Influence of osteomyelitis location in the foot of diabetic patients with transtibial amputation

Ezio Faglia, Giacomo Clerici, Maurizio Caminiti, Vincenzo Curci, Francesco Somalvico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the prevalence of osteomyelitis in different areas of the foot and the possible correlation between localization and outcome of major amputation. Methods: From January 2008 to December 2010, a total of 350 diabetic patients were admitted to our diabetic foot unit for the surgical treatment of osteomyelitis. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed when both the probe-to-bone maneuver and plain radiography were positive. In all of these patients, osteomyelitis was confirmed by histological examination. Results: Osteomyelitis was localized to the forefoot in 300 (85.7%) patients, to the midfoot in 27 (7.7%) patients, and to the hindfoot in the remaining 23 (6.75) patients. On average, foot lesions had developed 6.6 ± 5.6 months before admission to our unit. Transtibial amputation was performed in 1 (0.33%) patient with forefoot osteomyelitis, in 5 (18.5%) patients with midfoot osteomyelitis, and in 12 (52.2%) patients with osteomyelitis of the heel (χ2 = 128.4, P <.001). Multivariate analysis showed the independent role that osteomyelitis in the heel region had in major amputation outcome (odds ratio 15.3; P <.001; confidence interval, 17.4-5336.0), dialysis treatment (odds ratio 6.3; P = .012; confidence interval, 2.5-1667.2), and leukocyte count greater than 103 mm3 (odds ratio 2.25; P = .036; confidence interval, 1.1-76.6). Conclusions: We found a higher rate of transtibial amputation when osteomyelitis involved the heel instead of the midfoot or forefoot in diabetic patients. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)222-227
Number of pages6
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Diabetic Foot
Osteomyelitis
Amputation
Heel
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Foot
Leukocyte Count
Radiography
Dialysis
Multivariate Analysis
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Diabetic foot
  • Forefoot
  • Heel
  • Major amputation
  • Midfoot
  • Osteomyelitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Influence of osteomyelitis location in the foot of diabetic patients with transtibial amputation. / Faglia, Ezio; Clerici, Giacomo; Caminiti, Maurizio; Curci, Vincenzo; Somalvico, Francesco.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 34, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 222-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Faglia, Ezio ; Clerici, Giacomo ; Caminiti, Maurizio ; Curci, Vincenzo ; Somalvico, Francesco. / Influence of osteomyelitis location in the foot of diabetic patients with transtibial amputation. In: Foot and Ankle International. 2013 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 222-227.
@article{06beec30de40421092473b88d4eea1f4,
title = "Influence of osteomyelitis location in the foot of diabetic patients with transtibial amputation",
abstract = "Background: To evaluate the prevalence of osteomyelitis in different areas of the foot and the possible correlation between localization and outcome of major amputation. Methods: From January 2008 to December 2010, a total of 350 diabetic patients were admitted to our diabetic foot unit for the surgical treatment of osteomyelitis. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed when both the probe-to-bone maneuver and plain radiography were positive. In all of these patients, osteomyelitis was confirmed by histological examination. Results: Osteomyelitis was localized to the forefoot in 300 (85.7{\%}) patients, to the midfoot in 27 (7.7{\%}) patients, and to the hindfoot in the remaining 23 (6.75) patients. On average, foot lesions had developed 6.6 ± 5.6 months before admission to our unit. Transtibial amputation was performed in 1 (0.33{\%}) patient with forefoot osteomyelitis, in 5 (18.5{\%}) patients with midfoot osteomyelitis, and in 12 (52.2{\%}) patients with osteomyelitis of the heel (χ2 = 128.4, P <.001). Multivariate analysis showed the independent role that osteomyelitis in the heel region had in major amputation outcome (odds ratio 15.3; P <.001; confidence interval, 17.4-5336.0), dialysis treatment (odds ratio 6.3; P = .012; confidence interval, 2.5-1667.2), and leukocyte count greater than 103 mm3 (odds ratio 2.25; P = .036; confidence interval, 1.1-76.6). Conclusions: We found a higher rate of transtibial amputation when osteomyelitis involved the heel instead of the midfoot or forefoot in diabetic patients. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.",
keywords = "Diabetic foot, Forefoot, Heel, Major amputation, Midfoot, Osteomyelitis",
author = "Ezio Faglia and Giacomo Clerici and Maurizio Caminiti and Vincenzo Curci and Francesco Somalvico",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/1071100712467436",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "222--227",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of osteomyelitis location in the foot of diabetic patients with transtibial amputation

