Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose minimal models

Validation against clamp

Chiara Dalla Man, Kevin E. Yarasheski, Andrea Caumo, Heather Robertson, Gianna Toffolo, Kenneth S. Polonsky, Claudio Cobelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Measuring insulin sensitivity in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, e.g., during a meal or OGTT, is important to better understand insulin resistance in a variety of metabolic conditions. Recently, two oral minimal models have been proposed to measure overall insulin sensitivity (SI) and its selective effect on glucose disposal (SI*) from oral tests. SI and SI* have been successfully validated against multiple tracer meal estimates, but validation against euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp estimates is lacking. Here, we do so in 21 subjects who underwent both a multiple-tracer OGTT and a labeled euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Correlation between minimal-model SI, SI* and corresponding clamp estimates SI*clamp, SI*clamp was satisfactory, respectively r = 0.81, P <0.001, and r = 0.71, P <0.001. SI was significantly lower than SI clamp (8.08 ± 0.89 vs. 13.66 ± 1.69 10-4 dl·kg-1 ·min-1 per μU/ml, P = 0.0002), whereas SI* and SI*clamp were very similar 8.17 ± 1.59 vs. 8.84 ± 1.39 10-4 dl·kg-1·min-1 per μU/ml, P = 0.52). These results add credibility to the oral minimal-model method as a simple and reliable physiological tool to estimate SI and SI*, also in large-scale clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume289
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Clamping devices
Insulin Resistance
Glucose Clamp Technique
Insulin
Glucose Tolerance Test
Glucose
Meals
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • Insulin action
  • Insulin resistance
  • Meal
  • Oral glucose tolerance test
  • Tracer kinetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Endocrinology
  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Man, C. D., Yarasheski, K. E., Caumo, A., Robertson, H., Toffolo, G., Polonsky, K. S., & Cobelli, C. (2005). Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose minimal models: Validation against clamp. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism, 289(6). https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00076.2005

Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose minimal models : Validation against clamp. / Man, Chiara Dalla; Yarasheski, Kevin E.; Caumo, Andrea; Robertson, Heather; Toffolo, Gianna; Polonsky, Kenneth S.; Cobelli, Claudio.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol. 289, No. 6, 12.2005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Man, Chiara Dalla ; Yarasheski, Kevin E. ; Caumo, Andrea ; Robertson, Heather ; Toffolo, Gianna ; Polonsky, Kenneth S. ; Cobelli, Claudio. / Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose minimal models : Validation against clamp. In: American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2005 ; Vol. 289, No. 6.
@article{0d7b3261e53d4ef1a8e9c05c34b84b22,
title = "Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose minimal models: Validation against clamp",
abstract = "Measuring insulin sensitivity in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, e.g., during a meal or OGTT, is important to better understand insulin resistance in a variety of metabolic conditions. Recently, two oral minimal models have been proposed to measure overall insulin sensitivity (SI) and its selective effect on glucose disposal (SI*) from oral tests. SI and SI* have been successfully validated against multiple tracer meal estimates, but validation against euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp estimates is lacking. Here, we do so in 21 subjects who underwent both a multiple-tracer OGTT and a labeled euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Correlation between minimal-model SI, SI* and corresponding clamp estimates SI*clamp, SI*clamp was satisfactory, respectively r = 0.81, P <0.001, and r = 0.71, P <0.001. SI was significantly lower than SI clamp (8.08 ± 0.89 vs. 13.66 ± 1.69 10-4 dl·kg-1 ·min-1 per μU/ml, P = 0.0002), whereas SI* and SI*clamp were very similar 8.17 ± 1.59 vs. 8.84 ± 1.39 10-4 dl·kg-1·min-1 per μU/ml, P = 0.52). These results add credibility to the oral minimal-model method as a simple and reliable physiological tool to estimate SI and SI*, also in large-scale clinical trials.",
keywords = "Insulin action, Insulin resistance, Meal, Oral glucose tolerance test, Tracer kinetics",
author = "Man, {Chiara Dalla} and Yarasheski, {Kevin E.} and Andrea Caumo and Heather Robertson and Gianna Toffolo and Polonsky, {Kenneth S.} and Claudio Cobelli",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1152/ajpendo.00076.2005",
language = "English",
volume = "289",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology",
issn = "0363-6119",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose minimal models

T2 - Validation against clamp

AU - Man, Chiara Dalla

AU - Yarasheski, Kevin E.

AU - Caumo, Andrea

AU - Robertson, Heather

AU - Toffolo, Gianna

AU - Polonsky, Kenneth S.

AU - Cobelli, Claudio

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Measuring insulin sensitivity in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, e.g., during a meal or OGTT, is important to better understand insulin resistance in a variety of metabolic conditions. Recently, two oral minimal models have been proposed to measure overall insulin sensitivity (SI) and its selective effect on glucose disposal (SI*) from oral tests. SI and SI* have been successfully validated against multiple tracer meal estimates, but validation against euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp estimates is lacking. Here, we do so in 21 subjects who underwent both a multiple-tracer OGTT and a labeled euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Correlation between minimal-model SI, SI* and corresponding clamp estimates SI*clamp, SI*clamp was satisfactory, respectively r = 0.81, P <0.001, and r = 0.71, P <0.001. SI was significantly lower than SI clamp (8.08 ± 0.89 vs. 13.66 ± 1.69 10-4 dl·kg-1 ·min-1 per μU/ml, P = 0.0002), whereas SI* and SI*clamp were very similar 8.17 ± 1.59 vs. 8.84 ± 1.39 10-4 dl·kg-1·min-1 per μU/ml, P = 0.52). These results add credibility to the oral minimal-model method as a simple and reliable physiological tool to estimate SI and SI*, also in large-scale clinical trials.

AB - Measuring insulin sensitivity in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, e.g., during a meal or OGTT, is important to better understand insulin resistance in a variety of metabolic conditions. Recently, two oral minimal models have been proposed to measure overall insulin sensitivity (SI) and its selective effect on glucose disposal (SI*) from oral tests. SI and SI* have been successfully validated against multiple tracer meal estimates, but validation against euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp estimates is lacking. Here, we do so in 21 subjects who underwent both a multiple-tracer OGTT and a labeled euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Correlation between minimal-model SI, SI* and corresponding clamp estimates SI*clamp, SI*clamp was satisfactory, respectively r = 0.81, P <0.001, and r = 0.71, P <0.001. SI was significantly lower than SI clamp (8.08 ± 0.89 vs. 13.66 ± 1.69 10-4 dl·kg-1 ·min-1 per μU/ml, P = 0.0002), whereas SI* and SI*clamp were very similar 8.17 ± 1.59 vs. 8.84 ± 1.39 10-4 dl·kg-1·min-1 per μU/ml, P = 0.52). These results add credibility to the oral minimal-model method as a simple and reliable physiological tool to estimate SI and SI*, also in large-scale clinical trials.

KW - Insulin action

KW - Insulin resistance

KW - Meal

KW - Oral glucose tolerance test

KW - Tracer kinetics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644667012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644667012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/ajpendo.00076.2005

DO - 10.1152/ajpendo.00076.2005

M3 - Article

VL - 289

JO - American Journal of Physiology

JF - American Journal of Physiology

SN - 0363-6119

IS - 6

ER -