TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of peer review medical audit on pathophysiological interpretation of nerve conduction studies in polyneuropathies
AU - Tankisi, Hatice
AU - Pugdahl, Kirsten
AU - Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders
AU - Johnsen, Birger
AU - Carvalho, Mamede de
AU - Fawcett, Peter R W
AU - Labarre-Vila, Annick
AU - Liguori, Rocco
AU - Nix, Wilfred A.
AU - Olsen, Mette L.
AU - Schofield, Ian S.
PY - 2006/5
Y1 - 2006/5
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the possible influence of peer review medical audit on experienced physicians' pathophysiological interpretation of nerve conduction studies in polyneuropathy patients. Methods: Since 1992, 7 European neurophysiologists have collected samples of their patient examinations for regular review where the physicians interpret each other's cases electronically and subsequently discuss them at regular workshop meetings (i.e. a form of medical audit). Two sets of 100 polyneuropathy examinations interpreted with an interval of 4-6 years were selected. The sets contained 1456 and 1719 nerve conduction studies, each given a pathophysiological test conclusion by each individual physician. Inter-physician agreement on interpretation of demyelination and axonal loss of the nerve, as well as neuropathic and unspecific findings, was estimated using kappa statistics. Results: Increased agreement from set 1 to set 2 was found on interpretation of demyelination of the nerve (set 1: κ=0.22; set 2: κ=0.45), and of neuropathic (set 1: κ=0.46; set 2: κ=0.64) and unspecific findings (set 1: κ=0.35; set 2: κ=0.54). No changes were found on interpretation of axonal loss (set 1: κ=0.26; set 2: κ=0.31) and normal findings (set 1 and set 2: κ=0.90). Conclusions: Participation in regular peer review medical audit resulted in increased agreement on interpretation of nerve conduction studies for 6 of the 7 participants. The study further highlights the need for better definition of criteria for identification of demyelinating, and in particular, axonal peripheral neuropathies. Significance: International collaboration involving peer review medical audit may contribute to development of practice guidelines and, in turn, to increased quality of electrodiagnostic medicine.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the possible influence of peer review medical audit on experienced physicians' pathophysiological interpretation of nerve conduction studies in polyneuropathy patients. Methods: Since 1992, 7 European neurophysiologists have collected samples of their patient examinations for regular review where the physicians interpret each other's cases electronically and subsequently discuss them at regular workshop meetings (i.e. a form of medical audit). Two sets of 100 polyneuropathy examinations interpreted with an interval of 4-6 years were selected. The sets contained 1456 and 1719 nerve conduction studies, each given a pathophysiological test conclusion by each individual physician. Inter-physician agreement on interpretation of demyelination and axonal loss of the nerve, as well as neuropathic and unspecific findings, was estimated using kappa statistics. Results: Increased agreement from set 1 to set 2 was found on interpretation of demyelination of the nerve (set 1: κ=0.22; set 2: κ=0.45), and of neuropathic (set 1: κ=0.46; set 2: κ=0.64) and unspecific findings (set 1: κ=0.35; set 2: κ=0.54). No changes were found on interpretation of axonal loss (set 1: κ=0.26; set 2: κ=0.31) and normal findings (set 1 and set 2: κ=0.90). Conclusions: Participation in regular peer review medical audit resulted in increased agreement on interpretation of nerve conduction studies for 6 of the 7 participants. The study further highlights the need for better definition of criteria for identification of demyelinating, and in particular, axonal peripheral neuropathies. Significance: International collaboration involving peer review medical audit may contribute to development of practice guidelines and, in turn, to increased quality of electrodiagnostic medicine.
KW - Multicentre database
KW - Nerve conduction studies
KW - Nerve pathophysiology
KW - Peer review medical audit
KW - Polyneuropathy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646481837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646481837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.010
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 16516542
AN - SCOPUS:33646481837
VL - 117
SP - 979
EP - 983
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
SN - 1388-2457
IS - 5
ER -