Insignificant C1 effects cannot be called ‘marginally significant’

Francesco Di Russo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Slotnick (this issue) proposes that the earliest ERP C1 component, evoked by visual stimuli, may be affected by attention if certain experimental parameters are used. My opinion on this paper is that some results of previous papers are forced to appear significant even though they were not. This commentary focuses on Slotnick’s description of my cited papers and clarifies that there were not in fact any significant C1 attention effects present. Even though the C1 was often numerically larger in the attended condition, the statistical tests of these effects were far from significance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-2
Number of pages2
JournalCognitive Neuroscience
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Oct 9 2017

Keywords

  • C1
  • ERP
  • spatial attention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Insignificant C1 effects cannot be called ‘marginally significant’. / Di Russo, Francesco.

In: Cognitive Neuroscience, 09.10.2017, p. 1-2.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3de807da700240dbb1e3f14dfe88308b,
title = "Insignificant C1 effects cannot be called ‘marginally significant’",
abstract = "Slotnick (this issue) proposes that the earliest ERP C1 component, evoked by visual stimuli, may be affected by attention if certain experimental parameters are used. My opinion on this paper is that some results of previous papers are forced to appear significant even though they were not. This commentary focuses on Slotnick’s description of my cited papers and clarifies that there were not in fact any significant C1 attention effects present. Even though the C1 was often numerically larger in the attended condition, the statistical tests of these effects were far from significance.",
keywords = "C1, ERP, spatial attention",
author = "{Di Russo}, Francesco",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1080/17588928.2017.1386641",
language = "English",
pages = "1--2",
journal = "Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "1758-8928",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insignificant C1 effects cannot be called ‘marginally significant’

AU - Di Russo, Francesco

PY - 2017/10/9

Y1 - 2017/10/9

N2 - Slotnick (this issue) proposes that the earliest ERP C1 component, evoked by visual stimuli, may be affected by attention if certain experimental parameters are used. My opinion on this paper is that some results of previous papers are forced to appear significant even though they were not. This commentary focuses on Slotnick’s description of my cited papers and clarifies that there were not in fact any significant C1 attention effects present. Even though the C1 was often numerically larger in the attended condition, the statistical tests of these effects were far from significance.

AB - Slotnick (this issue) proposes that the earliest ERP C1 component, evoked by visual stimuli, may be affected by attention if certain experimental parameters are used. My opinion on this paper is that some results of previous papers are forced to appear significant even though they were not. This commentary focuses on Slotnick’s description of my cited papers and clarifies that there were not in fact any significant C1 attention effects present. Even though the C1 was often numerically larger in the attended condition, the statistical tests of these effects were far from significance.

KW - C1

KW - ERP

KW - spatial attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030840556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030840556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17588928.2017.1386641

DO - 10.1080/17588928.2017.1386641

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85030840556

SP - 1

EP - 2

JO - Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 1758-8928

ER -