Inter-laboratory comparison of neuropathological assessments of β-amyloid protein: A study of the BrainNet Europe consortium

Irina Alafuzoff, Maria Pikkarainen, Thomas Arzberger, Dietmar R. Thal, Safa Al-Sarraj, Jeanne Bell, Istvan Bodi, Herbert Budka, Estibaliz Capetillo-Zarate, Isidro Ferrer, Ellen Gelpi, Stephen Gentleman, Giorgio Giaccone, Nikolaos Kavantzas, Andrew King, Penelope Korkolopoulou, Gábor G. Kovács, David Meyronet, Camelia Monoranu, Piero ParchiEfstratios Patsouris, Wolfgang Roggendorf, Christine Stadelmann, Nathalie Streichenberger, Fabricio Tagliavini, Hans Kretzschmar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Amyloid-β-protein (A β) is generally assessed by neuropathologists in diagnostics. This BrainNet Europe (http://www.brainnet-europe.org/) (15 centres and 26 participants) study was carried out to investigate the reliability of such an assessment. In the first part of this trial, tissue microarray sections were stained with the antibody of each centre's choice. Reflecting the reality, seven antibodies and a plethora of pretreatment strategies were used. Ninety-two percent of the stainings were of good/acceptable quality and the estimation of presence of Aβaggregates yielded good results. However, a poor agreement was reached particularly regarding quantitative (density) and qualitative (diffuse/cored plaques) results. During a joint meeting, the clone 4G8 was determined to label best the fleecy/diffuse plaques, and thus, this clone and the formic acid pretreatment technique were selected for the second part of this study. Subsequently, all stained sections were of good/acceptable quality and again a high level of concordance of the dichotomized (presence/absence) assessment of plaques and CAA was achieved. However, even when only one antibody was used, the type of Aβ-aggregates (diffuse/cored), type of vessel and Vonsattel grade, were not reliably assigned. Furthermore, the quantification of lesions was far from reliable. In line with the first trial, the agreement while assessing density (some, moderate and many) was unimpressive. In conclusion, we can confirm the utility of immunohistochemical detection of Aβ-protein in diagnostics and research. It is noteworthy that to reach reproducible results a dichotomized assessment of Aβ-immunoreactivity rather than quantification and assignment of various types of lesions should be applied, particularly when comparing results obtained by different neuropathologists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)533-546
Number of pages14
JournalActa Neuropathologica
Volume115
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Serum Amyloid A Protein
formic acid
Antibodies
Clone Cells
Staining and Labeling
Research
Proteins
Neuropathology

Keywords

  • β-Amyloid
  • BrainNet Europe
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Inter-laboratory study
  • Tissue microarray

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Alafuzoff, I., Pikkarainen, M., Arzberger, T., Thal, D. R., Al-Sarraj, S., Bell, J., ... Kretzschmar, H. (2008). Inter-laboratory comparison of neuropathological assessments of β-amyloid protein: A study of the BrainNet Europe consortium. Acta Neuropathologica, 115(5), 533-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-008-0358-2

Inter-laboratory comparison of neuropathological assessments of β-amyloid protein : A study of the BrainNet Europe consortium. / Alafuzoff, Irina; Pikkarainen, Maria; Arzberger, Thomas; Thal, Dietmar R.; Al-Sarraj, Safa; Bell, Jeanne; Bodi, Istvan; Budka, Herbert; Capetillo-Zarate, Estibaliz; Ferrer, Isidro; Gelpi, Ellen; Gentleman, Stephen; Giaccone, Giorgio; Kavantzas, Nikolaos; King, Andrew; Korkolopoulou, Penelope; Kovács, Gábor G.; Meyronet, David; Monoranu, Camelia; Parchi, Piero; Patsouris, Efstratios; Roggendorf, Wolfgang; Stadelmann, Christine; Streichenberger, Nathalie; Tagliavini, Fabricio; Kretzschmar, Hans.

