Inhibition of human muscle sympathetic activity by sensory stimulation

Vincenzo Donadio, Mika Kallio, Tomas Karlsson, Magnus Nordin, B. Gunnar Wallin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surprising sensory stimuli causing arousal are known to evoke short-lasting activation of human sympathetic activity in skin but not in muscle nerves; anecdotal observations suggest that there may even be an inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). To test this hypothesis we recorded multiunit MSNA in the peroneal nerve in 19 subjects aged 19-71 years, while sensory stimuli, consisting of either an electrical skin stimulus to a finger or a visual flash, were delivered repeatedly with intervals of approximately 20 s. The stimuli were given either 200 or 400 ms after the R wave of the electrocardiogram. Dummy stimuli, consisting of trigger pulses without sensory stimulation served as controls. Electrical skin resistance reductions were monitored from the palm of a hand as electrodermal signs of arousal-induced cutaneous sympathetic activity. On a group basis both types of sensory stimuli attenuated the amplitude of one or two bursts of MSNA, while no such effects occurred after dummy stimuli. Individually, the inhibition was evoked by at least one stimulus modality or delay in 16 subjects whereas in three subjects no significant inhibition occurred. Skin resistance responses were evoked in all subjects. Some subjects responded to one, others to both stimulus modalities, and electrical stimuli were more effective than visual stimuli in causing MSNA inhibition as well as skin resistance reduction. On the other hand, electrodermal signs of arousal were equally common in subjects with and without inhibitory responses. We suggest that the MSNA inhibition evoked by sensory stimuli is an arousal effect which varies markedly between individuals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-292
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Physiology
Volume544
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2002

Fingerprint

Arousal
Muscles
Skin
Peroneal Nerve
Electric Impedance
Human Activities
Fingers
Inhibition (Psychology)
Electrocardiography
Hand

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

Inhibition of human muscle sympathetic activity by sensory stimulation. / Donadio, Vincenzo; Kallio, Mika; Karlsson, Tomas; Nordin, Magnus; Wallin, B. Gunnar.

In: Journal of Physiology, Vol. 544, No. 1, 01.10.2002, p. 285-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Donadio, Vincenzo ; Kallio, Mika ; Karlsson, Tomas ; Nordin, Magnus ; Wallin, B. Gunnar. / Inhibition of human muscle sympathetic activity by sensory stimulation. In: Journal of Physiology. 2002 ; Vol. 544, No. 1. pp. 285-292.
@article{e5a89b3e948e4b38a158868280002aee,
title = "Inhibition of human muscle sympathetic activity by sensory stimulation",
abstract = "Surprising sensory stimuli causing arousal are known to evoke short-lasting activation of human sympathetic activity in skin but not in muscle nerves; anecdotal observations suggest that there may even be an inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). To test this hypothesis we recorded multiunit MSNA in the peroneal nerve in 19 subjects aged 19-71 years, while sensory stimuli, consisting of either an electrical skin stimulus to a finger or a visual flash, were delivered repeatedly with intervals of approximately 20 s. The stimuli were given either 200 or 400 ms after the R wave of the electrocardiogram. Dummy stimuli, consisting of trigger pulses without sensory stimulation served as controls. Electrical skin resistance reductions were monitored from the palm of a hand as electrodermal signs of arousal-induced cutaneous sympathetic activity. On a group basis both types of sensory stimuli attenuated the amplitude of one or two bursts of MSNA, while no such effects occurred after dummy stimuli. Individually, the inhibition was evoked by at least one stimulus modality or delay in 16 subjects whereas in three subjects no significant inhibition occurred. Skin resistance responses were evoked in all subjects. Some subjects responded to one, others to both stimulus modalities, and electrical stimuli were more effective than visual stimuli in causing MSNA inhibition as well as skin resistance reduction. On the other hand, electrodermal signs of arousal were equally common in subjects with and without inhibitory responses. We suggest that the MSNA inhibition evoked by sensory stimuli is an arousal effect which varies markedly between individuals.",
author = "Vincenzo Donadio and Mika Kallio and Tomas Karlsson and Magnus Nordin and Wallin, {B. Gunnar}",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1113/jphysiol.2002.019596",
language = "English",
volume = "544",
pages = "285--292",
journal = "Journal of Physiology",
issn = "0022-3751",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhibition of human muscle sympathetic activity by sensory stimulation

AU - Donadio, Vincenzo

AU - Kallio, Mika

AU - Karlsson, Tomas

AU - Nordin, Magnus

AU - Wallin, B. Gunnar

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - Surprising sensory stimuli causing arousal are known to evoke short-lasting activation of human sympathetic activity in skin but not in muscle nerves; anecdotal observations suggest that there may even be an inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). To test this hypothesis we recorded multiunit MSNA in the peroneal nerve in 19 subjects aged 19-71 years, while sensory stimuli, consisting of either an electrical skin stimulus to a finger or a visual flash, were delivered repeatedly with intervals of approximately 20 s. The stimuli were given either 200 or 400 ms after the R wave of the electrocardiogram. Dummy stimuli, consisting of trigger pulses without sensory stimulation served as controls. Electrical skin resistance reductions were monitored from the palm of a hand as electrodermal signs of arousal-induced cutaneous sympathetic activity. On a group basis both types of sensory stimuli attenuated the amplitude of one or two bursts of MSNA, while no such effects occurred after dummy stimuli. Individually, the inhibition was evoked by at least one stimulus modality or delay in 16 subjects whereas in three subjects no significant inhibition occurred. Skin resistance responses were evoked in all subjects. Some subjects responded to one, others to both stimulus modalities, and electrical stimuli were more effective than visual stimuli in causing MSNA inhibition as well as skin resistance reduction. On the other hand, electrodermal signs of arousal were equally common in subjects with and without inhibitory responses. We suggest that the MSNA inhibition evoked by sensory stimuli is an arousal effect which varies markedly between individuals.

AB - Surprising sensory stimuli causing arousal are known to evoke short-lasting activation of human sympathetic activity in skin but not in muscle nerves; anecdotal observations suggest that there may even be an inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). To test this hypothesis we recorded multiunit MSNA in the peroneal nerve in 19 subjects aged 19-71 years, while sensory stimuli, consisting of either an electrical skin stimulus to a finger or a visual flash, were delivered repeatedly with intervals of approximately 20 s. The stimuli were given either 200 or 400 ms after the R wave of the electrocardiogram. Dummy stimuli, consisting of trigger pulses without sensory stimulation served as controls. Electrical skin resistance reductions were monitored from the palm of a hand as electrodermal signs of arousal-induced cutaneous sympathetic activity. On a group basis both types of sensory stimuli attenuated the amplitude of one or two bursts of MSNA, while no such effects occurred after dummy stimuli. Individually, the inhibition was evoked by at least one stimulus modality or delay in 16 subjects whereas in three subjects no significant inhibition occurred. Skin resistance responses were evoked in all subjects. Some subjects responded to one, others to both stimulus modalities, and electrical stimuli were more effective than visual stimuli in causing MSNA inhibition as well as skin resistance reduction. On the other hand, electrodermal signs of arousal were equally common in subjects with and without inhibitory responses. We suggest that the MSNA inhibition evoked by sensory stimuli is an arousal effect which varies markedly between individuals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036794503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036794503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.019596

DO - 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.019596

M3 - Article

C2 - 12356899

AN - SCOPUS:0036794503

VL - 544

SP - 285

EP - 292

JO - Journal of Physiology

JF - Journal of Physiology

SN - 0022-3751

IS - 1

ER -