicians in the number of abnormal motor nerve segments and abnormal F wave studies, and a tendency towards increased homogeneity in the number of abnormal sensory nerve segments. There was also an increased agreement on pathophysiological PNP classification in the second set of examinations compared to the first set. Conclusions: The participation in the ESTEEM project seems to have impacted the physicians' clinical routine, possibly as they have accustomed themselves to apply criteria more strictly. Significance: This study support that international collaboration is a useful step towards improvements in electrodiagnostic medicine.

AB - Objective: Since 1992, 7 European neurophysiologists have participated in the ESTEEM project concerned with improvements in electrodiagnostic medicine. This study assesses whether the collaboration that includes peer review medical audit has influenced the involved physicians' electrodiagnostic criteria for polyneuropathy (PNP) diagnosing and classification. Methods: Two sets of each physician's PNP examinations performed early and late in the study were examined for changes in (1) number of studies with abnormal electrophysiological findings required for diagnosing PNP, and (2) agreement between the classifications given by the individual physicians and the peer review group. Results: The average number of abnormal motor nerve segments per patient increased from 4.6 to 6.4 during the study. Although most individual changes were minor, the second set of examinations showed an increased homogeneity among the physicians in the number of abnormal motor nerve segments and abnormal F wave studies, and a tendency towards increased homogeneity in the number of abnormal sensory nerve segments. There was also an increased agreement on pathophysiological PNP classification in the second set of examinations compared to the first set. Conclusions: The participation in the ESTEEM project seems to have impacted the physicians' clinical routine, possibly as they have accustomed themselves to apply criteria more strictly. Significance: This study support that international collaboration is a useful step towards improvements in electrodiagnostic medicine.

KW - Electrodiagnostic medicine

KW - Medical audit

KW - Multicenter database

KW - Peer review

KW - Polyneuropathy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844321344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13844321344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.07.026

DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.07.026

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 49

EP - 55

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 1

ER -