In: Acta Neuropathologica, Vol. 115, No. 5, 05.2008, p. 533-546.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alafuzoff, I, Pikkarainen, M, Arzberger, T, Thal, DR, Al-Sarraj, S, Bell, J, Bodi, I, Budka, H, Capetillo-Zarate, E, Ferrer, I, Gelpi, E, Gentleman, S, Giaccone, G, Kavantzas, N, King, A, Korkolopoulou, P, Kovács, GG, Meyronet, D, Monoranu, C, Parchi, P, Patsouris, E, Roggendorf, W, Stadelmann, C, Streichenberger, N, Tagliavini, F & Kretzschmar, H 2008, 'Inter-laboratory comparison of neuropathological assessments of β-amyloid protein: A study of the BrainNet Europe consortium', Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 533-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-008-0358-2
Alafuzoff, Irina ; Pikkarainen, Maria ; Arzberger, Thomas ; Thal, Dietmar R. ; Al-Sarraj, Safa ; Bell, Jeanne ; Bodi, Istvan ; Budka, Herbert ; Capetillo-Zarate, Estibaliz ; Ferrer, Isidro ; Gelpi, Ellen ; Gentleman, Stephen ; Giaccone, Giorgio ; Kavantzas, Nikolaos ; King, Andrew ; Korkolopoulou, Penelope ; Kovács, Gábor G. ; Meyronet, David ; Monoranu, Camelia ; Parchi, Piero ; Patsouris, Efstratios ; Roggendorf, Wolfgang ; Stadelmann, Christine ; Streichenberger, Nathalie ; Tagliavini, Fabricio ; Kretzschmar, Hans. / Inter-laboratory comparison of neuropathological assessments of β-amyloid protein : A study of the BrainNet Europe consortium. In: Acta Neuropathologica. 2008 ; Vol. 115, No. 5. pp. 533-546.
@article{05e7b1e31619410c970d1fadca26e2b3,
title = "Inter-laboratory comparison of neuropathological assessments of β-amyloid protein: A study of the BrainNet Europe consortium",
abstract = "Amyloid-β-protein (A β) is generally assessed by neuropathologists in diagnostics. This BrainNet Europe (http://www.brainnet-europe.org/) (15 centres and 26 participants) study was carried out to investigate the reliability of such an assessment. In the first part of this trial, tissue microarray sections were stained with the antibody of each centre's choice. Reflecting the reality, seven antibodies and a plethora of pretreatment strategies were used. Ninety-two percent of the stainings were of good/acceptable quality and the estimation of presence of Aβaggregates yielded good results. However, a poor agreement was reached particularly regarding quantitative (density) and qualitative (diffuse/cored plaques) results. During a joint meeting, the clone 4G8 was determined to label best the fleecy/diffuse plaques, and thus, this clone and the formic acid pretreatment technique were selected for the second part of this study. Subsequently, all stained sections were of good/acceptable quality and again a high level of concordance of the dichotomized (presence/absence) assessment of plaques and CAA was achieved. However, even when only one antibody was used, the type of Aβ-aggregates (diffuse/cored), type of vessel and Vonsattel grade, were not reliably assigned. Furthermore, the quantification of lesions was far from reliable. In line with the first trial, the agreement while assessing density (some, moderate and many) was unimpressive. In conclusion, we can confirm the utility of immunohistochemical detection of Aβ-protein in diagnostics and research. It is noteworthy that to reach reproducible results a dichotomized assessment of Aβ-immunoreactivity rather than quantification and assignment of various types of lesions should be applied, particularly when comparing results obtained by different neuropathologists.",
keywords = "β-Amyloid, BrainNet Europe, Immunohistochemistry, Inter-laboratory study, Tissue microarray",
author = "Irina Alafuzoff and Maria Pikkarainen and Thomas Arzberger and Thal, {Dietmar R.} and Safa Al-Sarraj and Jeanne Bell and Istvan Bodi and Herbert Budka and Estibaliz Capetillo-Zarate and Isidro Ferrer and Ellen Gelpi and Stephen Gentleman and Giorgio Giaccone and Nikolaos Kavantzas and Andrew King and Penelope Korkolopoulou and Kov{\'a}cs, {G{\'a}bor G.} and David Meyronet and Camelia Monoranu and Piero Parchi and Efstratios Patsouris and Wolfgang Roggendorf and Christine Stadelmann and Nathalie Streichenberger and Fabricio Tagliavini and Hans Kretzschmar",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s00401-008-0358-2",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "533--546",
journal = "Acta Neuropathologica",
issn = "0001-6322",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inter-laboratory comparison of neuropathological assessments of β-amyloid protein

T2 - A study of the BrainNet Europe consortium

AU - Alafuzoff, Irina

AU - Pikkarainen, Maria

AU - Arzberger, Thomas

AU - Thal, Dietmar R.