AU - Faglia, Ezio

AU - Clerici, Giacomo

AU - Caminiti, Maurizio

AU - Curci, Vincenzo

AU - Somalvico, Francesco

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Background: To evaluate the prevalence of osteomyelitis in different areas of the foot and the possible correlation between localization and outcome of major amputation. Methods: From January 2008 to December 2010, a total of 350 diabetic patients were admitted to our diabetic foot unit for the surgical treatment of osteomyelitis. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed when both the probe-to-bone maneuver and plain radiography were positive. In all of these patients, osteomyelitis was confirmed by histological examination. Results: Osteomyelitis was localized to the forefoot in 300 (85.7%) patients, to the midfoot in 27 (7.7%) patients, and to the hindfoot in the remaining 23 (6.75) patients. On average, foot lesions had developed 6.6 ± 5.6 months before admission to our unit. Transtibial amputation was performed in 1 (0.33%) patient with forefoot osteomyelitis, in 5 (18.5%) patients with midfoot osteomyelitis, and in 12 (52.2%) patients with osteomyelitis of the heel (χ2 = 128.4, P <.001). Multivariate analysis showed the independent role that osteomyelitis in the heel region had in major amputation outcome (odds ratio 15.3; P <.001; confidence interval, 17.4-5336.0), dialysis treatment (odds ratio 6.3; P = .012; confidence interval, 2.5-1667.2), and leukocyte count greater than 103 mm3 (odds ratio 2.25; P = .036; confidence interval, 1.1-76.6). Conclusions: We found a higher rate of transtibial amputation when osteomyelitis involved the heel instead of the midfoot or forefoot in diabetic patients. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

AB - Background: To evaluate the prevalence of osteomyelitis in different areas of the foot and the possible correlation between localization and outcome of major amputation. Methods: From January 2008 to December 2010, a total of 350 diabetic patients were admitted to our diabetic foot unit for the surgical treatment of osteomyelitis. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed when both the probe-to-bone maneuver and plain radiography were positive. In all of these patients, osteomyelitis was confirmed by histological examination. Results: Osteomyelitis was localized to the forefoot in 300 (85.7%) patients, to the midfoot in 27 (7.7%) patients, and to the hindfoot in the remaining 23 (6.75) patients. On average, foot lesions had developed 6.6 ± 5.6 months before admission to our unit. Transtibial amputation was performed in 1 (0.33%) patient with forefoot osteomyelitis, in 5 (18.5%) patients with midfoot osteomyelitis, and in 12 (52.2%) patients with osteomyelitis of the heel (χ2 = 128.4, P <.001). Multivariate analysis showed the independent role that osteomyelitis in the heel region had in major amputation outcome (odds ratio 15.3; P <.001; confidence interval, 17.4-5336.0), dialysis treatment (odds ratio 6.3; P = .012; confidence interval, 2.5-1667.2), and leukocyte count greater than 103 mm3 (odds ratio 2.25; P = .036; confidence interval, 1.1-76.6). Conclusions: We found a higher rate of transtibial amputation when osteomyelitis involved the heel instead of the midfoot or forefoot in diabetic patients. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

KW - Diabetic foot

KW - Forefoot

KW - Heel

KW - Major amputation

KW - Midfoot

KW - Osteomyelitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875894414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875894414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1071100712467436

DO - 10.1177/1071100712467436

M3 - Article

C2 - 23413061

AN - SCOPUS:84875894414

VL - 34

SP - 222

EP - 227

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 2

ER -