AU - Al-Sarraj, Safa

AU - Bell, Jeanne

AU - Bodi, Istvan

AU - Budka, Herbert

AU - Capetillo-Zarate, Estibaliz

AU - Ferrer, Isidro

AU - Gelpi, Ellen

AU - Gentleman, Stephen

AU - Giaccone, Giorgio

AU - Kavantzas, Nikolaos

AU - King, Andrew

AU - Korkolopoulou, Penelope

AU - Kovács, Gábor G.

AU - Meyronet, David

AU - Monoranu, Camelia

AU - Parchi, Piero

AU - Patsouris, Efstratios

AU - Roggendorf, Wolfgang

AU - Stadelmann, Christine

AU - Streichenberger, Nathalie

AU - Tagliavini, Fabricio

AU - Kretzschmar, Hans

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Amyloid-β-protein (A β) is generally assessed by neuropathologists in diagnostics. This BrainNet Europe (http://www.brainnet-europe.org/) (15 centres and 26 participants) study was carried out to investigate the reliability of such an assessment. In the first part of this trial, tissue microarray sections were stained with the antibody of each centre's choice. Reflecting the reality, seven antibodies and a plethora of pretreatment strategies were used. Ninety-two percent of the stainings were of good/acceptable quality and the estimation of presence of Aβaggregates yielded good results. However, a poor agreement was reached particularly regarding quantitative (density) and qualitative (diffuse/cored plaques) results. During a joint meeting, the clone 4G8 was determined to label best the fleecy/diffuse plaques, and thus, this clone and the formic acid pretreatment technique were selected for the second part of this study. Subsequently, all stained sections were of good/acceptable quality and again a high level of concordance of the dichotomized (presence/absence) assessment of plaques and CAA was achieved. However, even when only one antibody was used, the type of Aβ-aggregates (diffuse/cored), type of vessel and Vonsattel grade, were not reliably assigned. Furthermore, the quantification of lesions was far from reliable. In line with the first trial, the agreement while assessing density (some, moderate and many) was unimpressive. In conclusion, we can confirm the utility of immunohistochemical detection of Aβ-protein in diagnostics and research. It is noteworthy that to reach reproducible results a dichotomized assessment of Aβ-immunoreactivity rather than quantification and assignment of various types of lesions should be applied, particularly when comparing results obtained by different neuropathologists.

AB - Amyloid-β-protein (A β) is generally assessed by neuropathologists in diagnostics. This BrainNet Europe (http://www.brainnet-europe.org/) (15 centres and 26 participants) study was carried out to investigate the reliability of such an assessment. In the first part of this trial, tissue microarray sections were stained with the antibody of each centre's choice. Reflecting the reality, seven antibodies and a plethora of pretreatment strategies were used. Ninety-two percent of the stainings were of good/acceptable quality and the estimation of presence of Aβaggregates yielded good results. However, a poor agreement was reached particularly regarding quantitative (density) and qualitative (diffuse/cored plaques) results. During a joint meeting, the clone 4G8 was determined to label best the fleecy/diffuse plaques, and thus, this clone and the formic acid pretreatment technique were selected for the second part of this study. Subsequently, all stained sections were of good/acceptable quality and again a high level of concordance of the dichotomized (presence/absence) assessment of plaques and CAA was achieved. However, even when only one antibody was used, the type of Aβ-aggregates (diffuse/cored), type of vessel and Vonsattel grade, were not reliably assigned. Furthermore, the quantification of lesions was far from reliable. In line with the first trial, the agreement while assessing density (some, moderate and many) was unimpressive. In conclusion, we can confirm the utility of immunohistochemical detection of Aβ-protein in diagnostics and research. It is noteworthy that to reach reproducible results a dichotomized assessment of Aβ-immunoreactivity rather than quantification and assignment of various types of lesions should be applied, particularly when comparing results obtained by different neuropathologists.

KW - β-Amyloid

KW - BrainNet Europe

KW - Immunohistochemistry

KW - Inter-laboratory study

KW - Tissue microarray

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41949122088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41949122088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00401-008-0358-2

DO - 10.1007/s00401-008-0358-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 18343933

AN - SCOPUS:41949122088

VL - 115

SP - 533

EP - 546

JO - Acta Neuropathologica

JF - Acta Neuropathologica

SN - 0001-6322

IS - 5

ER -